Skip to main content

Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Examining environmental participation in decision making this chapter begins with a clarification of the term environmental decision making in relation to management and governance. Then I outline a conceptual framework based on the commonly used notions of instrumental, normative or substantive rationales for involving publics. The main part of the chapter is dedicated to two practical examples. One is the West Cumbria MRWS Partnership that spent three years examining technoscience knowledge and establishing the local community’s view on the possibility of siting a geological disposal facility (GDF) for radioactive waste in the area. The second example is the Catchment Based Approach (CaBA), a policy involving local communities in river management. In the final section the examples are considered in relation to the notion of technologies of elicitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 2011–2014 InSOTEC (International Socio-Technical Challenges for implementing geological disposal) collaborative social sciences research project, funded under the European Atomic Energy Community’s 7th Framework Programme was led by Dr. Anne Bergmans, University of Antwerp.

  2. 2.

    For in-depth analysis of this issue see, for example, Bergmans et al. (2015), Blowers (2017), and Chilvers (2007).

  3. 3.

    Detailed information about the partnership is archived at http://www.westcumbriamrws.org.uk, the work is summarised in the final report: West Cumbria MRWS Partnership. 2012. The final report of the West Cumbria Managing Radioactive Waste Safely Partnership. Copeland Borough Council and 3KQ Ltd. ISBN 978-0-9573709-0-6.

  4. 4.

    https://catchmentbasedapproach.org/quote, July 30, 2019.

References

  • Bergmans, Anne, Göran Sundqvist, Dragos Kos, and Peter Simmons. 2015. The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: Deliberation and the socialtechnical divide. Journal of Risk Research 18: 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowers, Andrew. 2017. The legacy of nuclear power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, Harriet, and Arthur P.J. Mol. 2003. Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values 2: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, Jason. 2007. Democratizing science in the UK: The case of radioactive waste management. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, ed. I. Scoones and B. Wynne, 237–243. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2016. Science, democracy and emergent publics. In Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics, ed. J. Chilvers and M. Kearnes, 1–27. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra. 2013. Catchment Based Approach: Improving the quality of our water environment. A policy framework to encourage the wider adoption of an integrated Catchment Based Approach to improving the quality of our water environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, Andrew. 2001. The making of green knowledge: Environmental politics and cultural transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landström, Catharina, and Stewart Kemp. 2019. The power of place: How local engagement with geological disposal of radioactive waste re-situated technoscience and re-assembled the public. Science and Technology Studies, online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, Javier, and Linda Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16: 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andy. 2007. Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement, ed. M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne, 218–231. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • West Cumbria MRWS Partnership. 2010. Public and stakeholder engagement round 1 report. Adopted 13th May (Doc. 61 in the electronic archive at http://www.westcumbriamrws.org.uk).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catharina Landström .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Landström, C. (2020). Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making. In: Environmental Participation. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33042-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33043-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics