Advertisement

Introduction

  • Christopher Kirkland
Chapter
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Elections are the most visual and engaging part of democracy. Yet not all elections are equal. Different elections have different rules relating to who can participate and in what contexts the interactions between voters and other institutions/groups operate. This chapter demonstrates some means by which different elections have hitherto been classified by introducing Reif and Schdmitt’s first- and second-order distinctions. It establishes how this became the dominant means of understanding elections following the introduction of the first European elections in 1979 and how such means of classification have been developed to incorporate new elections such as those introduced as part of New Labour’s devolution agenda.

Keywords

Elections First-order elections Second-order elections 

References

  1. Aitken & Cole. (1976). Tories Strike Double Blow at Labour. The Guardian. http://search.proquest.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/hnpguardianobserver/docview/185934054/14F681DB9FD14838PQ/1?accountid=13828. Accessed 22 June 2015.
  2. Batchelor, T. (2019, May 23). European Elections: Hundreds of EU Citizens ‘Turned Away from Polling Stations and Denied Vote’. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/european-elections-eu-citizens-polling-card-station-vote-a8927016.html. Accessed 19 July 2019.
  3. Beetham, D. (2005). Democracy: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, J., Denver, D., Mitchell, J., & Bennie, L. (2007). Devolution and Party Change: Candidate Selection for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly Elections. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(3), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckland, C. (1976a). Hammered. Daily Mirror. http://www.ukpressonline.co.uk.eresources.shef.ac.uk/ukpressonline/view/pagview/DMir_1976_11_05_001. Accessed 22 June 2015.
  6. Buckland, C. (1976b). D-Day for Jim. Daily Mirror [online]. http://www.ukpressonline.co.uk.eresources.shef.ac.uk/ukpressonline/view/pagview/DMir_1976_11_04_002. Accessed 22 June 2015.
  7. Corbett, R. (2014). ‘European Elections Are Second-Order Elections’: Is Received Wisdom Changing. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1194–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutler, F. (2008). One Voter, Two First-Order Elections? Electoral Studies, 27(3), 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Democratic Audit. (2019, April 18). Local Elections 2019: Uncontested Seats Mean Thousands of Voters Will Be Denied Their Democratic Rights. Democratic Audit. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2019/04/18/local-elections-2019-uncontested-seats-mean-thousands-of-voters-will-be-denied-their-democratic-rights/. Accessed 15 June 2019.
  10. Denver, D., Johns, R., & Carman, C. (2012). Elections and Voters in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowding, K. (2012). The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flinders, M. (2011). Devolution, Delegation and the Westminster Model: A Comparative Analysis of Developments with the UK, 1998–2009. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ford, R., Goodwin, M., & Cutts, D. (2012). Strategic Eurosceptics and Polite Xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections. European Journal of Political Research, 51(2), 204–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golder, S. N., Lago, I., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Gschwend, T. (2017). Multi-level Electoral Politics: Beyond the Second-Order Election Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heath, A., McLean, I., Taylor, B., & Curtice, J. (1999). Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 389–414.Google Scholar
  16. Heffernan, R. (2013). There’s No Need for the ‘-sation’: The Prime Minister Is Merely Prime Ministerial. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hill, E., Sobolewska, M., Wilks-Heeg, S., & Borkowska, M. (2017). Explaining Electoral Fraud in an Advanced Democracy: Fraud Vulnerabilities, Opportunities and Facilitating Mechanisms in British Elections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 772–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. James, T. S. (2012). The Spill-Over and Displacement Effects of Implementing Election Administration Reforms: Introducing Individual Electoral Registration in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, R., & Pattie, C. (2014). Electing Police and Crime Commissioners in England and Wales, 2012 as Second-Order Elections. Representation, 50(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kendle, J. (1997). Federal Britain: A History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. McFadden, J., & Lazarowicz, M. (2003). The Scottish Parliament: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Norris, P. (1990). British By-Elections: The Volatile Electorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Norris, P. (2015). Why Elections Fail. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rallings, C., & Thrasher, M. (2005). Not All ‘Second-Order’ Contest Are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 584–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reif, K. (1984). European Elections 1979/81 and 1984. Berlin: Quorum.Google Scholar
  26. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections—A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2015). Devolution in England, the British Political Tradition and the Absence of Consultation, Consensus and Consideration. Representation, 51(4), 385–401.Google Scholar
  28. Schakel, A. H., & Jeffrey, C. (2013). Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections? Regional Studies, 47(3), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scully, R., Jones, R., & Trystan, D. (2004). Turnout, Participation and Legitimacy in Post Devolution Wales. British Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Trystan, D., Scully, R., & Jones, R. W. (2003). Explaining the ‘Quiet Earthquake’: Voting Behaviour in the First Election to the National Assembly for Wales. Electoral Studies, 22, 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker, P. (2019, July 22). About 750 People Denied Vote in ID Trial at Local Elections. The Guardian [online]. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/22/about-750-people-denied-vote-id-trial-local-elections. Accessed 22 July 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Kirkland
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Humanities, Religion and PhilosophyYork St John UniversityYorkUK

Personalised recommendations