Skip to main content

Research Paper Recommender System with Serendipity Using Tweets vs. Diversification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11853))

Abstract

So far, a lot of works have studied research paper recommender systems. However, most of them have focused only on the accuracy and ignored the serendipity, which is an important aspect for user satisfaction. The serendipity is concerned with the novelty of recommendations and to which extent recommendations positively surprise users. In this paper, we investigate a research paper recommender system focusing on serendipity. In particular, we examine (1) whether a user’s tweets lead to a generation of serendipitous recommendations and (2) whether the use of diversification on a recommendation list improves serendipity. We have conducted an online experiment with 22 subjects in the domain of computer science. The result of our experiment shows that tweets do not improve the serendipity, despite their heterogeneous nature. However, diversification delivers serendipitous research papers that cannot be generated by a traditional strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://scholar.google.co.jp/.

  2. 2.

    https://dblp.uni-trier.de/pers/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012.

References

  1. Abel, F., Herder, E., Krause, D.: Extraction of professional interests from social web profiles. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), pp. 5–14. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S., Breitinger, C.: Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 17(4), 305–338 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bostandjiev, S., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T.: Taste-weights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, J., Nairn, R., Nelson, L., Bernstein, M., Chi, E.: Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., Jannach, D.: Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 257–260. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goossen, F., IJntema, W., Frasincar, F., Hogenboom, F., Kaymak, U.: News personalization using the CF-IDF semantic recommender. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS). ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Große-Bölting, G., Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: A comparison of different strategies for automated semantic document annotation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP), pp. 8:1–8:8. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Große-Bölting, G., Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: Generic process for extracting user profiles from social media using hierarchical knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Semantic Computing (IEEE ICSC), pp. 197–200. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapanipathi, P., Jain, P., Venkataramani, C., Sheth, A.: User interests identification on Twitter using a hierarchical knowledge base. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 99–113. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J.G., Decker, S.: Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Proceedings of Web Science Conference. Web Science Trust (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G.: Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 73–105. Springer, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1097–1101. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mendoza, J.L.: A significance test for multisample sphericity. Psychometrika 45(4), 495–498 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nascimento, C., Laender, A.H., da Silva, A.S., Gonçalves, M.A.: A source independent framework for research paper recommendation. In: Proceedings of International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 297–306. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nishioka, C., Große-Bölting, G., Scherp, A.: Influence of time on user profiling and recommending researchers in social media. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-Driven Business (i-KNOW). ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: Profiling vs. time vs. content: what does matter for top-k publication recommendation based on Twitter profiles? In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 171–180. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaffer, J.P.: Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(395), 826–831 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugiyama, K., Kan, M.Y.: Scholarly paper recommendation via user’s recent research interests. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sugiyama, K., Kan, M.Y.: Towards higher relevance and serendipity in scholarly paper recommendation. In: ACM SIGWEB Newsletter (Winter), p. 4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 990–998. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vargas, S., Castells, P., Vallet, D.: Explicit relevance models in intent-oriented information retrieval diversification. In: Proceedings of International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp. 75–84. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chifumi Nishioka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nishioka, C., Hauke, J., Scherp, A. (2019). Research Paper Recommender System with Serendipity Using Tweets vs. Diversification. In: Jatowt, A., Maeda, A., Syn, S. (eds) Digital Libraries at the Crossroads of Digital Information for the Future. ICADL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34057-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34058-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics