Skip to main content

Towards a Quality Framework for Immersive Media Experiences: A Holistic Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2019)

Abstract

Immersive Media Technologies have emerged as popular media form. Their captivating nature makes them a powerful tool for participation and storytelling in a variety of domains attracting multidisciplinary interest. Existing frameworks for user-perceived quality in immersive media experiences are limited due to their exclusion of narrative dimensions. This research expands upon the current system-centered Quality of Experience framework by including Content Influence Factors based on learnings from IDN. Hence proposing a conceptual framework for measuring immersive media experiences, which comprise of four constructs: Form, Content, User, and Context. These components are interrelated through their overlapping dimensions, which is discussed through the course of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allcoat, D., von Mühlenen, A.: Learning in virtual reality: effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Res. Learn. Technol. 26, 2140 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, K.: There is nothing virtual about immersion: narrative immersion for VR and other interfaces (2003). http://alumni.media.mit.edu/~brooks/storybiz/immersiveNotVirtual.pdf. Accessed May 2007

  3. Brunnström, K., et al.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. Random House, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances, Hilldale, USA, vol. 1, no. 2 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gigliotti, C.: Aesthetics of a virtual world. Leonardo 28(4), 289–295 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes, R.: The design of narrative as an immersive simulation, Vancouver, CA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guntuku, S.C., Lin, W., Scott, M.J., Ghinea, G.: Modelling the influence of personality and culture on affect and enjoyment in multimedia. In: 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), pp. 236–242. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heeter, C.: Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(2), 262–271 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hupont, I., Gracia, J., Sanagustin, L., Gracia, M.A.: How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE? A use case of serious gaming with Oculus Rift. In: 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. IJsselsteijn, W.A., De Ridder, H., Freeman, J., Avons, S.E.: Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement. In: Human vision and electronic imaging V, vol. 3959, pp. 520–529. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keighrey, C., Flynn, R., Murray, S., Murray, N.: A QoE evaluation of immersive augmented and virtual reality speech & language assessment applications. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Callet, P., Möller, S., Perkis, A., et al.: Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience. In: European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003), vol. 3, no. 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, K.M.: Presence, explicated. Commun. Theory 14(1), 27–50 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murray, N., Qiao, Y., Lee, B., Muntean, G.M., Karunakar, A.: Age and gender influence on perceived olfactory & visual media synchronization. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson, N.C., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S.: Immersion revisited: a review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Hum. Technol. 12, 108–134 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedroli, E., et al.: Characteristics, usability, and users experience of a system combining cognitive and physical therapy in a virtual environment: positive bike. Sensors 18(7), 2343 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter, U., et al.: Factors influencing quality of experience. In: Möller, S., Raake, A. (eds.) Quality of Experience. TSTS, pp. 55–72. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowe, J.P., McQuiggan, S.W., Lester, J.C.: Narrative presence in intelligent learning environments. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Intelligent Narrative Technologies, pp. 127–134 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ryan, M.L.: Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, vol. 2. JHU Press, Baltimore (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schatz, R., Sackl, A., Timmerer, C., Gardlo, B.: Towards subjective quality of experience assessment for omnidirectional video streaming. In: 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(1), 120–126 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin, N.: Online learner’s ‘flow’experience: an empirical study. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 37(5), 705–720 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slater, M.: A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3), 1–5 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tyndiuk, F., Lespinet-Najib, V., Thomas, G., Schlick, C.: Impact of tasks and users’ characteristics on virtual reality performance. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 10(3), 444–452 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tyng, C.M., Amin, H.U., Saad, M.N., Malik, A.S.: The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Front. Psychol. 8, 1454 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, Y., Heynderickx, I., Redi, J.A.: Understanding the role of social context and user factors in video quality of experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 412–426 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shafaq Irshad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hameed, A., Irshad, S., Perkis, A. (2019). Towards a Quality Framework for Immersive Media Experiences: A Holistic Approach. In: Cardona-Rivera, R., Sullivan, A., Young, R. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33893-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33894-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics