Skip to main content

Automatic Twitter Rumor Detection Based on LSTM Classifier

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
High-Performance Computing and Big Data Analysis (TopHPC 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 891))

Abstract

With the rapid growth of Online Social Networks (OSNs), information can spread rapidly and widely more than ever. Besides, rumors could also be easily posted and propagated in OSNs which can lead to serious social issues. The problem of identifying rumors on social networks has received considerable attention in recent years. In this research, we propose a novel automatic rumor detection method based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) classified. Our proposed method not only achieves higher accuracy, F1 score and precision but also has lower false positive rate value. Extensive experiments conducted on Twitter show that the accuracy of the proposed method is 92.45% and F1 score is 89.95%. Meanwhile, false positive rate is less than 5.01%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., Wang, Y.: Aspects of rumor spreading on a microblog network. In: Jatowt, A., et al. (eds.) SocInfo 2013. LNCS, vol. 8238, pp. 299–308. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang, G., He, W., Xu, C., Chen, L., Zeng, J.: Rumor identification in microblogging systems based on users’ behavior. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2(3), 99–108 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Misako, T., Sato, K., Sano, Y., Yamada, K., Miura, W., Hideki, T.: Rumor diffusion and convergence during the 3.11 earthquake: a Twitter case study. PLoS one  10(4), e0121443 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, A., Kumar, R., Singh, Y.N.: Rumor dynamics with acceptability factor and inoculation of nodes in scale free networks. In: 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems (SITIS), pp. 798–804 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, Z., Resnick, P., Mei, Q.: Enquiring minds: Early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 1395–1405 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vahed, Q., Rosengren, E., Radev, D.R., Mei, Q.: Rumor has it: identifying misinformation in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics pp. 1589–1599 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 675–684. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, K., Yang, S., Zhu, K.Q.: False rumors detection on sina weibo by propagation structures. In: 2015 IEEE 31st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 651–662. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, S., Liu, H., He, J., Du, X.: Detecting event rumors on sina weibo automatically. In: Ishikawa, Y., Li, J., Wang, W., Zhang, R., Zhang, W. (eds.) APWeb 2013. LNCS, vol. 7808, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37401-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dayani, R., Chhabra, N., Kadian, T., Kaushal, R.: Rumor: Detecting Misinformation in Twitter. In: 3rd Security and Privacy Symposium (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ennals, R., Byler, D., Agosta, J.M., Rosario, B.: What is disputed on the web?. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, pp. 67–74. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Twitter Inc.:Twitter (2009). http://www.twitter.com

  13. Floyd, R.W.: Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5(6), 345 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, W., Yeo, C.K., Lau, C.T., Lee, B.S.: Behavior deviation: an anomaly detection view of rumor preemption. In: 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Yeo, C.K., Lau, C.T., Lee, B.S.: Detecting rumors on online social networks using multi-layer autoencoder. In: 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), pp. 437–441. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amin Saradar Torshizi or Adel Ghazikhani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Torshizi, A.S., Ghazikhani, A. (2019). Automatic Twitter Rumor Detection Based on LSTM Classifier. In: Grandinetti, L., Mirtaheri, S., Shahbazian, R. (eds) High-Performance Computing and Big Data Analysis. TopHPC 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33495-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33495-6_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33494-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33495-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics