Abstract
In the current digital era, with an increasingly complex and turbulent society, demand is rising for social scientists capable of analysing behavioural dynamics. Studying behavioural dynamics is a valuable lens, both in public policy making and community planning and in scientific projects on how human behaviour affects ecosystems. Computational social science (CSS) offers a framework for this type of studies, as it connects a complex networked systems perspective with a suite of computational tools and methodologies. Despite its potential and fast growth, CSS is still hardly found in programmes at bachelor and master levels in Europe. We would like to take a closer look at this discrepancy. We discuss why there is a need to develop computational education in the social sciences and why it is a challenge. We consider two perspectives. In the students’ perspective, there is the problem of mathematical anxiety and gender inequalities in STEM education. In the academic teachers’ perspective, there is the problem of a split within social sciences, inadequacy of statistical models for analysing dynamics, and insufficient educational resources at an appropriate level of difficulty. We build a case for creating a MOOC programme addressed specifically to social sciences students to fill in the existing gaps, facilitate the organisation of learning communities, and advance computational thinking within social science. Creating such a MOOC programme is the goal of our Erasmus+ project “Action for Computational Thinking in Social Sciences” (ACTISS).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Science, technology, engineering, and math
- 2.
Social sciences, humanities, and arts
- 3.
CoMSES computational library: https://www.comses.net/codebases/
References
EU Commission document: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions supporting growth and jobs – an agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0567. Accessed 21 March 2018 (2011)
Cioffi-Revilla, C.: Introduction to Computational Social Science. Principles and Applications. Springer, London (2014)
Vallacher, R.R., Read, S.J., Nowak, A. (eds.): Computational Social Psychology. Routledge, New York (2017)
Open Science Collaboration: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 349(6251), (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Jager, W.: Enhancing the realism of simulation (EROS): on implementing and developing psychological theory in social simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 20(3), 14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3522
Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maindenhead (2005)
Squazzoni, F., Jager, W., Edmonds, B.: Social simulation in the social sciences: a brief overview. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32(3), 279–294 (2014)
Watts, D.J.: Should social science be more solution-oriented? Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0015 (2017)
Metzler, K., Kim, D.A., Allum, N., Denman, A.: Who is Doing Computational Social Science? Trends in Big Data Research (White Paper). SAGE Publishing, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.4135/wp160926
Ashcraft, M.H.: Math anxiety: personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11(5), 181–185 (2002)
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Wilson, V.A.: Statistics anxiety: nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments--a comprehensive review of the literature. Teach. High. Educ. 8(2), 195–209 (2003)
Zeidner, M.: Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: some interesting parallels. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 61(3), 319–328 (1991)
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., Gebhardt, E.: Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study international report. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2018 (2014)
Eurostat database: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed 21 March 2018 (2017)
Buschor, C.B., Berweger, S., Keck Frei, A., Kappler, C.: Majoring in STEM—what accounts for women’s career decision making? A mixed methods study. J. Educ. Res. 107(3), 167–176 (2014)
Nightingale, P., Scott, A.: Peer review and the relevance gap: ten suggestions for policy-makers. Sci. Public Policy. 34(8), 543–553 (2007)
Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O’Hare, A., Nightingale, P., Stirling, A.: How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Res. Policy. 41(7), 1262–1282 (2012)
Wilensky, U.: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Netlogo (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jager, W. et al. (2020). Looking into the Educational Mirror: Why Computation Is Hardly Being Taught in the Social Sciences, and What to Do About It. In: Verhagen, H., Borit, M., Bravo, G., Wijermans, N. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34126-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34127-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)