Abstract
In this chapter, we present the purpose of this book: contributing to a refoundation of spatial planning theories and practices on ecological basis, or framing planning into the paradigm of ecological rationality. We purposely use the term refoundation because deeply ecological thinking has been present in the planning tradition since its inception—thanks to the contribution of prominent scholars and polymath thinkers—but has largely been lost or disregarded in what developed as mainstream theory and practice. We, therefore, start by reviving the contributions of scholars such as Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford, Ian McHarg and others, who developed the ecological foundation of planning and elaborate in particular on Mumford’s engagement with historical materialism and other Marxian concepts. We will also discuss the need to advance ecological planning theorization in light of the more recent development of the ecological crisis and the new tools and knowledge we have at disposal. The chapter concludes by presenting an outline of the book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agroecology Europe (2019) Our understanding of agroecology. http://agroecology-europe.org/our-approach/our-understanding-of-agroecology/
Altieri MA (2018) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. CRC Press
Batty M, Marshall S (2009) The evolution of cities: Geddes, Abercrombie and the new physicalism. Town Plan Rev 80(6):551–574. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.12
Bedoya-Perales N, Pumi G, Mujica A, Talamini E, Domingos Padula A (2018) Quinoa expansion in Peru and its implications for land use management. Sustainability 10(2):532
Chisholm A (1972) Philosophers of the earth: conversations with ecologists. Sidgwick and Jackson, London
Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) Resolution No. 2 on the European regional/spatial planning charter (Torremolinos Charter). 6th European conference of ministers responsible for regional planning (CEMAT) (Torremolinos, Spain: 19–20 May 1983) on “Prospects of development and of spatial planning in maritime regions”
Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Van Den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Crowe PR, Foley K (2017) Exploring urban resilience in practice: a century of vacant sites mapping in Dublin, Edinburgh and Philadelphia. J Urban Des 22 (2):208–228
Dramstad W, Olson JD, Forman RT (1996) Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Island Press, Wasgington, DC
Eisenman TS, Murray T (2017) An integral lens on Patrick Geddes. Landsc Urban Plan 166:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.011
Engels F (1887) The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. Leipzig: 1845. Trans. London: 1887
Engels F (1890) Letter to J Bloch. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1890/letters/90_09_21.htm
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574
Fjord Levy S (2011) Grounding landscape urbanism. Scenario 01: Landscape Urbanism. https://scenariojournal.com/article/grounding-landscape-urbanism/
Geddes P, Thompson JA (1889) The Evolution of Sex. London: Walter Scott
Glikson A (1971) The ecological basis of planning. Springer, Dordrecht
Green A (2006) Matter and psyche: Lewis Mumford’s appropriation of Marx and Jung in his appraisal of the condition of man in technological civilization. History Human Sci 19(3):33–64
Greenreport.it (2019) L’urbanistica come mezzo per una transizione ecologica e solidale in Italia. Interview to Silvia Viviani by Luca Aterini. http://www.greenreport.it/news/economia-ecologica/lurbanistica-come-mezzo-per-una-transizione-ecologica-e-solidale-in-italia/
Goist PD (1974) Patrick Geddes and the city. J Am Plan Assoc 40(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367408977444
Guha R (1991) Lewis Mumford: the forgotten American environmentalist: an essay in rehabilitation. Capitalism Nat Social 2(3):67–91
Hall, PG (1998, 2002). Cities of tomorrow, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Hysler-Rubin N (2009) The changing appreciation of Patrick Geddes: a case study in planning history. Plan Perspect 24(3):349–366
Hysler-Rubin N (2013) The celebration, condemnation and reinterpretation of the Geddes plan, 1925: the dynamic planning history of Tel Aviv. Urban Hist 40(1):114–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926812000661
IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://www.ipbes.net/news/ipbes-global-assessment-summary-policymakers-pdf
Khan N (2011) Geddes in India: town planning, plant sentience, and cooperative evolution. Environ Plan D: Soc Space 29(5):840–856. https://doi.org/10.1068/d5610
Kropotkin P (1899) Fields, factories, and workshops: or industry combined with agriculture, and brainwork with manual work, 1st edn. Boston: 1899. Revised Ed. London: 1919
Law A (2005) The ghost of Patrick Geddes: civics as applied sociology. Sociol Res Online 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1092
Lyle JT (1996) Regenerative design for sustainable development. Wiley
Martínez-Alier J (1987) Ecological economics: energy, economics, society. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Martínez-Alier J, Muradian R (2015) (eds) Handbook of ecological economics. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471416
Marx K (1990, original ed. 1867) Capital: Vol. 1 Penguin, London
McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. New York: American Museum of Natural History
Metternicht G (2018) Land use and spatial planning—enabling sustainable management of land resources. Springer briefs in earth sciences. Springer Nature, Switzerland, 116 p
Mumford L (1934) Technics and civilization. Harcourt Brace, New York
Mumford L (1938) The culture of cities. Harcourt, Brace and company
Mumford L (1961) The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects (Vol. 67). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Mumford L (1965) Technics and the nature of man. Nature 208(5014):923–928
Mumford L (1970). The Myth of the Machine II - The Pentagon of Power, New York, NY, Harcourt Brace
Moore JW (2016) The rise of cheap nature. In: Moore JW (ed) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? PM Press, Oakland, pp 78–115
O'Gorman TE, Hill IE (2013) Burke, Mumford, and the Poetics of Technology: Marxism’s Influence on Burke’s Critique of Techno-logology. In Burke in the Archives: Using the Past to Transform the Future of Burkean Studies. University of South Carolina Press
Reynolds S (2004) ‘Patrick Geddes’s French connections in academic and political life: networking from 1878 to the 1900s’. In: Fowle F, Thomson B (eds) Patrick Geddes: the French connection. White Cockade Publishing and The Scottish Society for Art History, Oxford
Shoshkes E (2017) Jaqueline Tyrwhitt translates Patrick Geddes for post world war two planning. Landsc Urban Plan 166:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.011
Smith N (1984) Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space. The University of Georgia Press, Athens
Welter VM (2017) Commentary on “thinking organic, acting civic: the paradox of planning for cities in evolution” by Michael Batty and Stephen Marshall, and “Jaqueline Tyrwhitt translates Patrick Geddes for post world war two planning” by Ellen Shoshkes. Landsc Urban Plan 166:25–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.020
Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C (2009) Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 29(4):503–515
Woudstra J (2018) Designing the garden of Geddes: the master gardener and the profession of landscape architecture. Landsc Urban Plan 178:198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.023
Young RF (2017) “Free cities and regions”—Patrick Geddes’s theory of planning. Landsc Urban Plan 166:27–36
Young RF, Clavel P (2017) Planning living cities: Patrick Geddes’ legacy in the new millennium. Landsc Urban Plan 166:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rega, C. (2020). Standing on the Shoulders of Giants—Reviving Ecological Approaches in Planning Traditions. In: Ecological Rationality in Spatial Planning. Cities and Nature. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33027-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33027-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33026-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33027-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)