Abstract
In this chapter, two general neurobiological models recently advanced by Gainotti and by Craig to explain most clinical, neuropsychological and neurobiological data reported in previous chapters of this volume will be taken into account. Gainotti’s model develops the ‘right hemisphere hypothesis’ and assumes that the main features of the emotional system (considered as a phylogenetically older, emergency system), may be consonant with the nonverbal functional organisation of the right hemisphere, viewed as more primitive than the verbally moulded left hemisphere. According to this model, a high degree of emotional processing, reliance on sensorimotor functions, unawareness and automaticity should characterise the nonverbal functional organisation of the right hemisphere. On the contrary, a prevalence of verbal cognitive processing, consciousness and intentionality should characterise the left hemisphere’s functional organisation. According to Craig’s model, which develops the ‘valence hypothesis’, hemispheric asymmetries for emotional experience could be based on an unequal representation of homeostatic activities, resulting from asymmetries in the peripheral autonomic nervous system. As a consequence of these peripheral asymmetries, prosocial activities, supported by parasympathetic functions, should be mainly represented in the left hemisphere, whereas individual-oriented (survival) emotions, supported by sympathetic activities, should be mainly represented in the right hemisphere.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson S, Finset A. Heart rate and skin conductance reactivity to brief psychological stress in brain-injured patients. J Psychosom Res. 1998;44:645–56.
Barron SA, Rogovski Z, Hemli J. Autonomic consequences of cerebral hemisphere infarction. Stroke. 1994;25:113–6.
Bartolomeo P, Chokron S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:217–34.
Caltagirone C, Zoccolotti P, Originale G, Daniele A, Mammucari A. Autonomic reactivity and facial expression of emotions in brain-damaged patients. In: Gainotti G, Caltagirone C, editors. Emotions and the dual brain. Heidelberg: Springer; 1989. p. 204–21.
Cannon WB. The James-Lange theory of emotion: a critical examination and an alternative theory. Am J Psychol. 1927;39:106–24.
Colivicchi F, Bassi A, Santini M, Caltagirone C. Cardiac autonomic derangement and arrhythmias in right-sided stroke with insular involvement. Stroke. 2004;35:2094–8.
Craig AD. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:655–66.
Craig AD. Forebrain emotional asymmetry: a neuroanatomical basis? Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:566–71.
Craig AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:59–70.
Craig AD. The sentient self. Brain Struct Funct. 2010;214:563–77.
Craig AD. Significance of the insula for the evolution of human awareness of feelings from the body. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1225:72–82.
Craig AD, Chen K, Bandy D, Reiman EM. Thermosensory activation of insular cortex. Nature. Neurosci. 2000;3:184–90.
Ekman P. Expression and the nature of emotion. In: Scherer K, Ekman P, editors. Approachs to emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984. p. 319–44.
Frijda NH. The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
Frijda NH. Emotions, cognitive structures and action tendency. Cogn Emot. 1987;1:115–43.
Gainotti G. Lateralization of brain mechanisms underlying automatic and controlled forms of spatial orienting of attention. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20:617–22.
Gainotti G. Emotions, unconscious processes and the right hemisphere. Neuro-psychoanalysis. 2005;7:71–81.
Gainotti G. Face familiarity feelings, the right temporal lobe and the possibile underlying neural mechanisms. Brain Res Rev. 2007a;56:214–35.
Gainotti G. Different patterns of famous people recognition disorders in patients with right and left anterior temporal lesions: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia. 2007b;45:1591–607.
Gainotti G. What the study of voice recognition in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients tells us about models of familiar people recognition. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:2273–82.
Gainotti G. The format of conceptual representations disrupted in semantic dementia: a position paper. Cortex. 2012;48:521–9.
Gainotti G. Is the difference between right and left ATLs due to the distinction between general and social cognition or between verbal and non-verbal representations? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;51:296–312.
Gainotti G. Emotions and the right hemisphere: can new data clarify old models? Neuroscientist. 2019a;25:258–70.
Gainotti G. The role of the right hemisphere in emotional and behavioral disorders of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an updated review. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019b; https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00055.
Guo CC, Sturm VE, Zhou J, Gennatas ED, Trujillo AJ, Hua AY, et al. Dominant hemisphere lateralization of cortical parasympathetic control as revealed by frontotemporal dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E2430–9.
Hanamori T, Kunitake T, Kato K, Kannan H. Responses of neurons in the insular cortex to gustatory, visceral, and nociceptive stimuli in rats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:2535–45.
Harmon-Jones E, Allen JJB. Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1310–6.
Harmon-Jones E, Sigelman J. State anger and prefrontal brain activity: evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80:797–803.
Hewig J, Hagemann D, Seifert J, Naumann E, Bartussek D. On the selective relation of frontal cortical asymmetry and anger-out versus anger-control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;87:926–39.
Làdavas E, Cimatti D, Del Pesce M, Tozzi G. Emotional evaluation with and without conscious stimulus identifications: evidence from a split-brain patient. Cogn Emot. 1993;7:95–114.
LeDoux J. The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1996.
Lindell AK. Continuities in emotion lateralization in human and non-human primates. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00464. eCollection 2013.
Morris JS, Ohman A, Dolan RJ, Rowland D, Young AW, Calder AJ, et al. Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature. 1998;393:467–70.
Morris JS, Ohman A, Dolan RJ. A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. PNAS. 1999;96:1680–5.
Naver HK, Blomstrand C, Wallin G. Reduced heart rate variability after right-sided stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:247–51.
Oppenheimer SM, Gelb A, Girvin JP, Hachinski VC. Cardiovascular effects of human insular cortex stimulation. Neurology. 1992;42:1727–32.
Panksepp J. Affective consciousness in animals: perspectives on dimensional and primary process emotion approaches. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;277:2905–7.
Russell JA, Barrett LF. Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76:805–19.
Shi CJ, Cassell MD. Cortical, thalamic, and amygdaloid connections of the anterior and posterior insular cortices. J Comp Neurol. 1998;399:440–68.
Snowden JS, Thompson JC, Neary D. Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia. Brain. 2004;127:860–72.
Spence S, Shapiro D, Zaidel E. The role of the right hemisphere in the physiological and cognitive components of emotional processing. Psychophysiology. 1996;33:112–22.
Sturm VE, Sible IJ, Datta S, Hua AY, Perry DC, Kramer JH, et al. Resting parasympathetic dysfunction predicts prosocial helping deficits in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Cortex. 2018a;109:141–55.
Sturm VE, Brown JA, Hua AY, Lwi SJ, Zhou J, Kurth F, et al. Network architecture underlying basal autonomic outflow: evidence from Frontotemporal dementia. J Neurosci. 2018b;38:8943–55.
Tokgozoglu SL, Batur MK, Topçuoglu MA, Saribas O, Kes S, Oto A. Effects of stroke localization on cardiac autonomic balance and sudden death. Stroke. 1999;30:1307–11.
Toller G, Brown J, Sollberger M, Shdo SM, Bouvet L, Sukhanov P, et al. Individual differences in socioemotional sensitivity are an index of salience network function. Cortex. 2018;103:211–23.
Toller G, Yang WFZ, Brown JA, Ranasinghe KG, Shdo SM, Kramer JH, et al. Divergent patterns of loss of interpersonal warmth in frontotemporal dementia syndromes are predicted by altered intrinsic network connectivity. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101729.
Vuilleumier P, Mohr C, Valenza N, Wetzel C, Landis T. Hyperfamiliarity for unknown faces after left lateral temporo-occipital venous infarction: a double dissociation with prosopagnosia. Brain. 2003;126:889–907.
Wallez C, Vauclair J. Human (Homo sapiens) and baboon (Papio papio) chimeric face processing: right-hemisphere involvement. J Comp Psychol. 2013;127:237–44.
Wittling W. Brain asymmetry in the control of autonomic-physiologic activity. In: Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K, editors. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1995. p. 305–57.
Wittling W, Block A, Genzel S, Schweiger E. Hemisphere asymmetry in parasympathetic control of the heart. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:461–8.
Woollams AM, Patterson K. Cognitive consequences of the left-right asymmetry of atrophy in semantic dementia. Cortex. 2018;107:64–77.
Yokoyama K, Jennings R, Ackles P, Hood BS, Boller F. Lack of heart rate changes during attention-demanding tasks after right hemisphere lesions. Neurology. 1987;37:624–30.
Zoccolotti P, Caltagirone C, Benedetti N, Gainotti G. Perturbation des réponses végétatives aux stimuli émotionnels au cours des lésions hémisphériques unilatérales. L’Encéphale. 1986;12:263–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gainotti, G. (2020). General Neurobiological Models Advanced to Explain Results Obtained Following these New Lines of Research. In: Emotions and the Right Side of the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34090-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34090-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34089-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34090-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)