Abstract
This chapter highlights some of the weaknesses of shoehorning “new” elections into a model designed to demonstrate differences between national and European elections. It argues that using the terminology of first- and second-order elections is problematic given the new elections introduced to Britain over the last two decades. Rather than relying upon such terminology, it outlines how a more holistic classification of elections may be achieved and argues that in order to achieve this we should broaden our analysis of groups involved from simply voters to include political parties and the media. As well as offering a new method for understanding British elections, it argues that rather than distinguishing between first- and second-order a more accurate classification would differentiate elections based on geography—between national and subnational elections.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnett, G. (2016, February 1). MPs Ignorant of Key EU Institutions—Poll. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2016/feb/01/mps-ignorant-eu-institutions-poll-ipsos-mori-european-union. Accessed 6 Sept 2019.
Asquith, A. (2008). A Bullock, a Monkey and Robocop: An Assessment of the Directly Elected Mayor in English Local Government. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 39–53.
Audickas, L., Dempsey, N., & Keen, R. (2018, September 3). House of Commons Library Briefing Paper Number SN05125 Membership of UK Political Parties. Retrieved from House of Commons Library: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/.
Berkowitz, D. A. (1997). Social Meanings of News. London: Sage.
Blais, A., & Carty, R. K. (1990). Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout? European Journal of Political Research, 18, 167–181.
Bogdanor, V. (2004). The Constitution and the Party System in the Twentieth Century. Parliamentary Affairs, 57(4), 717–733.
Clark, A. (2018). Political Parties in the UK. London: Palgrave.
Cohen, S., & Young, J. (1973). The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media. London: Constable.
Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotoch, H. L. (1983). Media and Agenda Setting: Effects on the Public, Interest Groups Leaders, Policy Makers and Policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 16–35.
Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dearing, J. W., & Rodger, E. M. (1996). Agenda Setting. London: Sage.
Dery, D. (2000). Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies, 21(1), 37–47.
English, P., Grasso, M. T., Buraczynska, B., Karampampas, S., & Temple, L. (2016). Convergence on Crisis? Comparing Labour and Conservative Framing of the Economic Crisis in Britain, 2008–14. Politics & Policy, 44(3), 577–603.
Fenwick, J., & Elcock, H. (2014). Elected Mayors: Leading Locally? Local Government Studies, 40(4), 581–599.
Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. (2014). Revolt on the Right: Explaining the Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.
Harrop, M., & Miller, W. (1987). Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Heath, A., McLean, I., Taylor, B., & Curtice, J. (1999). Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 389–414.
Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 259–280.
Ipsos MORI. (2016, January). Economist/Ipsos MORI January 2016 Issues Index. Ipsos MORI. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/economist-ipsos-mori-january-2016-issues-index. Accessed 9 Dec 2018.
Karp, J. A., & Danducci, S. (2010). The Impact of Proportional Representation on Turnout: Evidence from New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 363–377.
Lucas, C. (2017, November 1). Caroline Lucas: A Fairer Electoral System Would Tackle Why People Don’t Vote. Electoral Reform Society. https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/-electoral-system-would-tackle-some-of-the-reasons-people-dont-vote/. Accessed 9 Dec 2018.
Mawby, R. I., & Smith, K. (2016). Civilian Oversight of the Police in England and Wales: The Election of Police and Crime Commissioners in 2012 and 2016. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 19(1), 23–30.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
Musson, S., John, P., & Tickell, A. (2009). Campaigning and the Media: The North-East Referendum of November 2004. In M. Sandford (Ed.), The Northern Veto (pp. 72–87). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Norris, P. (2003, August). Will New Technology Boost Turnout? Evaluating Experiments in E-Voting V: All-Postal Voting Facilities in UK Local Elections (KSG Working Papers Series No. RWP03-034) [online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.437140.
Pratchett, L., & Wingfield, M. (2004). Electronic Voting in the United Kingdom: Lessons and Limitations from the UK Experience. In N. Kersting & H. Baldershiem (Eds.), Electronic Voting and Democracy (pp. 172–189). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rose, R. (1984). Do Parties Make a Difference? London: Macmillan.
Schakel, A. H., & Jeffrey, C. (2013). Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections? Regional Studies, 47(3), 323–341.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1942). Party Government. New York: Rinehart.
Schmitt, H. (2005). The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order? West European Politics, 28(3), 650–679.
Selb, P. (2009). A Deeper Look at the Proportionality—Turnout Nexus. Comparative Political Studies, 42(4), 527–548.
Shoemaker, P. J. (1997). A New Gatekeeping Model. In D. Berkowirz (Ed.), Social Meaning of News (pp. 57–62). London: Sage.
Van Gorp, B. (2006). The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78.
Weaver, David H. (2007). Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing and Priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147.
White, D. M. (1997). The ‘Gatekeeper’: A Case Study in the Selection of News. In D. Berkowitz (Ed.), Social Meanings of News (pp. 63–71). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkland, C. (2020). New Approach. In: Classifying Elections in Britain. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32556-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32556-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32555-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32556-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)