Abstract
This chapter focuses on the participation of publics in environmental science. The STS classification—co-production, dialogue and education—of different ways in which science and lay people relate, is introduced as an analytical framework. This framework organises the discussion of environmental participation practices in three clusters: co-production projects, stakeholder deliberation and citizen science. Examples of each cluster are presented, demonstrating the diversity of environmental participation in scientific research. Finally, I reflect on how the diverse practices could challenge the framing typology and raise some issues that seem to be left out of most discussions of environmental participation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Understanding Environmental Knowledge Controversies: The case of flood risk management 2007–2010, funded by the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme, PI professor Sarah J. Whatmore, Co-Is professor Stuart Lane and professor Neil Ward.
- 2.
- 3.
The UK Forestry Commission provides an account of the demonstration project at https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/research/slowing-the-flow-at-pickering/.
- 4.
This model is presented in Odoni and Lane (2010).
- 5.
Producing a multitude of accounts of the work in Pickering and the method trialled we realised that it was important to signal that we did not know whether the approach would be useful for participation in research on other than environmental issues, hence we added the qualifier environmental to competency groups.
- 6.
Professor Jim Hall was PI for the MaRIUS (Managing the risks, impacts and uncertainties of drought and water scarcity) and it involved Co-Is at University of Oxford, University of Bristol and Cranfield University.
- 7.
Kennet ECG (2017).
- 8.
The lack of diversity among the actors does, however, contribute to a lack of innovation in UK drought management according to Grecksch (2018).
- 9.
For an account of this project see the final report Kallenbach-Herbert et al. (2014).
- 10.
References
Allen, Myles. 1999. Do-it-yourself climate prediction. Commentary. Nature 401: 642.
Callon, Michel. 1999. The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science Technology & Society 4 (1): 81–94.
Grecksch, Kevin. 2018. Scenarios for resilient drought and water scarcity management in England and Wales. International Journal of River Basin Management 17: 219–227.
Kallenbach-Herbert, Beate, Bettina Brohmann, Peter Simmons, Anne Bergmans, Yannick Barthe, and Meritxell Martel. 2014. Addressing the long-term management of high-level and long-lived nuclear wastes as a socio-technical problem: Insights from InSOTEC. University of Antwerp. ISBN: 9789057284779.
Konopasek, Zedneck, Linda Soneryd, and Karel Svacina. 2018. Lost in translation: Czech dialogues by Swedish design. Science and Technology Studies 31 (3): 5–23.
Landström, Catharina, and Anne Bergmans. 2014. Long-term repository governance: A socio-technical challenge. Journal of Risk Research 18 (3): 378–391.
Landström, Catharina, Sarah J. Whatmore, Stuart N. Lane, Nicholas A. Odoni, Neil Ward, and Susan Bradley. 2011. Co-producing flood risk knowledge: Redistributing expertise in ‘participatory modelling’. Environment and Planning A 43 (7): 1617–1633.
Lane, Stuart N., Nicholas A. Odoni, Catharina Landström, Sarah J. Whatmore, Neil Ward, and Susan Bradley. 2011. Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (1): 15–36.
Odoni, Nicholas, and Stuart Lane. 2010. Knowledge-theoretic models in hydrology. Progress in Physical Geography 34 (2): 151–171.
Quet, Mathieu. 2014. Science to the people! (and experimental politics): Searching for the roots of participatory discourse in science and technology in the 1970s in France. Public Understanding of Science 23 (6): 628–645.
Stainforth, D. A., T. Aina, C. Christensen, M. Collins, N. Fauli, D. J. Frame, J. A. Kettlebourough, S. Knight, A. Martin, J. M. Murphy, C. Piani, D. Sexton, L. A. Smith, R. A. Spicer, A. J. Thorpe, and M. R. Allen. 2005. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433: 403–406.
The River Kennet ECG. 2017. Active Water Resilience: Incorporating local knowledge in water management of the River Kennet catchment. Report of the 2015–16 River Kennet Environmental Competency Group. Published by ECI, ISBN: 978-1-874370-66-6.
Whatmore, Sarah J., and Catharina Landström. 2011. Flood-apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Economy & Society 40 (4): 582–610.
Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—Hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9: 211–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landström, C. (2020). Public Participation in Environmental Science. In: Environmental Participation. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33043-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33042-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33043-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)