Skip to main content

What is the Effect of a Dominant Code in an Epistemic Network Analysis?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1112))

Abstract

This paper investigates how different configuration of epistemic network analysis parameters influence the examination of student interactions in asynchronous discussions in online learning environments. Specifically, the paper investigates strategies for dealing by unintended consequences of a dominant node in epistemic network analysis (ENA). In particular, the paper reports on a study that explored the effects of two different strategies including (i) the use of different dimensions calculated with singular value decomposition (SVD), and (ii) exclusion of a dominant code. Our results showed that the use of different SVDs did not change the influence of a dominant code in the graph. On the other hand, the exclusion of the dominant code led to an entirely different configuration in ENA. The practical implications of the results are further discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, T., Dron, J.: Three generations of distance education pedagogy. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 12(3), 80–97 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arastoopour, G., Shaffer, D.W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A., Chesler, N.C.: Teaching and assessing engineering design thinking with virtual internships and epistemic network analysis. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 32(2), 1492–1501 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, Z., Eagan, B., Dowell, N., Pennebaker, J., Shaffer, D., Graesser, A.: Epistemic network analysis and topic modeling for chat data from collaborative learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Rolim, V.: Towards combined network and text analytics of student discourse in online discussions. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 111–126. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 15(1), 7–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V.: Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Internet High. Educ. 24, 53–65 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: SENS: network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 92, 562–577 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., Dawson, S., Joksimović, S.: Effects of instructional conditions and experience on the adoption of a learning tool. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67, 207–220 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Hatala, M.: What is the source of social capital? the association between social network position and social presence in communities of inquiry (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nash, P., Shaffer, D.W.: Mentor modeling: the internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 27(2), 173–189 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neto, V., et al.: Automated analysis of cognitive presence in online discussions written in Portuguese. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2018. LNCS, vol. 11082, pp. 245–261. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D.: Analysing social presence in online discussions through network and text analytics. In: 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), vol. 2161, pp. 163–167. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R.D., Gǎsević, D.: A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. Internet High. Educ. 42, 53–65 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W.: Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruis, A., Siebert-Evenstone, A., Pozen, R., Eagan, B.R., Shaffer, D.W.: A method for determining the extent of recent temporal context in analyses of complex, collaborative thinking. In: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. [ISLS] (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ruxton, G.D.: The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to student’s t-test and the mann–whitney u test. Behav. Ecol. 17(4), 688–690 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaffer, D.W.: Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Comput. Educ. 46(3), 223–234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaffer, D.W., et al.: Epistemic network analysis: a prototype for 21st-century assessment of learning. Int. J. Learn. Media 1(2), 1–21 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siebert-Evenstone, A.L., Irgens, G.A., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Shaffer, D.W.: In search of conversational grain size: modeling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siemens, G., Gašević, D., Dawson, S.: Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Swiecki, Z., Ruis, R., Shaffer, D.: Does order matter? investigating sequential and cotemporal models of collaboration. In: 13th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Ferreira Mello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferreira Mello, R., Gašević, D. (2019). What is the Effect of a Dominant Code in an Epistemic Network Analysis?. In: Eagan, B., Misfeldt, M., Siebert-Evenstone, A. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33231-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33232-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics