Abstract
In this contribution, we discuss some basic mechanical and mathematical features of the finite element technology for elliptic boundary value problems. Originating from an engineering perspective, we will introduce step by step of some basic mathematical concepts in order to set a basis for a deeper discussion of the rigorous mathematical approaches. In this context, we consider the boundedness of functions, the classification of the smoothness of functions, classical and mixed variational formulations as well as the \(H^{-1}\)-FEM in linear elasticity. Another focus is on the analysis of saddle point problems occurring in several mixed finite element formulations, especially on the solvability and stability of the associated discretized versions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
nonnegative real values \(\mathbb {R}^+_0\), positive real values \(\mathbb {R}^+=\mathbb {R}^+_0\backslash 0\).
- 2.
positive integers \(\mathrm{I\! N}_+=\{1,2,3,\dots \},\) nonnegative integers \(\mathrm{I\! N}_0=\{0,1,2,3,\dots \}=\mathrm{I\! N}_+ \cup \{0\}\).
- 3.
The derivatives occurring in \(H^m({\mathcal B})\) have to be interpreted as weak or generalized derivatives. Classical derivatives are functions defined pointwise on an interval. A weak derivative need only to be locally integrable. If the function is sufficiently smooth, e.g., \(v\in C^m(\overline{{\mathcal B}})\), then its weak derivatives \(D^\alpha u\) coincide with the classical ones for \(|\alpha |\le m\).
- 4.
Note that a restriction to homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions is only of technical nature and does not constitute a loss of generality, see, e.g., Braess (1997).
References
Auricchio, F., Brezzi, F., & Lovadina, C. (2004). Mixed finite element methods. In E. Stein, R. de Borst, & T. J. R. Hughes (Eds.), Encyclopedia of computational mechanics (Chap. 9, pp. 238–277). Wiley and Sons.
Bathe, K.-J. (1996). Finite element procedures. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Becker, E. B., Carey, G. F. & Oden, J. T. (1981). Finite elements, an introduction: Volume I. Prentice-Hall.
Berdichevsky, V. L. (2009). Variational principles of continuum mechanics. Springer.
Boffi, D., Brezzi, F., & Fortin, M. (2009). Reduced symmetry elements in linear elasticity. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 8, 95–121.
Boffi, D., Brezzi, F., & Fortin, M. (2013). Mixed finite element methods and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.
Braess, D. (1997). Finite elemente (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Brenner, S. C. & Scott, L. R. (2002). The mathematical theory of finite element methods. In Texts in applied mathematics (Vol. 15, 2nd edition). New York: Springer.
Brezzi F. (1974). On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from lagrangian multipliers. Revue française d’automatique, informatique, recherche opérationnelle. Analyse numérique, 8(2), 129–151.
Chapelle, D., & Bathe, K.-J. (1993). The inf-sup test. Computers and Structures, 47, 537–545.
Crouzeix, M., & Raviart, P.-A. (1973). Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary stokes equations i. Revue francaise d’automatique, informatique, recherche operationnelle, 7(3), 33–75.
Devendran, D., May, S., & Corona, E. (2009). Computational fluid dynamics reading group: Finite element methods for stokes and the infamous inf-sup condition.
Ern, A., & Guermond, J.-L. (2013). Theory and practice of finite elements (Vol. 159). Springer Science & Business Media.
Gockenbach, M. S. (2006). Understanding and implementing the finite element method. SIAM.
Goebbels, S. (2015). An inequality for negative norms with application to errors of finite element methods.
Hood, P., & Taylor, C. (1974). Navier-stokes equations using mixed interpolation. In J. T. Oden, O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. H. Gallagher, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Finite element methods in flow problems (pp. 121–132). UAH Press.
Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The finite element method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kendall, R. P., & Wheeler, M. F. (1976). A Crank-Nicolson H\(^{-1}\)-Galerkin procedure for parabolic problems in a single-space variable. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 13, 861–876.
Oden, J. T., & Carey, G. F. (1983). Finite elements. Mathematical aspects. Volume IV. Prentice-Hall.
Oden, J. T., & Reddy, J. N. (1976). An introduction to the mathematical theory of finite elements. Wiley.
Rachford, H. H., Wheeler, J. R., & Wheeler, M. F. (1974). An H\(^{-1}\)-Galerkin procedure for the two-point boundary value problem. In C. de Boor (Ed.), Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations, Proceedings of Symposium, Conducted by the Mathematics Research Center, The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Academic Press.
Royden, H. L. (1968). Real analysis. New York: Macmillan.
Thomée, V. (1980). Negative norm estimates and superconvergence in Galerkin methods for parabolic problems. Mathematics of Computation, 34(149), 93–113.
Thomée, V. (2006). Galerkin finite element methods for parabolic problems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Wriggers, P. (2008). Nonlinear finite element methods. Springer.
Acknowledgements
We thank the DFG for the financial support within the SPP 1748 Reliable Simulation Techniques in Solid Mechanics. Development of Non-standard Discretization Methods, Mechanical and Mathematical Analysis, project Novel finite elements— Mixed, Hybrid and Virtual Element formulations (Projectnumber: 255432295) (SCHR 570/23-2). I would also like to thank Nils Viebahn for helpful discussions and his help with the manuscript and Sascha Maassen and Rainer Niekamp for the implementation of the \(H^{-1}\)procedure and accompanying discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
A Sobolev and Hilbert Spaces
A Sobolev and Hilbert Spaces
In the following we will use the Sobolev and Hilbert Spaces, they are based on the space of square integrable functions on \({\mathcal B}\):
Let \(s \ge 0\) be a real number, the standard notation for a Sobolev space is \(H^s ({\mathcal B}) \) and \(H^s (\partial {\mathcal B}) \) with the inner products and norm
respectively. For \(s = 0\) the space \(H^0 ({\mathcal B}) \) represents the Hilbert space \(L^2 ({\mathcal B}) \) of all square integrable functions, i.e.,
If s is a positive integer the spaces \(H^s ({\mathcal B}) \) consist of all square integrable functions whose derivatives up to the order s are also square integrable, i.e.,
Here we shall use the semi-norms
and the norm
Critism: This expression for the norm does not take into account a typical length scale l of the problem, i.e., we are adding, for example, a square integrable function \( |u|^2_{L^2 ({\mathcal B})}\) and its square integrable derivative \( |u^{\prime }|^2_{L^2 ({\mathcal B})}\). Without any physically meaningful parameters these expression is hardly to interpret. This could be avoided by using the expression
where d characterizes the dimension of \({\mathcal B}\subset \mathbb {R}^{\text {d} }\), Boffi et al. (2013).
With \({\text {D}}^{\alpha }\) as the \(\alpha \)-st weak differential operator. Thus the often used spaces \( H^1 ({\mathcal B}) \) and \( H^1_0 ({\mathcal B}) \) are defined by
and
For completeness we introduce the spaces \( H^2 ({\mathcal B}) \) and \( H^2_0 ({\mathcal B}) \) defined by
and
For negative superscripts, i.e., \(H^{-s} ({\mathcal B}) \) with \( s > 0\), the spaces are identified with the duals of \(H^{s}_0 ({\mathcal B}) \):
For example, the norm associated to \(H^{-1} ({\mathcal B}) \), which is the dual of \(H^{1}_0 ({\mathcal B}) \), is defined as
The norm associated to \(H^{-{}^{1}\!/_{2}} (\partial {\mathcal B}) \), the dual of \(H^{{}^{1}\!/_{2}}_0 (\partial {\mathcal B}) \), is defined as
The Hilbert space \(H_0^{m} ({\mathcal B}) \) is a closed subspace of \(H^{m} ({\mathcal B}) \); furthermore is \(H_0^{0} ({\mathcal B}) = L_{2} ({\mathcal B}) \).
For tensorial Sobolev spaces, e.g., the three-dimensional tensor product space
we use the abbreviation
Let \({{\varvec{u}}}\in \mathbb {R}^3\) and set the Hilbert space
with the associated norm
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schröder, J. (2020). Engineering Notes on Concepts of the Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. In: Schröder, J., de Mattos Pimenta, P. (eds) Novel Finite Element Technologies for Solids and Structures. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33520-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33520-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33519-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33520-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)