Skip to main content

S-RDF: A New RDF Serialization Format for Better Storage Without Losing Human Readability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences (OTM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11877))

Abstract

Nowadays, RDF data becomes more and more popular on the Web due to the advances of the Semantic Web and the Linked Open Data initiatives. Several works are focused on transforming relational databases to RDF by storing related data in N-Triple serialization format. However, these approaches do not take into account the existing normalization of their databases since N-Triple format allows data redundancy and does not control any normalization by itself. Moreover, the mostly used and recommended serialization formats, such as RDF/XML, Turtle, and HDT, have either high human-readability but waste storage capacity, or focus further on storage capacities while providing low human-readability. To overcome these limitations, we propose here a new serialization format, called S-RDF. By considering the structure (graph) and values of the RDF data separately, S-RDF reduces the duplicity of values by using unique identifiers. Results show an important improvement over the existing serialization formats in terms of storage (up to 71,66% w.r.t. N-Triples) and human readability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Document Type Definition (DTD) defines the structure and the legal elements and attributes of an XML document.

  2. 2.

    Centrality identifies the most related nodes within a graph, which have a high number of relations.

  3. 3.

    It is one of the four normalization forms, which consists on a Canonical Decomposition, followed by a Canonical Composition -http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/.

  4. 4.

    S-RDF: http://rdf-sequence.sigappfr.org.

  5. 5.

    Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. It provides a extensive Java libraries for helping developers develop code that handles RDF, RDFS, RDFa, OWL and SPARQL in line with published W3C recommendations - https://jena.apache.org/about_jena/about.html.

  6. 6.

    Information about persons extracted from the English and Germany Wikipedia, represented by the FOAF vocabulary - http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads2015-10.

  7. 7.

    Geographic coordinates extracted from Wikipedia - https://wiki.dbpedia.org/downloads-2016-10.

  8. 8.

    Easy-Converte: http://www.easyrdf.org/converter.

  9. 9.

    RDF-Translator: https://rdf-translator.appspot.com.

  10. 10.

    The form is available here: https://forms.gle/DNMfsp5LL3nw1hW9A.

References

  1. Microdata to RDF - Second Edition - Transformation from HTML+Microdata to RDF. https://www.w3.org/TR/microdata-rdf/ (2014). Accessed 01 July 2019

  2. Phillips, M.D.A.: Tags for identifying languages. https://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47. Accessed 01 July 2019

  3. Bornea, M.A., et al.: Building an efficient RDF store over a relational database. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 2013, pp. 121–132. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Būmans, G., Čerāns, K.: RDB2OWL: A practical approach for transforming RDB data into RDF/OWL. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS 2010, pp. 25:1–25:3. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chantrapornchai, C., Makpaisit, P.: TripleiD-C: low cost compressed representation for RDF query processing in GPUs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region, HPC Asia 2018, pp. 261–270. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyganiak, R., Wood, D., Lanthaler, M.: RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax. Technical report (2014). Accessed 06 Dec 2016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duerst, M., Suignard, M.: Internationalized resource identifiers (IRIs). Technical report, Microsoft Corporation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fernández, J.D.: Binary RDF for scalable publishing, exchanging and consumption in the web of data. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2012 Companion, pp. 133–138. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goasdoué, F., Manolescu, I., Roatiş, A.: Getting more RDF support from relational databases. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2012 Companion, pp. 515–516. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hausenblas, M., Ding, L., Peristeras, V.: Linked open government data. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27, 11–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández-Illera, A., Martínez-Prieto, M.A., Fernández, J.D.: Serializing RDF in compressed space. In: 2015 Data Compression Conference, pp. 363–372, April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, J.-Y., Lange, C., Auer, S.: Streaming transformation of XML to RDF using XPath-based mappings. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems, SEMANTICS 2015, pp. 129–136. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Konstantinou, N., Kouis, D., Mitrou, N.: Incremental export of relational database contents into RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14), WIMS 2014, pp. 33:1–33:8. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lacoste, D., Sawant, K.P., Roy, S.: An efficient XML to OWL converter. In: Proceedings of the 4th India Software Engineering Conference, ISEC 2011, pp. 145–154. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lassila, O., Swick, R.R., Wide, W., Consortium, W.: Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., Lindström, N., Sporny, M., Longley, D.: JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data, W3C Recommendation 16 January 2014 (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/. Accessed 27 Oct 2017

  17. O’Connor, M.J., Das, A.: Acquiring OWL ontologies from XML documents. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2011, pp. 17–24. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P.J.: RDF 1.1 Semantics, W3C Recommendation 25 February 2014 (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/#literals-and-datatypes. Accessed 01 July 2019

  19. Salas, P.E., Marx, E., Mera, A., Viterbo, J.: RDB2RDF plugin: relational databases to RDF plugin for eclipse. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Developing Tools As Plug-ins, TOPI 2011, pp. 28–31. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sandro Hawke, P.A., Herman, I.: W3C semantic web activity (2001). https://www.w3c.org/2001/sw/. Accessed 06 Dec 2018

  21. Sequeda, J.F., Arenas, M., Miranker, D.P.: On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2012, pp. 649–658. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stefanova, S., Risch, T.: Scalable reconstruction of RDF-archived relational databases. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Semantic Web Information Management, SWIM 2013, pp. 5:1–5:4. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thuy, P.T.T., Lee, Y.-K., Lee, S.: DTD2OWL: automatic transforming XML documents into OWL ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, ICIS 2009, pp. 125–131. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thuy, P.T.T., Thuan, N.D., Han, Y., Park, K., Lee, Y.-K.: RDB2RDF: completed transformation from relational database into RDF ontology. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, ICUIMC 2014, pp. 88:1–88:7. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ticona-Herrera, R., Tekli, J., Chbeir, R., Laborie, S., Dongo, I., Guzman, R.: Toward RDF normalization. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 261–275. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Vion-Dury, J.-Y.: Using RDFS/OWL to ease semantic integration of structured documents. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, DocEng 2013, pp. 189–192. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irvin Dongo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dongo, I., Chbeir, R. (2019). S-RDF: A New RDF Serialization Format for Better Storage Without Losing Human Readability. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Hepp, M., Lewis, D., Ardagna, C., Meersman, R. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2019 Conferences. OTM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33246-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33245-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33246-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics