Abstract
So far, a lot of works have studied research paper recommender systems. However, most of them have focused only on the accuracy and ignored the serendipity, which is an important aspect for user satisfaction. The serendipity is concerned with the novelty of recommendations and to which extent recommendations positively surprise users. In this paper, we investigate a research paper recommender system focusing on serendipity. In particular, we examine (1) whether a user’s tweets lead to a generation of serendipitous recommendations and (2) whether the use of diversification on a recommendation list improves serendipity. We have conducted an online experiment with 22 subjects in the domain of computer science. The result of our experiment shows that tweets do not improve the serendipity, despite their heterogeneous nature. However, diversification delivers serendipitous research papers that cannot be generated by a traditional strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abel, F., Herder, E., Krause, D.: Extraction of professional interests from social web profiles. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (2011)
Agrawal, R., Gollapudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying search results. In: Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), pp. 5–14. ACM (2009)
Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S., Breitinger, C.: Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 17(4), 305–338 (2016)
Bostandjiev, S., O’Donovan, J., Höllerer, T.: Taste-weights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys). ACM (2012)
Chen, J., Nairn, R., Nelson, L., Bernstein, M., Chi, E.: Short and tweet: experiments on recommending content from information streams. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM (2010)
Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., Jannach, D.: Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pp. 257–260. ACM (2010)
Goossen, F., IJntema, W., Frasincar, F., Hogenboom, F., Kaymak, U.: News personalization using the CF-IDF semantic recommender. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS). ACM (2011)
Große-Bölting, G., Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: A comparison of different strategies for automated semantic document annotation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP), pp. 8:1–8:8. ACM (2015)
Große-Bölting, G., Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: Generic process for extracting user profiles from social media using hierarchical knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Semantic Computing (IEEE ICSC), pp. 197–200. IEEE (2015)
Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1), 5–53 (2004)
Kapanipathi, P., Jain, P., Venkataramani, C., Sheth, A.: User interests identification on Twitter using a hierarchical knowledge base. In: Presutti, V., d’Amato, C., Gandon, F., d’Aquin, M., Staab, S., Tordai, A. (eds.) ESWC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8465, pp. 99–113. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_8
Letierce, J., Passant, A., Breslin, J.G., Decker, S.: Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Proceedings of Web Science Conference. Web Science Trust (2010)
Lops, P., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G.: Content-based recommender systems: state of the art and trends. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 73–105. Springer, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_3
McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1097–1101. ACM (2006)
Mendoza, J.L.: A significance test for multisample sphericity. Psychometrika 45(4), 495–498 (1980)
Nascimento, C., Laender, A.H., da Silva, A.S., Gonçalves, M.A.: A source independent framework for research paper recommendation. In: Proceedings of International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 297–306. ACM (2011)
Nishioka, C., Große-Bölting, G., Scherp, A.: Influence of time on user profiling and recommending researchers in social media. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-Driven Business (i-KNOW). ACM (2015)
Nishioka, C., Scherp, A.: Profiling vs. time vs. content: what does matter for top-k publication recommendation based on Twitter profiles? In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 171–180. ACM (2016)
Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manag. 24(5), 513–523 (1988)
Shaffer, J.P.: Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(395), 826–831 (1986)
Sugiyama, K., Kan, M.Y.: Scholarly paper recommendation via user’s recent research interests. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). ACM (2010)
Sugiyama, K., Kan, M.Y.: Towards higher relevance and serendipity in scholarly paper recommendation. In: ACM SIGWEB Newsletter (Winter), p. 4 (2015)
Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 990–998. ACM (2008)
Vargas, S., Castells, P., Vallet, D.: Explicit relevance models in intent-oriented information retrieval diversification. In: Proceedings of International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pp. 75–84. ACM (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nishioka, C., Hauke, J., Scherp, A. (2019). Research Paper Recommender System with Serendipity Using Tweets vs. Diversification. In: Jatowt, A., Maeda, A., Syn, S. (eds) Digital Libraries at the Crossroads of Digital Information for the Future. ICADL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34057-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34058-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)