Abstract
This paper investigates how different configuration of epistemic network analysis parameters influence the examination of student interactions in asynchronous discussions in online learning environments. Specifically, the paper investigates strategies for dealing by unintended consequences of a dominant node in epistemic network analysis (ENA). In particular, the paper reports on a study that explored the effects of two different strategies including (i) the use of different dimensions calculated with singular value decomposition (SVD), and (ii) exclusion of a dominant code. Our results showed that the use of different SVDs did not change the influence of a dominant code in the graph. On the other hand, the exclusion of the dominant code led to an entirely different configuration in ENA. The practical implications of the results are further discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, T., Dron, J.: Three generations of distance education pedagogy. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 12(3), 80–97 (2011)
Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D.W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A., Chesler, N.C.: Teaching and assessing engineering design thinking with virtual internships and epistemic network analysis. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32(2), 1492–1501 (2016)
Cai, Z., Eagan, B., Dowell, N., Pennebaker, J., Shaffer, D., Graesser, A.: Epistemic network analysis and topic modeling for chat data from collaborative learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2017)
Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Rolim, V.: Towards combined network and text analytics of student discourse in online discussions. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 111–126. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_9
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 15(1), 7–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V.: Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Internet High. Educ. 24, 53–65 (2015)
Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: SENS: network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 562–577 (2019)
Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., Joksimović, S.: Effects of instructional conditions and experience on the adoption of a learning tool. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67, 207–220 (2017)
Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Hatala, M.: What is the source of social capital? the association between social network position and social presence in communities of inquiry (2014)
Nash, P., Shaffer, D.W.: Mentor modeling: the internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 27(2), 173–189 (2011)
Neto, V., et al.: Automated analysis of cognitive presence in online discussions written in Portuguese. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2018. LNCS, vol. 11082, pp. 245–261. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_19
Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D.: Analysing social presence in online discussions through network and text analytics. In: 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), vol. 2161, pp. 163–167. IEEE (2019)
Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R.D., Gǎsević, D.: A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. Internet High. Educ. 42, 53–65 (2019)
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W.: Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing (1999)
Ruis, A., Siebert-Evenstone, A., Pozen, R., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: A method for determining the extent of recent temporal context in analyses of complex, collaborative thinking. In: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS] (2018)
Ruxton, G.D.: The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to student’s t-test and the mann–whitney u test. Behav. Ecol. 17(4), 688–690 (2006)
Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ. 46(3), 223–234 (2006)
Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)
Shaffer, D.W., et al.: Epistemic network analysis: a prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. Int. J. Learn. Media 1(2), 1–21 (2009)
Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017)
Siemens, G., Gašević, D., Dawson, S.: Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning (2015)
Swiecki, Z., Ruis, R., Shaffer, D.: Does order matter? investigating sequential and cotemporal models of collaboration. In: 13th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ferreira Mello, R., Gašević, D. (2019). What is the Effect of a Dominant Code in an Epistemic Network Analysis?. In: Eagan, B., Misfeldt, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33231-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33232-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)