Skip to main content

An Economic and Environmental Comparison of Conventional and Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) Supply Chains for Leaf Lettuce to US Cities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Supply Chains in Cities

Abstract

We assess the landed costs and selected environmental outcomes of conventional field-based and representative CEA supply chains (greenhouses and plant factories) for leaf lettuce delivered to wholesale markets in two US cities. Simulation modeling using heat balance methods was used to assess CEA energy use. Landed costs of field-produced lettuce from California were less than half those from CEA systems. “Best case” analysis suggests few plausible assumptions under which urban-based CEA supply chains have landed costs comparable to field-based supply chains. Energy use and Global Warming Potential (GWP) were also generally larger for CEA supply chains, although a CEA greenhouse had only slightly higher values for GWP if located near its delivery location. Additional analysis of more automated systems in peri-urban areas is merited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At present, we estimate that at least 90% of the light in VF would need to come from supplemental light, so in practice most light in a vertical farm would probably need to come from supplemental sources.

  2. 2.

    Note that we have not accounted for potential differences in prices that wholesalers (or consumers) are willing to pay for lettuce produced in the same metropolitan area. This may make the profitability differences smaller than the landed cost differences that are our focus here.

References

  • Albright, L. D., Both, A. J., & Chiu, A. J. (2010). Controlling greenhouse light to a consistent daily integral. Transactions of ASAE, 43(2), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.2721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE. (2004). Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings. ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004. Atlanta, GA: American National Standards Institute/American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers/Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE. (2017). 2017 ASHRAE handbook: Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. (2017). LCA, LCI, LCIA, LCC: What’s the difference? Retrieved from http://www.athenasmi.org/resources/about-lca/whats-the-difference/

  • Bartzas, G., Zaharaki, D., & Komnitsas, K. (2015). Life cycle assessment of open field and greenhouse cultivation of lettuce and barley. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2, 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beccali, M., Cellura, M., Iudicello, M., & Mistretta, M. (2010). Life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Sensitivity analysis and improvement scenarios. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(7), 1415–1428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, A. E. (2002). Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, D. B., Lawrie, L. K., Winkelmann, F. C., Buhl, W. F., Huang, Y. J., Pedersen, C. O., et al. (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33(4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A. (2018). Cost of capital by sector, United States. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/wacc.htm

  • Eaves, J., & Eaves, S. (2018). Comparing the profitability of a greenhouse to a vertical farm in Quebec. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 66(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, I., & Brown, S. (2016). Lettuce to reduce greenhouse gases: A comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and community agriculture. In S. Brown, K. McIvor, & E. Hodges Snyder (Eds.), Sowing seeds in the city: Ecosystem and municipal services (pp. 161–169). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7453-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foteinis, S., & Chatzisymeon, E. (2016). Life cycle assessment of organic versus conventional agriculture. A case study of lettuce cultivation in Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.075. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, M. I., Mattson, N., & Nishi, I. (2017, November 2). Interactive business tool for CEA vegetables: Lettuce & Tomato Presentation at the Cornell CEA Entrepreneur Conference. Retrieved from http://cea.cals.cornell.edu/research/marketing/Cost%20Study.pdf

  • Graamans, L., Baeza, E., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Tsafaras, I., & Stanghellini, C. (2018). Plant factories versus greenhouses: Comparison of resource use efficiency. Agricultural Systems, 160, 31–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunady, M. G. A., Biswas, W., Solah, V. A., & James, A. P. (2012). Evaluating the global warming potential of the fresh produce supply chain for strawberries, romaine/cos lettuces (Lactuca sativa), and button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) in Western Australia using life cycle assessment (LCA). Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbick, K., & Albright, L. (2016). Comparison of energy consumption: Greenhouses and plant factories. Acta Horticulturae, (1134), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1134.38

  • Hospido, A., Milà, I., Canals, L., Mclaren, S., Truninger, M., Edwards-jones, G., et al. (2009). The role of seasonality in lettuce consumption: A case study of environmental and social aspects. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0091-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozai, T., Niu, G., & Takagaki, M. (Eds.). (2015). Plant factory: An indoor vertical farming system for efficient quality food production. Academic Press. 422 pp. ISBN 9780128017753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot, L. J. A. (2000). Urban agriculture: Definition, presence, potentials and risks. In N. Bakker, M. Dubbeling, S. Gündel, U. Sabel-Koschella, & H. De Zeeuw (Eds.), Growing cities, growing food: Urban agriculture on the policy agenda. A reader on urban agriculture (pp. 99–117). Feldafing, Germany: DSE/ETC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadal, A., Llorach-Massana, P., Cuerva, E., Lïpez-Capel, E., Montero, J. I., Josa, A., et al. (2017). Building-integrated rooftop greenhouses: An energy and environmental assessment in the Mediterranean context. Applied Energy, 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbean Capital. (2015, March). Indoor crop production feeding the future. Retrieved March 23, 2018, from https://indoor.ag/whitepaper/

  • Notarnicola, B., Sala, S., Anton, A., McLaren, S. J., Saouter, E., & Sonesson, U. (2017). The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Gámez, M., Audsley, E., & Suárez-Rey, E. M. (2014). Life cycle assessment of cultivating lettuce and escarole in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, A., Ridoutt, B., Page, G., & Bellotti, W. (2016). Environmental performance of local food: Trade-offs and implications for climate resilience in a developed city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiina, T., Hosokawa, D., Roy, P., Orikasa, T., Nakamura, N., & Thammawong, M. (2011). Life cycle inventory analysis of leafy vegetables grown in two types of plant factories. Acta Horticulturae, 115. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.919.14

  • Stoessel, F., Juraske, R., Pfister, S., & Hellweg, S. (2012). Life cycle inventory and carbon and water food print of fruits and vegetables: Application to a Swiss retailer. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(6), 3253–3262. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2030577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourte, L., Smith, R. F., Murdock, J., & Sumner, D. A. (2017). Sample costs to produce and harvest iceberg lettuce—2017: Central coast—Monterey, Santa Cruz, and San Benito counties. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension and Agricultural Issues Center, UC Davis Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2017). Vegetables 2016 summary. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, S., & Marion, W. (2008). Users manual for TMY3 data sets. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Technical Report NREL/TP-581-43156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles F. Nicholson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Characteristics and assumptions for energy modeling of GH and PF production systems
Table 7 Detailed calculations for field-based lettuce production operating costs per acre
Table 8 Detailed calculations for field-based lettuce production structure and equipment costs per acre
Table 9 Detailed calculations for field-based lettuce transportation costs
Table 10 Annual operations costs for greenhouse and plant factory operations
Table 11 Total investment costs for structures, land and equipment for greenhouse and plant factory operations
Table 12 Detailed calculations for CEA lettuce transportation costs
Table 13 Energy use and cost calculations for New York metropolitan area greenhouse and plant factory operations
Table 14 Energy use and cost calculations for Chicago metropolitan area greenhouse and plant factory operations
Table 15 Detailed calculations of CO2 equivalent emissions, field, greenhouse and plant factory operations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nicholson, C.F., Harbick, K., Gómez, M.I., Mattson, N.S. (2020). An Economic and Environmental Comparison of Conventional and Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) Supply Chains for Leaf Lettuce to US Cities. In: Aktas, E., Bourlakis, M. (eds) Food Supply Chains in Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34065-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics