Skip to main content

Multi-cloud Services Configuration Based on Risk Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences (OTM 2019)

Abstract

Nowadays risk analysis becomes critical in the Cloud Computing domain due to the increasing number of threats affecting applications running on cloud infrastructures. Multi-cloud environments allow connecting and migrating services from multiple cloud providers to manage risks. This paper addresses the question of how to model and configure multi-cloud services that can adapt to changes in user preferences and threats on individual and composite services. We propose an approach that combines Product Line (PL) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to model and timely find optimal configurations of large adaptive systems such as multi-cloud services. A three-layer variability modeling on domain, user preferences, and adaptation constraints is proposed to configure multi-cloud solutions. ML regression algorithms are used to quantify the risk of resulting configurations by analyzing how a service was affected by incremental threats over time. An experimental evaluation on a real life electronic identification and trust multi-cloud service shows the applicability of the proposed approach to predict the risk for alternative re-configurations on autonomous and decentralized services that continuously change their availability and provision attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The complete PL specification is available at: https://github.com/governit/MultiCloud/tree/master/MultiCloudPL/models.

  2. 2.

    Datasets are available at: https://github.com/governit/MultiCloud/tree/master/RiskQuantification.

  3. 3.

    http://newrelic.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://status.aws.amazon.com/.

  5. 5.

    https://status.cloud.google.com/.

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Abraham, A.: Modeling cloud computing risk assessment using machine learning. In: Abraham, A., Krömer, P., Snasel, V. (eds.) Afro-European Conference for Industrial Advancement. AISC, vol. 334, pp. 315–325. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13572-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Assis, M.R.M., Bittencourt, L.F., Tolosana-Calasanz, R.: Cloud federation: characterisation and conceptual model. In: 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 585–590. IEEE (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2014.90

  3. Böckle, G.: Introduction to software product line engineering. In: Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F. (eds.) Software Product Line Engineering, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28901-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: SMICloud: a framework for comparing and ranking cloud services. In: 4th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 210–218. IEEE (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2011.36

  5. Grozev, N., Buyya, R.: Inter-cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey. Softw. Pract. Exp. 44(3), 369–390 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, Y., Huang, J., Chen, J., Liu, M., Xie, K., Yat-sen, S.: Software project risk management modeling with neural network and support vector machine approaches. In: Third International Conference on Natural Computation, vol. 3, pp. 358–362. IEEE (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNC.2007.672

  7. Khorshed, M.T., Ali, A.S., Wasimi, S.A.: A survey on gaps, threat remediation challenges and some thoughts for proactive attack detection in cloud computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(6), 833–851 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leite, A.F., Alves, V., Rodrigues, G.N., Tadonki, C., Eisenbeis, C., de Melo, A.C.M.A.: Automating resource selection and configuration in inter-clouds through a software product line method. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing, CC 2015, pp. 726–733. IEEE, Washington (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2015.101

  9. Ma, H., Hu, Z., Li, K., Zhang, H.: Toward trustworthy cloud service selection: a time-aware approach using interval neutrosophic set. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 96, 75–94 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2016.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martens, B., Teuteberg, F.: Decision-making in cloud computing environments: a cost and risk based approach. Inf. Syst. Front. 14(4), 871–893 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9317-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ochoa, L., González-Rojas, O.: Program synthesis for configuring collaborative solutions in feature models. In: Ciuciu, I., et al. (eds.) OTM 2016. LNCS, vol. 10034, pp. 98–108. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55961-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ochoa, L., González-Rojas, O., Thüm, T.: Using decision rules for solving conflicts in extended feature models. In: International Conference on Software Language Engineering, pp. 149–160. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2814251.2814263

  13. Ochoa, L., González-Rojas, O., Verano, M., Castro, H.: Searching for optimal configurations within large-scale models: a cloud computing domain. In: Link, S., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9975, pp. 65–75. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Saripalli, P., Walters, B.: QUIRC: a quantitative impact and risk assessment framework for cloud security. In: 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, pp. 280–288. IEEE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2010.22

  15. Stolen, K., et al.: Model-based risk assessment - the coras approach. In: iTrust Workshop (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar González-Rojas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

González-Rojas, O., Tafurth, J. (2019). Multi-cloud Services Configuration Based on Risk Optimization. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences. OTM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33245-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33246-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics