Abstract
Aligned with the technological developments of electron-based characterization techniques, our theoretical frameworks are yet to be adapted to the strong-laser and slow-electron regimes. More specifically, there exist certain domains where our adiabatic approximations might break down. This is practically important from several viewpoints: (i) in PPM, the shape and amplitude of electron beams are both strongly manipulated, in addition to their phase; (ii) even in free-space electron-light interactions, purely elastic approximations might appear to be a mere over-simplification (Kozak et al. in Nat Phys Lett, 2017 [1]); (iii) during the interaction of electron beams with gratings and light, electron bunching appears to be an additional mechanism to the electron acceleration, where both the acceleration and bunching mechanisms are controlled by the longitudinal broadening of the electron beam relative to the grating period (Talebi in New J Phys 18:123006, 2016 [2]); and (iv) shaped electron beams interacting with matter have different selection rules and might offer approaches for manipulating the electron-induced radiations (Sergeeva et al. in Opt Express 25:26310–26328, 2017 [3]; Tsesses et al. in Phys Rev A 95:013832, 2017 [4]; Kaminer et al. in Phys Rev X 6:011006, 2016 [5]). The last point is fundamentally important, as even for a single electron wave packet, when the electron beam is in a superposition of at least two momentum states, interferences between different quantum paths in the interaction of photons with the electron may occur (Peatross et al. in Phys Rev Lett 100:153601, 2008 [6]). As noted by Keitel and co-workers, the quantum eigenstates of electrons in a nonplanar laser beam or in general shaped light waves are unknown (Peatross et al. in Phys Rev Lett 100:153601, 2008 [6]). For this reason, the development of self-consistent numerical methods may facilitate a better understanding of the outcomes of experiments (Talebi in New J Phys 18:123006, 2016 [2]; White et al. in Phys Rev B 86:205324, 2012 [7]; Kohn et al. in Phys Rev 140:1133, 1965 [8]) and stimulate the design of new experiments.
Portions of the text of this chapter have been re-published with permission from [9], re-printed under the CC BY license; [10], re-printed under the CC BY license.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M. Kozak, T. Eckstein, N. Schonenberger, P. Hommelhoff, Inelastic ponderomotive scattering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum. Nat. Phys. Lett. advance online publication, 10/09/2017 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4282, http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/nphys4282.html#supplementary-information
N. Talebi, Schrödinger electrons interacting with optical gratings: quantum mechanical study of the inverse Smith-Purcell effect. New J. Phys. 18(12), 123006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/12/123006
D.Y. Sergeeva, A.P. Potylitsyn, A.A. Tishchenko, M.N. Strikhanov, Smith-Purcell radiation from periodic beams. Opt. Express 25(21), 26310–26328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/Oe.25.026310. (in English)
S. Tsesses, G. Bartal, I. Kaminer, Light generation via quantum interaction of electrons with periodic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. A 95(1), 013832 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.95.013832. (in English)
I. Kaminer et al., Quantum Cerenkov radiation: spectral cutoffs and the role of spin and orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. X 6(1), 011006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.6.011006. (in English)
J. Peatross, C. Muller, K.Z. Hatsagortsyan, C.H. Keitel, Photoemission of a single-electron wave packet in a strong laser field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(15), 153601 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.153601. (in English)
A.J. White, M. Sukharev, M. Galperin, Molecular nanoplasmonics: self-consistent electrodynamics in current-carrying junctions. Phys. Rev. B 86(20), 205324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.205324
W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140(4A), 1133 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133. (in English)
N. Talebi, Electron-light interactions beyond the adiabatic approximation: recoil engineering and spectral interferometry AU—Talebi. Nahid. Adv. Phys. X 3(1), 1499438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2018.1499438
N. Talebi, C. Lienau, Interference between quantum paths in coherent Kapitza-Dirac effect. New J. Phys. (2019) [Online]. Available http://iopscience.iop.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab3ce3
O. Smirnova, M. Spanner, M. Ivanov, Analytical solutions for strong field-driven atomic and molecular one- and two-electron continua and applications to strong-field problems. Phys. Rev. A 77(3), 033407 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.77.033407. (in English)
D.M. Wolkow, On a mass of solutions of the Dirac equation. Z. Angew. Phys. 94(3–4), 250–260 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01331022. (in German)
E. Kasper, Generalization of Schrodingers wave mechanics for relativistic regions of validity. Z. Naturforsch. A, A28(2), 216–221 (1973) [Online]. Available: <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1973S611900009 (in German)
S.T. Park, Propagation of a relativistic electron wave packet in the Dirac equation. Phys. Rev. A 86(6), 062105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.86.062105. (in English)
S.T. Park, M.M. Lin, A.H. Zewail, Photon-induced near-field electron microscopy (PINEM): theoretical and experimental. New J. Phys. 12, 123028 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123028. (in English)
F.J.G. de Abajo, A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Kociak, Multiphoton absorption and emission by interaction of swift electrons with evanescent light fields. Nano Lett. 10(5), 1859–1863 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl100613s. (in English)
D. Wolf et al., 3D magnetic induction maps of nanoscale materials revealed by electron holographic tomography. Chem. Mater. 27(19), 6771–6778 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02723. (in English)
R.O. Jones, O. Gunnarsson, The density functional formalism, its applications and prospects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61(3), 689–746 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.61.689. (in English)
EJ. Baerends, Perspective on self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects; W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 140, 1133–1138 (in English), Theor. Chem. Acc. 103(3–4), 265–269 (2000). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002140050031 (in English)
B. Walker, R. Gebauer, Ultrasoft pseudopotentials in time-dependent density-functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 127(16), 164106 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2786999. (in English)
J. Harris, R.O. Jones, Pseudopotentials in density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41(3), 191–194 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.41.191. (in English)
E. Runge, E.K.U. Gross, Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52(12), 997–1000 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997. (in English)
X.S. Li, S.M. Smith, A.N. Markevitch, D.A. Romanov, R.J. Levis, H.B. Schlegel, A time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach for studying the electronic optical response of molecules in intense fields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7(2), 233–239 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1039/b415849k. (in English)
P.W. Hawkes, E. Kasper, Principles of Electron Optics (Academic Press, London, 1996)
N.W. Ashcroft, N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Thomson Learning Inc., United States of America, 1976)
H. Tal-Ezer, R. Kosloff, An accurate and efficient scheme for propagating the time dependent Schrödinger equation. J. Chem. Phys. 81(9), 3967–3971 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448136
X.J. Shen, A. Lozano, W. Dong, H.F. Busnengo, X.H. Yan, towards bond selective chemistry from first principles: methane on metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(4), 046101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.046101
L. Gaudreau et al., Coherent control of three-spin states in a triple quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 8, 54. 11/27/2011 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2149, https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2149#supplementary-information
J. Hansom et al., Environment-assisted quantum control of a solid-state spin via coherent dark states. Nat. Phys. 10, 725, 09/07/2014 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3077, https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3077#supplementary-information
I.S. Mark, Ultrafast nanoplasmonics under coherent control. New J. Phys. 10(2), 025031 [online], http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/10/i=2/a=025031
R.P. Feynman, Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 20(2), 367–387 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.20.367
M. Li et al., Classical-Quantum correspondence for above-threshold ionization. Phy. Rev. Lett. 112(11), 113002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.113002
D.B. Milošević, W. Becker, Improved strong-field approximation and quantum-orbit theory: application to ionization by a bicircular laser field. Phys. Rev. A 93(6), 063418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063418
A. Zaïr et al., Quantum path interferences in high-order harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(14), 143902 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.143902
P. Salieres et al., Feynman’s path-integral approach for intense-laser-atom interactions. Science 292(5518), 902–905 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108836. (in English)
T.C. Weinacht, J. Ahn, P.H. Bucksbaum, Controlling the shape of a quantum wavefunction. Nature 397, 233 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/16654
A. Feist, K.E. Echternkamp, J. Schauss, S.V. Yalunin, S. Schafer, C. Ropers, Quantum coherent optical phase modulation in an ultrafast transmission electron microscope. Nature 521(7551), 200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14463. (in English)
K.E. Echternkamp, A. Feist, S. Schafer, C. Ropers, Ramsey-type phase control of free-electron beams. Nat. Phys. 12(11), 1000 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3844. (in English)
H. Batelaan, Colloquium: Illuminating the Kapitza-Dirac effect with electron matter optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79(3), 929–941 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.79.929. (in English)
P.L. Kapitza, P.A.M. Dirac, The reflection of electrons from standing light waves. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 29(2), 297–300 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100011105
A. Howie, Photon interactions for electron microscopy applications. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 54(3), 33502 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2010100353
H. Batelaan, The Kapitza-Dirac effect. Contemp. Phys. 41(6), 369–381 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510010001220. (in English)
F.J. García de Abajo, Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(1), 209–275 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.82.209
R.F. Harrington, Time-harmonic electromagnetic fields (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1961)
A. Howie, Stimulated excitation electron microscopy and spectroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 151, 116–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.09.006. (in English)
M. Kozak, T. Eckstein, N. Schonenberger, P. Hommelho, Inelastic ponderomotive scattering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum. Nat. Phys. 14(2), 121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4282. (in English)
M. Kozak, N. Schonenberger, P. Hommelhoff, Ponderomotive generation and detection of attosecond free-electron pulse trains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(10), 103203 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.120.103203. (in English)
J. Vogelsang et al., Plasmonic-nanofocusing-based electron holography. Acs Photonics 5(9), 3584–3593 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00418
J. Kempe, Quantum random walks: an introductory overview. Contemp. Phys. 44(4), 307–327 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/00107151031000110776. (in English)
S. Aaronson, A. Arkhipov, The computational complexity of linear optics. Acm S. Theory Comput. 333–342 (2011) [Online]. Available <GotoISI>://WOS:000297656800035. (in English)
N. Spagnolo et al., Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling. Nat. Photonics 8(8), 615–620 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/Nphoton.2014.135. (in English)
L. Sansoni et al., Two-particle Bosonic-Fermionic Quantumwalk via integrated photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(1), 010502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.108.010502. (in English)
R. Garciamolina, A. Grasmarti, A. Howie, R.H. Ritchie, Retardation effects in the interaction of charged-particle beams with bounded condensed media. J. Phys. C. Solid State. 18(27), 5335–5345 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/18/27/019. (in English)
F.J.G. de Abajo, A. Rivacoba, N. Zabala, N. Yamamoto, Boundary effects in cherenkov radiation. Phys. Rev. B 69(15), 155420 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.69.155420. (in English)
C. Luo, M. Ibanescu, S.G. Johnson, J.D. Joannopoulos, Cerenkov radiation in photonic crystals. Science 299(5605), 368–371 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079549. (in English)
N. Yamamoto, F.J.G. de Abajo, V. Myroshnychenko, Interference of surface plasmons and Smith-Purcell emission probed by angle-resolved cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 91(12), 125144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.91.125144. (in English)
K. Mizuno, J. Pae, T. Nozokido, K. Furuya, Experimental evidence of the inverse Smith-Purcell effect. Nature 328(6125), 45–47 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/328045a0
A. Asenjo-Garcia, F.J.G. de Abajo, Plasmon electron energy-gain spectroscopy. New J. Phys. 15, 103021 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/15/10/103021. (in English)
J.P. Verboncoeur, Particle simulation of plasmas: review and advances. Plasma Phys. Contr. F. 47, A231–A260 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/47/5A/017. (in English)
A. Fallahi, F. Kartner, Field-based DGTD/PIC technique for general and stable simulation of interaction between light and electron bunches. J. Phys. B Mol. Opt. 47(23), 234015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/23/234015. (in English)
J.-L. Vay, Simulation of beams or plasmas crossing at relativistic velocity. Phys. Plasmas 15(5), 056701 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2837054
B. Naranjo, A. Valloni, S. Putterman, J.B. Rosenzweig, Stable charged-particle acceleration and focusing in a laser accelerator using spatial Harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(16), 164803 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.109.164803
J. Breuer, J. McNeur, P. Hommelhoff, Dielectric laser acceleration of electrons in the vicinity of single and double grating structures—theory and simulations. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47(23), 234004 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/23/234004
M. Ferrario et al., IRIDE: Interdisciplinary research infrastructure based on dual electron linacs and lasers. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 740, 138–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.11.040
E.A. Peralta et al., Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure. Nature 503, 91, 11/06/2013 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12664, https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12664#supplementary-information
J. Breuer, P. Hommelhoff, Laser-based acceleration of nonrelativistic electrons at a dielectric structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(13), 134803 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.111.134803
P. Baum, On the physics of ultrashort single-electron pulses for time-resolved microscopy and diffraction. Chem. Phys. 423, 55–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.06.012
L. Kasmi, D. Kreier, M. Bradler, E. Riedle, P. Baum, Femtosecond single-electron pulses generated by two-photon photoemission close to the work function. New J. Phys. 17(3), 033008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033008
J. Hoffrogge et al., Tip-based source of femtosecond electron pulses at 30 keV. J. Appl. Phys. 115(9), 094506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867185
B. Piglosiewicz et al., Carrier-envelope phase effects on the strong-field photoemission of electrons from metallic nanostructures. Nat. Photonics 8, 37, 11/10/2013 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.288, https://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2013.288#supplementary-information
M. Aidelsburger, F.O. Kirchner, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Single-electron pulses for ultrafast diffraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(46), 19714–19719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010165107
M. Krüger, M. Schenk, M. Förster, P. Hommelhoff, Attosecond physics in photoemission from a metal nanotip. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45(7), 074006 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/45/7/074006
G. Herink, D.R. Solli, M. Gulde, C. Ropers, Field-driven photoemission from nanostructures quenches the quiver motion. Nature 483, 190, 03/07/2012 [online], https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10878, https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10878#supplementary-information
B. Barwick, C. Corder, J. Strohaber, N. Chandler-Smith, C. Uiterwaal, H. Batelaan, Laser-induced ultrafast electron emission from a field emission tip. New J. Phys. 9(5), 142 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/5/142
B. Schröder, M. Sivis, R. Bormann, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, An ultrafast nanotip electron gun triggered by grating-coupled surface plasmons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(23), 231105 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937121
M. Müller, V. Kravtsov, A. Paarmann, M.B. Raschke, R. Ernstorfer, Nanofocused plasmon-driven sub-10 fs electron point Source. Acs Photonics 3(4), 611–619 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00710
K.E. Echternkamp, G. Herink, S.V. Yalunin, K. Rademann, S. Schäfer, C. Ropers, Strong-field photoemission in nanotip near-fields: from quiver to sub-cycle electron dynamics. Appl. Phys. B J 122(4), 80 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-016-6351-x
C. Kealhofer, W. Schneider, D. Ehberger, A. Ryabov, F. Krausz, P. Baum, All-optical control and metrology of electron pulses. Science 352(6284), 429–433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aae0003
A. Gliserin, M. Walbran, P. Baum, A high-resolution time-of-flight energy analyzer for femtosecond electron pulses at 30 keV. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87(3), 033302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942912
J. Vogelsang et al., Ultrafast electron emission from a sharp metal nanotaper driven by Adiabatic nanofocusing of surface plasmons. Nano Lett. 15(7), 4685–4691 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01513
A. Gliserin, A. Apolonski, F. Krausz, P. Baum, Compression of single-electron pulses with a microwave cavity. New J. Phys. 14, 073055 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073055. (in English)
P.G. Etchegoin, E.C. Le Ru, M. Meyer, An analytic model for the optical properties of gold. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 127(18), 164705, 189901 (2006, 2007). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2802403 (in English)
P.G. Etchegoin, E.C. Le Ru, M. Meyer, An analytic model for the optical properties of gold. J. Chem. Phys. 125(16), 164705 (2006). Doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2360270
R.M. Joseph, A. Taflove, FDTD Maxwell’s equations models for nonlinear electrodynamics and optics. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 45(3), 364–374 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/8.558652
D. Ehberger et al., Highly coherent electron beam from a laser-triggered tungsten needle tip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(22), 227601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.227601. (in English)
D. Gabor, A new microscopic principle. Nature 161(4098), 777–778 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1038/161777a0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Talebi, N. (2019). Electron-Light Interactions Beyond Adiabatic Approximation. In: Near-Field-Mediated Photon–Electron Interactions. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33816-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33816-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33815-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33816-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)