Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

The Slovenian prison administration was established in 1995 to manage six prisons, which are separate facilities operating in 14 different locations, and one correctional home. Differentiation of imprisoned persons is in force based on gender, age, nature of the sentence, duration of the sentence, and degree of security. Despite the prioritization of a security component, a strong rehabilitation model is still present in the operation of the individual prisons. The Slovenian prison system has been challenged with an increasing prison population in recent years, which has caused overcrowding in several of the prisons. The prison population increased by more than 40% over the period 2005–2016. The structure of the prison population shows that prisoners sentenced for property crime present almost half of the prison population in Slovenia, followed by those who were sentenced for crimes against life and limb, and crimes against human health (mostly drug-related offenses). The number of prison workers increased by approximately 6% in the period 2005–2016. Prison officers present the largest group of prison workers in Slovenia (approximately 60%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2014, the Constitutional court of the Republic of Slovenia ruled that prison sentences for committed misdemeanors must be abolished (Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije 2014).

  2. 2.

    Prison population reflects the changes of the Slovenian penal policy. In general, the number of criminal offenses detected by the police remained relatively stable from 2005 to 2016 (approximately 90,000 recorded criminal offences per year). In the same period, the number of conditional convictions decreased from 5,629 in 2005 to 4,903 in 2016, while the numbers of prison sentences increased from 1,299 in 2005 to 1,396 in 2016 and fines from 37 in 2005 to 309 in 2016 (Plesničar and Drobnjak 2019).

References

  • Aebi, M. F., Burkhardt, C., Hacin, R., & Tiago, M. M. (2016). A comparative perspective of imprisonment trends in Slovenia and Europe from 2005 to 2014. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 67(4), 430–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meško, G., Fields, C., & Smole, T. (2011). A concise overview of penology and penal practice in Slovenia: The unchanged capacity, new standards, and prison overcrowding. The Prison Journal, 9(4), 398–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plesničar, M. M., & Drobnjak, M. (2019). Kaznovanje in kaznovalna politika v Sloveniji: koncpetualni premiki in praktične posledice. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 70(2), 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2006). Letno poročilo 2005. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2007). Letno poročilo 2006. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2008). Letno poročilo 2007. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2009). Letno poročilo 2008. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2010). Letno poročilo 2009. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2011). Letno poročilo 2010. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2012). Letno poročilo 2011. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2013). Letno poročilo 2012. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2014). Letno poročilo 2013. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2015). Letno poročilo 2014. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2016). Letno poročilo 2015. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2017). Letno poročilo 2016. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij [URSIKS]. (2018). Letno poročilo 2017. Ljubljana: Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije. (2014). Odločba št. U–I–12/12–22 of 11. 12. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rok Hacin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hacin, R., Meško, G. (2020). The Slovenian Prison System. In: The Dual Nature of Legitimacy in the Prison Environment. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32843-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32842-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32843-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics