Abstract
Even though causation is often considered a constitutive aspect of scientific explanation, agent-based computational social science, as an emergent disciplinary field, has systematically neglected the question of whether explanation using agent-based models is causal. Rather than discussing the reasons for this neglect, the article builds on the assumption that, since explanation in the field is already heavily permeated by causal reasoning and language, the articulation of a causal theory of explanation would help standardisation. With this goal in mind, the text briefly explores four candidate accounts of causation on which a causal theory of explanation in agent-based computational social science could be grounded: agent causation, algorithmic causation, interventionist causation and causal mechanisms. It suggests that, while the first two accounts are intuitively appealing, for they seem to stress the most important methodological aspects of agent-based modelling, a more robust theory of causal explanation could be developed if the field focuses, instead, on causal mechanisms and interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elster, J.: Explaining Social Behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)
Hedström, P.: Dissecting the Social. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Salmon, W.: Causality and Explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
Woodward, J.: Making Things Happen. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Danks, D.: The psychology of causal perception and reasoning. In: Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., Menzies, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Woodward, J.: Causal perception and causal cognition. In: Roessler, J., Lerman, H., Eilan, N. (eds.) Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Freedman, D.: From association to causation: some remarks on the history of statistics. Stat. Sci. 14, 243–258 (1999)
Turner, S.: Cause, the persistence of teleology, and the origins of the philosophy of social science. In: Turner, S., Roth, P. (eds.) The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)
Sehon, S.: Goal-directed action and teleological explanation. In: Campbell, J., O’Rourke, M., Silverstein, H. (eds.) Causation and Explanation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2007)
Sintonen, M.: Explanation: in search of the rationale. In: Kitcher, P., Salmon, W. (eds.) Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1989)
Macy, M., Willer, R.: From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 143–166 (2002)
Anzola, D., Barbrook-Johnson, P., Cano, J.: Self-organization and social science. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory. 23, 221–257 (2017)
Anzola, D.: The philosophy of computational social science. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Surrey (2015). http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/808102
Schaffer, J.: Causal contextualism. In: Blaauw, M. (ed.) Contrastivism in Philosophy. Routledge, New York (2012)
Halpern, J., Hitchcock, C.: Graded causation and defaults. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 66, 413–457 (2015)
Hitchcock, C.: Three concepts of causation. Philos. Compass. 2, 508–516 (2007)
Tesfatsion, L.: Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. In: Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics. Elsevier, London (2006)
Epstein, J.: Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity. 4, 41–60 (1999)
Joas, H.: The Creativity of Action. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)
Stones, R.: Theories of social action. In: Turner, B. (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Wiley-Blackwell, New York (2009)
Helle, H.: The classical foundations of micro-sociological paradigm. In: Helle, H., Eisenstadt, S. (eds.) Micro Sociological Theory. Sage, Bristol (1985)
Winch, P.: The Idea of Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. Routledge, London (1990)
Schelling, T.: Micromotives and Macrovehavior. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (1978)
Bhaskar, R.: The Possibility of Naturalism. Routledge, London (1998)
Bunge, M.: How does it work?: the search for explanatory mechanisms. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34, 182–210 (2004)
Harré, R.: The Philosophies of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1985)
Elsenbroich, C.: Explanation in agent-based modelling: functions, causality or mechanisms? J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 15, (2012)
Hedström, P., Ylikoski, P.: Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 49–67 (2010)
Manzo, G.: Variables, mechanisms, and simulations: can the three methods be synthesized?: a critical analysis of the literature. Rev. Fr. Sociol. 48, 35–71 (2007)
Squazzoni, F.: Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Wiley, London (2012)
Doreian, P.: Causality in social network analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 30, 81–114 (2001)
Anzola, D.: Knowledge transfer in agent-based computational social science. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A. 37, 29–38 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.05.001
Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A.: Explanation: a mechanist alternative. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 36, 421–441 (2005)
Machamer, P., Darden, L., Craver, C.: Thinking about mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 67, 1–25 (2000)
Woodward, J.: Counterfactuals and causal explanation. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 18, 41–72 (2004)
Waskan, J.: Mechanistic explanation at the limit. Synthese. 183, 389–408 (2011)
Menzies, P., Price, H.: Causation as a secondary quality. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 44, 187–203 (1993)
Barringer, S., Eliason, S., Leahey, E.: A history of causal analysis in the social sciences. In: Morgan, S. (ed.) Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Goertz, G., Mahoney, J.: A Tale of Two Cultures. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Blackwell, London (2001)
Robinson, J.: Economic development and democracy. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 9, 503–527 (2006)
O’Donnell, G.: Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of International Studies (1979)
Mainwaring, S., Pérez-Liñán, A.: Level of development and democracy: Latin American exceptionalism, 1945-1996. Comp. Polit. Stud. 36, 1031–1067 (2003)
Woodward, J.: Sensitive and insensitive causation. Philos. Rev. 115, 1–50 (2006)
Schelling, T.: Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143–186 (1971)
Reardon, S., O’Sullivan, D.: Measures of spatial segregation. Sociol. Methodol. 34, 121–162 (2004)
Bruch, E., Mare, R.: Segregation dynamics. In: Hedström, P., Bearman, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Macy, M., Centola, D., Flache, A., van de Rijt, A., Willer, R.: Social mechanisms and generative explanations: computational models with double agents. In: Demeulenaere, P. (ed.) Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Goldthorpe, J.: Causation, statistics, and sociology. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 17, 1–20 (2000)
Woodward, J.: Interventionist theories of causation in psychological perspective. In: Gopnik, A., Schulz, L. (eds.) Causal Learning. Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)
Bogen, J.: Analysing causality: the opposite of counterfactual is factual. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 18, 3–26 (2004)
Woodward, J.: Causal models in the social sciences. In: Turner, S., Risjord, M. (eds.) Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)
Glennan, S.: Mechanisms. In: Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., Menzies, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Illari, P., Williamson, J.: In defence of activities. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 44, 69–83 (2013)
Tabery, J.: Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism. Philos. Sci. 71, 1–15 (2004)
Anscombe, G.: Causality and determination. In: Sosa, E., Tooley, M. (eds.) Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)
Illari, P.: Why theories of causality need production: an information transmission account. Philos. Technol. 24, 95–114 (2010)
Campaner, R., Galavotti, M.: Some remarks on causality and invariance. In: Arturo, C. (ed.) Causality, Meaningful Complexity and Embodied Cognition. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Craver, C.: Explaining the Brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Woodward, J.: Mechanisms revisited. Synthese. 183, 409–427 (2011)
Woodward, J.: Mechanistic explanation: its scope and limits. Aristot. Soc. Suppl. Vol. 87, 39–65 (2013)
Grüne-Yanoff, T.: The explanatory potential of artificial societies. Synthese. 169, 539–555 (2008)
Fossett, M., Dietrich, D.: Effects of city size, shape, and form, and neighborhood size and shape in agent-based models of residential segregation: are schelling-style preference effects robust? Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 36, 149–169 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Anzola, D. (2020). Causation in Agent-Based Computational Social Science. In: Verhagen, H., Borit, M., Bravo, G., Wijermans, N. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34126-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34127-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)