Advertisement

Ultrasonic Method of Express Evaluation of the Rock Massif Disturbance

  • Khaini-Kamal Kassymkanova
  • Gulnara Jangulova
  • Gulnura Issanova
  • Venera Turekhanova
  • Yermek Zhalgasbekov
Chapter
First Online:
  • 50 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences book series (BRIEFSEARTH)

Abstract

The ultrasonic method has found wide application in mining for determining the size of the disturbed zone, and for evaluating the physical–mechanical characteristics of the mountain massif.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baikonurov OA, Melnikov VA (1970) Fundamentals of mining geophysics. Science, 326 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Beck ASh (2005) The use of GIS technologies in the detection of active systems of cracks. In: Proceedings of International Scientific and Prak Conference “Agoshkov Readings, IPCON RAS, pp 91–95 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  3. Fisenko G (1968) On the state and tasks of laboratory and full-scale tests of the strength and deformability of rocks, Tr. ATTENTION (In Russian)Google Scholar
  4. Galiev SZh, Shamganova S (2012) Geomechanical justification of the boundaries and development of an automated system for corporate monitoring and management of the geotechnological complex of mining of gold-mining deposits Vasilkovskoe, Suzdal and others, Report on research. Works of Institute of Mining named after D. A. Kunaev, 67 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Galustyan EL (1989) Artificial strengthening of unstable areas of quarry boards. Occup Saf Ind 12:23–25 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  6. GOST 21153.0-75 (1975) Mountain rocks. Sampling and general requirements for physical testing methods. State Committee for Standards, 35pGoogle Scholar
  7. Iofis MA, Grishin AV (2005) The nature and mechanism of the formation of concentrated deformations in the mold of shifting. Min Inf Anal Bull 7:82–86 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Jangulova GK, Tulebaev KK (2014) Conducting laboratory tests to determine the physico-mechanical characteristics of rock samples. Report on research. Funds IGD them. YES. Kunaev, 28 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Kasymkanova HM (2007) A technique for studying the strength properties in a dump scientific and technical support of mining. Proc Min Inst 73:233–236 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Kasymkanova KhM, Kirgizbaeva G et al (2004) Methodological recommendations for the assessment of the stability of the massifs of the quarries Akzhal. KazNTU, 24p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  11. Kasymkanova KhM (2006) Difficulty predicting large-scale destruction of the sides of quarries. Scientific and technical support of mining. Proc Min Inst 71:12–18 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Korolev YuK (1994) Opinion of a specialist. GIS-Review, pp 5–8 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  13. Maistrovsky MA, Tulebaev KК (2010) Stability of the side of the quarry taking into account the internal dumping. Collection of works of Institute of Mining named after D.A. Kunayev 78:3 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  14. Mashanov AZh, Nurpeisova MB (2000) Geomechanics. KazNTU, 124 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Maystrovsky, Rozhkovsky GF (2010) Program Sustainability (Version 3.2—1974) (In Russian)Google Scholar
  16. Methodical instructions (1988) Converters piezoelectric PRIZ-12. Chisinau, 123 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Nurpeisova MB, Kasymkanova HM, Kirgizbaeva GM (2006) Methodical recommendations for assessing the stability of the angles of inclination of the ledges and sides of the quarry of the Zherek deposit, 24 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Okatov RP, Nizametdinov FK, Tsai BN, Bondarenko TT (2003) Accounting for the time and temperature factors in the construction of rock strength criteria 2:38–42 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  19. Popov II, Nizametdinov FK, Okatov RP (1997) Natural and technogenic foundations of management of stability of ledges and sides of quarry. Gylym 215 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  20. Report № 003219. (2001) Instrumental control over the stability condition of the sideboard massifs of the Sayaksky quarry. KarPTI, 25 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  21. Report No. 619-90 / 24. UNIPROMED. (1980) Investigate the stability of the sides of the ledges of the Kounrad pit and develop recommendations for the safe management of mining operations. Sverdlovsk, 180 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Savich AI et al. (1969) Seismoacoustic methods for studying rock massifs. Nedra, 240 p (In Russian)Google Scholar
  23. Tsai BN, Bondarenko TT, Malakhov AA, Amanbaev BZh (2005) Accounting for the rheological properties of rocks in assessing the stability of mine workings. Actual Problems of the Mining and Metallurgical Complex of Kazakhstan, pp 121–123 (In Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Yakovlev VL (2009) State, problems and ways to improve open mining developments. Min J 11:11–14 (In Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khaini-Kamal Kassymkanova
    • 1
  • Gulnara Jangulova
    • 2
  • Gulnura Issanova
    • 3
  • Venera Turekhanova
    • 4
  • Yermek Zhalgasbekov
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Geography and EnvironmentAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  2. 2.Faculty of Geography and EnvironmentAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  3. 3.Faculty of Geography and Environment, Research Center for Ecology and Environment of Central AsiaAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  4. 4.Faculty of Geography and EnvironmentAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan
  5. 5.Faculty of Geography and EnvironmentAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityAlmatyKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options