Skip to main content

How Digital Business Platforms Can Reduce Food Losses and Waste?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Supply Chains in Cities

Abstract

This research sought to understand how Digital Business Platforms (DBP) can contribute to food waste solutions by improving supply chain coordination. A qualitative approach was used, based on primary and secondary data collection. The first phase investigated 28 stakeholders to understand their coordination difficulties. The second phase analysed three case studies about food DBP. Results indicate DBP contribute to food waste solutions by improving supply chain coordination mostly through informal mechanisms, increasing collaboration between supply chain agents. They act as a bridge between production and consumption, creating a new market for food that would be discarded in many stages of the supply chain either by non-standard compliance or by the absence of a market, also creating consumer demand through awareness and subscription purchase mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghalaya, S. N., & Verma, P. (2018). Identifying sustainability metrics for a coordinated value chain using QFD. The 5th international EurOMA Sustainable Operations and Supply Chains Forum, University of Kassel, Germany, March 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P., Brown, C., Arneth, A., Finnigan, J., Moran, D., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2017). Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. Agricultural Systems, 153, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, G., Pilbeam, C., & Wilding, R. (2010). Nestlé Nespresso AAA sustainable quality program: An investigation into the governance dynamics in a multi stakeholder supply chain network. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschemann-Witzel, J., de Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability, 7(6), 6457–6477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, Y. (1998). The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brancoli, P., Rousta, K., & Bolton, K. (2017). Life cycle assessment of supermarket food waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 118, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, J. C., & Hyman, J. (2012). Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States. Food Policy, 37(5), 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Zhao, X., Tang, O., Price, L., Zhang, S., & Zhu, W. (2017). Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 194, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. C., Leung, L. C., Van Hui, Y., & Cheung, W. (2007). Evolution of e-commerce Web sites: A conceptual framework and a longitudinal study. Information & Management, 44(2), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., Pontrandolfo, P., & Pujari, D. (2013). Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dania, W. A. P., Xing, K., & Amer, Y. (2018). Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 851–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, H. C. (2004). Control of inter-organizational relationships: Evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2013). Food wastage footprint: Impacts on natural resources – Summary report. Retrieved April 13, 2017, from http://www.fao.org/

  • Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. Platforms, Markets and Innovation, 45, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). Platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review. 68–75. Boston, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakis, M., Doran, D., & Chen, S. (2012). The Chinese paradigm of global supplier relationships: Social control, formal interactions and the mediating role of culture. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 831–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel, C., Langen, N., Blumenthal, A., Teitscheid, P., & Ritter, G. (2015). Cutting food waste through cooperation along the food supply chain. Sustainability, 7(2), 1429–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K. (2018). Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management & Governance, 1(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 531–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Van Otterdijk, R., & Meybeck, A. (2011). Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C. P., & Gutiérrez-Leefmans, M. (2018). A taxonomy of SME e-commerce platforms derived from a market-level analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22(2), 161–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Dooley, K. J., Hyatt, D. G., & Hutson, A. M. (2018). Emerging discourse incubator: Cross-sector relations in global supply chains: A social capital perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 54, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawano, B. R., Mores, G. D. V., Silva, R. F. D., & Cugnasca, C. E. (2012). Estratégias para resolução dos principais desafios da logística de produtos agrícolas exportados pelo Brasil. Revista de Economia e Agronegócio/Brazilian Review of Economics and Agribusiness, 10(822-2016-54244), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems, 118, 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumineau, F., & Henderson, J. E. (2012). The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer-supplier disputes. Journal of Operations Management, 30(5), 382–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCarthy, B. L., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J. S., & Zhao, X. (2016). Supply chain evolution–theory, concepts and science. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(12), 1696–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazed, A., & Johnson, N. L. (2016). Modern monopolies: What it takes to dominate the 21st-century economy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neutzling, D. M., Land, A., Seuring, S., & do Nascimento, L. F. M. (2018). Linking sustainability-oriented innovation to supply chain relationship integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3448–3458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation and inter-fi rm linkages: New implications for policy. Research Policy, 28, 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., & bin Ujang, Z. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt, J., Mark, B., & Sarah, M. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: Quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 3065–3081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, C., Alvarez, G., & Wilson, H. (2012). The governance of supply networks: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M., & Wikoff, R. (2017). Institutional sustainable purchasing priorities: Stakeholder perceptions vs environmental reality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 162–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Díaz, M., & Espino-Rodríguez, T. F. (2006). Redesigning the supply chain: Reengineering, outsourcing, and relational capabilities. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruutu, S., Casey, T., & Kotovirta, V. (2017). Development and competition of digital service platforms: A system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Kazeminia, A. (2015). Does implementing social supplier development practices pay off? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, P. C., & Rebs, T. (2018). Identifying theories, methods, and applications in qualitative and quantitative SSCM research – A Delphi Study. The 5th international EurOMA Sustainable Operations and Supply Chains Forum, University of Kassel, Germany, March 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, B. S. (2015). A hard nut to crack! Implementing supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. (2009). Waste: Uncovering the global waste scandal. London, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. D., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2015). Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 198–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyberg, K. L., & Tonjes, D. J. (2016). Drivers of food waste and their implications for sustainable policy development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 106, 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Love me, love me not: A nuanced view on collaboration in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(3), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia, Z. G., Nix, N. W., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 591–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, R., Xu, X., & Wang, L. (2017). Food supply chain management: Systems, implementations, and future research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(9), 2085–2114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, F., & Furr, N. (2016). Products to platforms: Making the leap. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Chu, F., Dolgui, A., Chu, C., Zhou, W., & Piramuthu, S. (2018). Recent advances and opportunities in sustainable food supply chain: A model-oriented review. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Marques Vieira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vieira, L.M., Matzembacher, D.E. (2020). How Digital Business Platforms Can Reduce Food Losses and Waste?. In: Aktas, E., Bourlakis, M. (eds) Food Supply Chains in Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34065-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics