Skip to main content

A New Discounting Approach to Conflict Information Fusion Using Multi-criteria of Reliability in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances on Broad-Band Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 97))

Abstract

Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DSET) is an important tool to combine uncertain and imprecise information from multiple sources. However, when combining information with highly conflict, it will lead counterintuitive results. A lot of research has been done to resolve the problem. In this paper, we focus on the approach to revise the basic probability assignment of information (evidence) through discount factors. Two methods are proposed to computer discount factors by multi-criteria of reliability measurement. Then we combine multi-source information in the improved Dempster’s rule. Finally, some numerical examples are used to illustrate the efficiency of our proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by multivalued mapping. Annu. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zadeh, L.A.: Review of ‘‘a mathematics theory of evidence’’. AI Mag. 5(3), 81–83 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dezert, J.: Foundations for a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning. Inf. Secur. 9, 13–57 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lefevre, E., Colot, O., Vannoorenberghe, P.: Belief function combination and the conflict management. Inf. Fusion 3(2), 149–162 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(5), 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis. Support Syst. 29(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xia, J., Feng, Y., Liu, L., Liu, D., Fei, L.: An evidential reliability indicator-based fusion rule for Dempster-Shafer theory and its applications in classification. IEEE Access 6, 24912–24924 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marhic, B., et al.: An evidential approach for detection of abnormal behaviour in the presence of unreliable sensors. Inf. Fusion 13(2), 146–160 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huynh, V.-N.: Discounting and combination scheme in evidence theory for dealing with conflict in information fusion. In: MDAI 2009, pp. 217–230 (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Frikha, A.: On the use of a multi-criteria approach for reliability estimation in belief function theory. Inf. Fusion 18, 20–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Oliveira Silva, L.G., de Almeida Filho, A.T.: A multicriteria approach for analysis of conflicts in evidence theory. Inf. Sci. 346–347, 275–285 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarabi-Jamab, A., Araabi, B.N.: How to decide when the sources of evidence are unreliable: a multi-criteria discounting approach in the Dempster-Shafer theory. Inf. Sci. 448–449, 233–248 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yager, R.R.: Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of evidence. Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions, pp. 291–310 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A note on measures of specificity for fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10(4), 279–283 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Klir, G.J., Parviz, B.: A note on the measure of discord. In: UAI 1992, pp. 138–141 (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Jousselme, A.-L., Grenier, D., Bossé, É.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf. Fusion 2(2), 91–101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, A., Jousselme, A.-L., Osswald, C.: Conflict measure for the discounting operation on belief functions. In: FUSION 2008, pp. 1–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, W.: Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions. Artif. Intell. 170(11), 909–924 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yong, D., Shi, W., Zhu, Z., Qi, L.: Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis. Support Syst. 38(3), 489–493 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhu, J. (2020). A New Discounting Approach to Conflict Information Fusion Using Multi-criteria of Reliability in Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory. In: Barolli, L., Hellinckx, P., Enokido, T. (eds) Advances on Broad-Band Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications. BWCCA 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 97. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33506-9_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33506-9_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33505-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33506-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics