Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Social Media and Elections in Africa, Volume 2 pp 135–151Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Post Digital Dialogue and Activism in the Public Sphere

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Dialogue in the public sphere includes the biopower of the individual, his or her agency and legitimacy as an activist. Digital technology and social media platforms provide individuals and groups with opportunities to communicate their personal experiences and to share their opinions and views within various continually evolving digital networks that may or may not consist of structures that can facilitate protest action. Digital dialogue has drastically altered our social and political realities as well as our modes of participation within the virtual public spheres. The purpose of this conceptual chapter is to explore the opportunities dialogue in the virtual public sphere offers political protestors to influence more diverse groups, increase their resistance of normative hierarchies and improve quality of participation from like-minded citizens. The discussion is contextualised within a political protest in the Alexandra Township, South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbar, W. (2018). An architecture of activism: Grassroots organizing in the digital age. Unpublished thesis, Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. https://doi.org/10.13016/M2M03Z169

  • Azionya, C. M. (2015). ‘University of Johannesburg millenials’ communication of brand perception on Facebook: Implications for reputation management’. Unpublished dissertation, University of Johannesburg. Retrieved October 15, 2018, from http://hdl.handle.net/10210/85184

  • Bardhan, N. (2003). Rupturing public relations metanarratives: The example of India. Journal of Public relations Research, 15(3), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, N., & Weaver, C. K. (2011). Culture, communication and third culture building. In Public relations in global cultural contexts. Multi-paradigmatic perspectives (pp. 77–107). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batel, S., & Castro, P. (2009). A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: An analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(4), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benecke, D. R. (2019). The social representation of PR activism in selected early career South African Public Relations Practitioners. Unpublished doctoral thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven: Yale University Press. Retrieved from http://www.benkler.org/wealthofnetworks/index.php?title=7. Political freedom Part 2: Emergence of the networked public sphere.

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. (2016). Digital activism: How social media prevalence has impacted modern activism. MA Dissertation, University of Washington. Retrieved from https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/36431/Chapman_washington_0250O_15963.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Ciszek, E. L. (2015). Bridging the gap: Mapping the relationship between activism and public relations. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constandius, E., Nell, I., Alexander, N., Mckay, M., Blackie, M., Malgas, R., et al. (2018). FeesMustFall and decolonizing the curriculum: Stellenbosch University students’ and lecturers’ reaction. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(2), 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture. Citizenship Studies, 18(6–7), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.865903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, P. A., & Gaither, T. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal for Public Relations Research, 17(2), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, N., & McGarty, C. (2016). Expanding on psychological theories of engagement to understand activism in context(s). Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2003). Reconfiguring civic culture in the new media Milieu. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the Restyling of Politics (pp. 151–170). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M. J. (2014). A culture-centered approach to listening: Voices of social change. The International Journal of Listening, 28, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. (2012). Exploring the role of public relations as a cultural intermediary occupation. Cultural Sociology, 6(4), 438–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/466240?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). Politics, culture and the public sphere: Towards a postmodern conception. In L. J. Nicholson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics (pp. 287–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2014). WikiLeaks and the critique of the political economy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2718–2732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh, S., & Zoller, H. M. (2012). Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory, 22, 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01396.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi, S., & Clegg, S. (2015). “These days will never be forgotten…”. A critical mass approach to online activism. Information and Organisation, 25, 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society (T. Burger with F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2004). Power and change: A critical reflection. In J. Boonstra (Ed.), Management of organizational change and learning. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, S. (1996). An intersubjective and social systemic public relations paradigm. Unpublished Masters dissertation. Internet version. www.susanne-holmstrom.dk © Susanne Holmström 1996.

  • Holtzhausen, D. (2012). Public relations as activism. Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P., & Demetrious, K. (2006). Engaging with stakeholders or constructing them? Attitudes and assumptions in stakeholder software. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 23, 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P. (2017). Learning in the age of digital reason. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jandrić, P., Hayes, S. L., Lacković, N., Knox, J., Suoranta, J., Ryberg, T., et al. (2018). Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPoe, V., Carter Olson, C. S., & LaPoe, B. R. (2018). Underserved communities and digital discourse: Getting voices heard. E-book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckett, T., & Pontarelli, F. (2016). Special report: South Africa. #OutsourcingMustFall: Unity in action in South African Universities. Field Notes. The Brooklyn Rail: Critical Perspectives on Arts, Politics, and Culture, March 2016. [Online]. Retrieved September 15, 2016, from https://brooklynrail.org/2016/03/field-notes/outsourcing-must-fall

  • MacNamara, J. (2016). Organizational listening: Addressing a major gap in public relations theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(3–4), 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Municipal IQ. (2018). Municipal data and intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.municipaliq.co.za

  • Omoto, A. M., Snyder, M., & Hackett, J. D. (2010). Personality and motivational antecedents of activism and civic engagement. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1703–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In W. Lance Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 97–118). The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.097

  • Rutherford, P. (2000). Endless propaganda: The advertising of public goods. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. (2013). Activism and symbolic capital in Western Australia: An ethnographic study of the anti-nuclear movement. Ph.D. thesis, Murdoch University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Strategic Communication, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa

    Dalien René Benecke

Authors
  1. Dalien René Benecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sonja Verwey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalien René Benecke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Elverum, Norway

    Martin N. Ndlela

  2. Communication and Media Research Institute (CAMRI), University of Westminster, Harrow Campus, Middlesex, UK

    Winston Mano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benecke, D.R., Verwey, S. (2020). Post Digital Dialogue and Activism in the Public Sphere. In: Ndlela, M., Mano, W. (eds) Social Media and Elections in Africa, Volume 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32682-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation