Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Human Person

Abstract

This book introduces the Aristotelian-Thomistic (A-T) view of the human person and reviews the ways in which this view could provide a philosophically sound foundation for modern psychology. In this chapter, we review the current state of psychology and argue that the current philosophical foundations are lacking, both in that they are not philosophically sound in themselves and in that they create problems for modern psychology as a unified discipline. We then discuss what A-T philosophical psychology has to offer, specifically, and discuss the A-T tradition in the context of the modern understanding of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brennan, R. E. (1941). Thomistic psychology: A philosophic analysis of the nature of man. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2006). Restoration of reason: The eclipse and recovery of truth, goodness, and beauty. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E. A. (1925). The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science; A historical and critical essay. London, UK: K. Paul, Trench & Trubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. R. (2013). Mind, body, world: Foundations of cognitive science. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2006). Philosophy of mind: A beginner’s guide. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2008). The last superstition: A refutation of the new atheism. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2009). Aquinas: A beginner’s guide. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2015). Neo-scholastic essays. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2019). Aristotle’s revenge: The metaphysical foundations of physical and biological science. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones scholasticae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, G. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hovhannisyan, G. (2018). Humanistic cognitive science. The Humanistic Psychologist, 46(1), 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koons, R. C., Simpson, W. M., & Teh, N. J. (2017). Introduction: Reflections on contemporary science and the new Aristotelianism. In W. M. Simpson, R. C. Koons, & N. J. Teh (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian perspectives on contemporary science (pp. 15–26). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugelmann, R. J. (2005). Neoscholastic psychology revisited. History of Psychology, 8(2), 131–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. D. (2013). Mind, matter & nature: A Thomistic proposal for the philosophy of mind. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. (1909). Psychology: Empirical and rational (6th ed.). London, UK: Longmans & Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, D. (1918). The origins of contemporary psychology. London, UK: R. & T. Washbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N. (1981). An intellectual history of psychology (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. N., & Williams, R. N. (2014). Scientism: The new orthodoxy. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. M., Koons, R. C., & Teh, N. J. (Eds.). (2017). Neo-Aristotelian perspectives on contemporary science. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, J. M., Hancock, C., & Sweetman, B. (2000). The search for a philosophy of science in psychology. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 5(1), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, J. M., Kostelecky, M., Spalding, T. L., & Gagné, C. L. (2016). Scientific realism, psychological realism, and Aristotelian–Thomistic realism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 37(3/4), 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, C. S. (2006). Resilience and the virtue of fortitude: Aquinas in dialogue with the psychosocial sciences. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spalding, T.L., Stedman, J.M., Gagné, C.L., Kostelecky, M. (2019). Introduction. In: The Human Person. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33912-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics