Skip to main content

Transnational Cooperation—The Underutilized Potential of the European LEADER Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the European LEADER rural development initiative from the perspective of transnational cooperation (TNC). This is assessed within the context of the neo-endogenous approach to rural development and described with the support of empirical materials at the European, Finnish and Spanish levels for the 2007–2013 LEADER programming period. The data show that TNC has not lived up to the expectations when it comes to the number of transnational LEADER projects actually implemented and the funding allocated for this purpose. Hence, the potential for transnational cooperation built into the LEADER approach remains underutilized. In qualitative terms all evidence supports the potential of TNC with regard to knowledge sharing and skills building. It can also provide new insights and inspiration that can strengthen rural development strategies. Transnational cooperation and connections may also foster solidarity between the different rural areas of Europe in the longer term. The constantly evolving digital technologies can enhance unprecedented levels of connectivity between the people of rural Europe and help boost the transnational character of LEADER.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The statistics for the current programming period are not worth considering at this stage because they are not up-to-date.

References

  • Dargan L, Schucksmith M (2008) Leader and innovation. Sociol Rural 48(3):274–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENRD (2011) European network for rural development. Leader transnational cooperation guide, Brussels, European network for rural development. http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/2A9A7348-B2CD-A9FB-620D-67CE880700D6.pdf

  • ENRD (2014) European network for rural development, The state-of-play of the implementation of rural development programme measure 421 in the EU-27—final report, Brussels, European network for rural development. http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/leader/leader/en/transnational-cooperation_en.html

  • ENRD (2015) European network for rural development, “Leader/CLLD 2007–2013 implementation update”. Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting. Brussels 21 April 2015. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/uploaded-files/leader1_kjasinska.pdf

  • ENRD A (No date) European network for rural development. Implementing cooperation projects under measure 421, 2007–2013. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/mo.421_2015_0.pdf

  • ENRD B (No date) European Network for Rural Development. Number of projects financed by LAGs. Available at: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/mo.412_2015_1.pdf

  • Esparcia J, Escribano J, Buciega A (2015) A perspective of LEADER method in Spain based on the analysis of local action groups. In: Granberg L, Andersson K and Kovach I (eds) Evaluating the European approach to rural development. Grass-roots experiences of the LEADER programme, pp 35–51. Ashagate, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Guide for the implementation of the measure cooperation under the Leader axis of rural development programmes for 2007–2013 (RD12/10/2006 rev.3). Brussels, European Commission, DG for agriculture and rural development. 29 Nov 2008. http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/fms/pdf/6380C18C-05AD-2120-C7ED-E8B0C6DE8377.pdf

  • Hyyryläinen T, Kuuva N, Pylkkänen P (2015) Mahdollistavaa maaseudun kehittämistä: Selvitys alueellisten ja paikallisten maaseudun kehittämissuunnitelmien vaikuttavuudesta sekä ehdotus vaikuttavuuden mittarien kehittämisestä. Paikallisen tason analyysi. Maaja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki, 2015 (Enabling rural development. A report on the effectiveness of local and regional rural development programmes and a proposal for the development of indicators. Local level analysis. Ministry of Agruculture and Forestry, Helsinki)

    Google Scholar 

  • Labianca M, De Rubertis S, Belliggiano A, Salento A (2016) Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Stud Agric Econ 118:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt D, Möllers J, Buchenrieder G (2011) Why do we need networking for European rural development policies? The implementation of LEADER and the national network for rural development in Romania. Euro-Choices 10(2):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylkkänen P, Jumppanen A (2016) Neoendogeenisia näkökulmia Leader-toimintaryhmien kansainvälistymiseen. Maaseudun uusi aika 24(1):66–78. (Neoendogenous perspectives to transnational cooperation in Leader. New rural policy 24(1)). http://www.mua-lehti.fi/neoendogeenisia-nakokulmia-leader-toimintaryhmien-kansainvalistymiseen/

  • Pylkkänen P, Jumppanen A, Tuisku S (2015) Kansainvälisyys ja paikalliskehittäminen –Selvitys kansainvälisistä LEADER-Hankkeista 2007–2013. Ruralia Instittuutti. Helsingin Yliopisto. (Transnational cooperation and local development. Analysis of the transnational cooperation projects in LEADER in 2007–2013). https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/229429

  • Ray C (2001) Transnational cooperation between rural areas: elements of a political economy of EU rural development. Sociol Rural 41(3):279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray C (2006) Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (eds) Handbook of rural studies, pp 278–292. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuesen A (2009) Is LEADER elitist or inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG boards in the 2007–2013 rural development and fisheries programmes. Sociol Rural 50:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward N, Atterton T, Lowe P, Philipson J, Thomson N (2005) Universities, the knowledge economy and “Neo-endogenous rural development”. Centre for rural economy CRE discussion paper series 1. http://www.ncl.ac.uk/cre/publish/discussionpapers/pdfs/discussionpaper1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Päivi Pylkkänen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pylkkänen, P., Hyyryläinen, T., Navarro, F. (2020). Transnational Cooperation—The Underutilized Potential of the European LEADER Method. In: Cejudo, E., Navarro, F. (eds) Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics