Abstract
Jordan Osserman offers a case study of an event in India that ruptures assumptions about queerness and heteronormativity. In February 2011, the Telugu Indian news station TV9 aired a sensationalistic expose entitled ‘Gay Culture Rampant in Hyderabad’. In an unexpected turn of events that seemed to catch the network by surprise, the segment generated widespread opposition and outrage, culminating in an injunction from the News Broadcasters’ Standards Authority (NBSA) requiring TV9 to issue an on-air apology and pay a 1 lakh fine. The event became a flashpoint in the fast-moving history of queer India. Osserman examines the fantasmatic universe of queer criminality that TV9 constructed, in order to better understand how the production and dissemination of homophobic fantasy within a local context relates to larger geopolitical forces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The broadcast, initially available on YouTube, was reported to Google as abuse by numerous activists and eventually taken down. An amateur English translation of the segment was circulated online by Ram Abireddy. This article is based on research and fieldwork conducted while I was a Fulbright-Nehru scholar in India; I worked with a Hyderabadi speaker to amend the translation of the broadcast where necessary. I was present in Hyderabad when the broadcast first aired and participated in politically organizing to oppose it.
- 2.
Section 377 was a colonial-era law prohibiting ‘acts against the order of nature’, popularly understood to target LGBT people. The overturning of this law by the Delhi High Court was considered a watershed moment for LGBT activism in India. The law was subsequently reinstated by the Indian Supreme Court in 2016, then revisited by the Supreme Court in 2018 and finally ruled unconstitutional ‘in so far as it criminalises consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex’ (Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018).
- 3.
On the malleability and portability of archetypes, the authors quote Carl Jung: ‘No archetype can be reduced to a simple formula … It persists throughout the ages and requires being interpreted ever anew. The archetypes … change their shape continually’ (Mogul et al. 2011, p. 27).
References
Fridae. (2011). LGBT Community Holds Multi-city Protests Against TV Channel That Outed Gay Men. Available at http://www.fridae.asia/gay-news/2011/02/28/10677.lgbt-community-holds-multi-city-protests-against-tv-channel-that-outed-gay-men.
Ganesh, M. (2011). Pulp Frictions. In A. Narrain & A. Gupta (Eds.), Law Like Love: Queer Perspectives on Law (pp. 430–465). New Delhi: Yoda Press.
Geen, J. (2011). Indian TV Report Outs Gay Men. Pink News. Available at http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2011/02/24/indian-tv-report-outs-gay-men/.
Ghosh, S. (2010). Fire. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
Hook, D. (2018). Racism and Jouissance: Evaluating the ‘Racism as (the Theft Of) Enjoyment’ Hypothesis. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 23(3), 244–266.
Liang, L. (2015). The Erotics of Law, Scandal, and Technology. In R. Ramdev, S. D. Nambiar, & D. Bhattacharya (Eds.), Sentiment, Politics, Censorship: The State of Hurt. New Delhi: Sage.
Mogul, J. L., Ritchie, A. J., & Whitlock, K. (2011). Queer (In)Justice: The Criminalization of LGBT People in the United States. New York: Beacon Press.
Narrain, S. (2012). ‘Exposing’ an Expose. The Alternative. Available at http://www.thealternative.in/society/exposing-expose/. Accessed 13 February 2017.
Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. (Petitioner(s)) Versus Union of India Thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (Respondent(s)), Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 76 of 2016, India: Supreme Court, 6 September 2018. Available at https://www.refworld.org/cases,IND_SC,5b9639944.html. Accessed 31 May 2019.
Outrage Over TV Sting on Gays. (2011). NDTV. Available at http://www.ndtv.com/video/news/news/outrage-over-tv-sting-on-gays-191806. Accessed 13 February 2017.
Padmaja, S. (2008). Political Economy of Telugu TV Industry. Communication, XI, 20–25.
Phadke, S., Khan, S., & Ranade, S. (2011). Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets. Mumbai: Penguin Books India.
Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Queerty. (n.d.). Why Is This Indian TV Network Cruising planetromeo.com and Exposing Its Gay Users? Available at https://www.queerty.com/why-is-this-indian-tv-network-cruising-planetromeo-com-and-exposing-its-gay-users-20110224.
Rao, R. (2010). Third World Protest: Between Home and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rao, R. (2015). Global Homocapitalism. Radical Philosophy, 194, 38–49.
Singh, S. (2011). The Community Unites—India’s Stonewall? In Gaylaxy. Available at http://www.gaylaxymag.com/blogs/the-community-unites-indias-stonewall/#gs.ThNLF3M.
Singh, N., & Rampal, N. (2018, July 21). India’s First and Oldest Gay Rights Activist Is Also on the Extreme Right of RSS. Scroll.in. Available at https://theprint.in/politics/indias-first-and-oldest-gay-activist-uses-a-brand-of-hindutva-to-fight-377/85919/.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2007). The Lacanian Left. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Sudhir, U. (2011). For Gay Men Outed on TV, an Identity Crisis. Available at http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/for-gay-men-outed-on-tv-an-identity-crisis-448517. Accessed 13 February 2017.
The Advocate. (2011). Gay Men Outed in Indian TV Report. Available at http://www.advocate.com/news/daily-news/2011/02/24/gay-men-outed-indian-tv-report. Accessed 13 February 2017.
Verma, J. S. (2009). Justice J.S. Verma Comments on the Naz Foundation Judgment—Law and Other Things. In Law and Other Things. Available at http://lawandotherthings.com/2009/07/justice-jsvermas-comment-on-naz/. Accessed 13 February 2017.
Žižek, S. (1992). Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Osserman, J. (2019). ‘Gay Culture Rampant in Hyderabad’: Analysing the Political and Libidinal Economy of Homophobia. In: Frosh, S. (eds) New Voices in Psychosocial Studies. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32758-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32758-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32757-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32758-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)