Skip to main content

Rural Social Innovation and Neo-endogenous Rural Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

Social innovation is an increasingly prominent agent of change in rural communities. Community groups are filling voids in rural service provision, energising nature and heritage conservation projects and supporting a range of cultural and social activities. With no sign of neo-liberalism waning, this paper explores mechanisms that can provide effective support for social innovation, with a particular focus on the EU’s LEADER approach. Drawing parallels between social innovation and neo-endogenous development, the chapter concludes that a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches is required, and the most effective outcomes arise where local groups become more empowered to make decisions within a supportive, but not over-bureaucratic, framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bosworth G, Rizzo F, Thuesen A, Marquardt D, Strijker D, Haartsen T (2016) identifying social innovation in local rural development initiatives. Innov: Eur J Soc Sci 29(4):440–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth G, Price L, Annibal I, Sellick J, Carroll T, Shepherd J (2015) LEADER as a vehicle for neo-endogenous rural development in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3):427–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth G, Price L, Annibal I, Sellick J, Carroll T, Shepherd J (2013) Reviewing the Leader approach to delivering the rural development programme in England (DEFRA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth G, Farrell H (2011) Tourism entrepreneurs in Northumberland: the role of in-migrants. Ann Tour Res 38(4):1474–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter S, Jones-Evans D (2012) Enterprise and small business; principles, practice and policy, 3rd edn. Pearson, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis D, Litzky B, Eddleston K (2009) Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: the influence of social capital and cognition. Entrep Theory Pract 33:527–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00302.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan E, Meier S, Haartsen T, Strijker D (2018) Defining ‘success’ of local citizens’ initiatives in maintaining public services in rural areas: a professional’s perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 58(2):312–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deakins D (2007) Innovation and rural SMEs: working paper series number 4. Centre for Research into Regional Development

    Google Scholar 

  • http://agro.gov.vn/images/2007/12/Innovation%20and%20Rural%20SMEs.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2019

  • DEFRA (2014) The rural development programme for England 2007–2013 annual report. https://www.theheritagealliance.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/2013-Annual-Report-to-PMC-at-14-06-23.pdf

  • EU Court of Auditors (2010) Implementation of the LEADER approach for rural development. https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR10_05/SR10_05_EN.PDF

  • Commission European (2006) The LEADER approach, a basic guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Schröter A (2009) Are more start-ups really better? Quantity and quality of new businesses and their effect on regional development. Jena Research Papers 2009-070. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/32600/1/610738550.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2013

  • Galloway L, Mochrie R (2006) Entrepreneurial motivation, orientation and realization in rural economies: a study of Scotland. Int J Entrep Innov 7(3):173–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler M, Wolfe D, Garkut D (2000) No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy. Rev Int Polit Econ 7(4):688–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz D, Petersen T (2005) Growth and profit-oriented entrepreneurship among family business owners in the tourism and hospitality industry. Int J Hosp Manag 24(2):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gkartzios M, Scott M (2014) Placing housing in rural development: exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis 54(3):241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande J, Madsen E, Borch O (2011) The relationship between resources, entrepreneurial orientation and performance in farm-based ventures. Entrep Reg Dev 23(3–4):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes S (2003) The digital economy challenge facing peripheral rural area. Prog Hum Geogr 27(2):174–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeble D, Tyler P (1995) Enterprising behaviour and the urban-rural shift. Urban Stud 32(6):975–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElwee G, Smith R, Somerville P (2018) Conceptualising animation in rural communities: the Village SOS case. Entrep Reg Dev 30(1–2):173–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison A (2006) A contextualisation of entrepreneurship. Int J Entrep Behav Res 12(4):192–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumeier S (2012) Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?—proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1):48–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Edinburgh policy statement on enhancing rural innovation. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Edinburgh-Policy-Statement-On-Enhancing-Rural-Innovation.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2018

  • Ray (1997) Culture economies. Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray C (2006) Neo-endogenous development in the EU. In: Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P (eds) The handbook of rural studies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Secco L, Pisani E, Burlando C, Da Re R, Pettenella D, Nijnik M, Miller D, Slee B, Gezik V, Kluvankov T (2016) Social innovation in marginalised rural areas. Report D4.1 guidelines to identify and analyse existing methods to assess social innovation and impacts. http://www.simra-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/D4.1-to-Identify-and-Analyse-Existing-Methods-to-Assess-Social-Innovation-and-Impacts.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2018

  • Slee R (2005) From countrysides of production to countrysides of consumption? J Agric Sci 14:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner A, Farmer J, Bosworth G (2019) Rural social enterprise—evidence to date, and a research agenda. J Rural Stud

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Bosworth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bosworth, G., Price, L., Hakulinen, V., Marango, S. (2020). Rural Social Innovation and Neo-endogenous Rural Development. In: Cejudo, E., Navarro, F. (eds) Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics