Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

Findings of the study on the dual nature of legitimacy in the post-socialist prison environment revealed that prison staff–prisoners relations present the linking factor between both types of internal legitimacy. To achieve the normative compliance of prisoners, prison workers must establish good and sincere relations with them. Two forms of compliance were identified as being important—instrumental and normative compliance. Findings also suggest that Tyler’s model of studying legitimacy is not entirely suitable for the Slovenian prison environment. Prison workers, from good relations with prisoners, receive much-needed confirmation of their work that reassures their role in the prison setting. In general, prison workers perceive their legitimacy positively, and are generally rather confident in performing their duties in the context of implementing authority. Moreover, positive perception of self-legitimacy influences their work performance and their willingness to establish and maintain the legitimacy relationship to prisoners through good maintaining good relations. However, the relative vagueness of their mission and the quite high recidivism among prisoners (approximately 50%) cause noteworthy frustration and confusion to prison workers that in some cases may lead to a professional identity crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The main obstacles for achieving good [informal] relations between prison workers and prisoners are seen in: (1) the hostility and distrust of prisoners toward prison workers; and (2) the disinterest of prison staff to enter into informal relations with prisoners. Tait (2011) argued that not all prison workers are interested in helping prisoners.

  2. 2.

    Due to the high level of instrumental compliance, a question arises how genuine is prisoners’ trust in the prison staff. Smith (2010) drew attention to strategic trust, where individuals have eligible motives and intentions of acting in our favor in various situations.

  3. 3.

    Rus (2011) argued that prisoners are subjected to both social learning (rules among prisoners) and social influencing (internalization of the norms of the prison subculture).

  4. 4.

    Most of the older prisoners were recidivists who have expressed hostility towards the whole criminal justice system.

  5. 5.

    A majority of prisoners in open and semi-open regimes progressed from closed departments based on their good conduct. This sort of progression excludes the possibility of an individual’s instrumental compliance, as it is unstable over a longer term.

  6. 6.

    Prison workers who perceive supervisors as: (1) individuals who make fair and equitable decisions; (2) offer a model of behavior that they wish to follow; and (3) provide support in time of crises, cultivate positive emotions toward them receive a positive impact on their self-esteem, gain confidence in their abilities, and heighten their self-legitimacy.

  7. 7.

    Weinrath (2016) exposed social distance between prison workers and prisoners as a constant in prison, which is presented as: (1) the reluctance of prison workers for establishing “too” friendly relations with prisoners; and (2) maintaining “appropriate” boundaries with prisoners.

  8. 8.

    In recent years, austerity measures were introduced in the Slovenian public sector, the effects of which were also felt by prison workers (prohibition of employment of additional staff, freezing of promotions, reduced wages, activities of trade unions, etc.).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rok Hacin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hacin, R., Meško, G. (2020). Discussion and Conclusion. In: The Dual Nature of Legitimacy in the Prison Environment. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32842-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32843-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics