Skip to main content

Why Did Young Norwegians Mobilize: External Events or Early Enfranchisement?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lowering the Voting Age to 16

Abstract

Since the terrorist attacks in Norway in July 2011, there has been a general rise in political participation among young Norwegians. This was evident just a few weeks after the attack, when turnout among first-time voters (the age group 18–21) went up by 11 percentage points in the local elections (to 46%). In those September 2011 elections, the voting age was lowered from 18 to 16 in a selected group of 20 municipalities. Turnout was also quite high among 16- and 17-year olds (58%). This level of participation has remained stable among young voters in later elections. Relying on quantitative data on turnout by age, membership in political youth parties and qualitative interviews with first-time voters, the chapter discusses how three different mechanisms—life cycle, generational and period effects—may explain this mobilization. The authors find strong life-cycle effects which account for stable differences between age groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aardal, B., & Valen, H. (1995). Konflikt og opinion. Oslo: NKS-forlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (1998). Change and continuity in the 1996 elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allern, E., Heidar, K., & Karlsen, R. (2016). After the mass party: Continuity and change in political parties and representation in Norway. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bali, V. (2007). Terror and elections: Lessons from Spain. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 669–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L., & Jackman, S. (2014). A generational model of political learning. Electoral Studies, 33, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, J. (2013a). Does voting rights affect the political maturity of 16- and 17-year-olds? Findings from the 2011 Norwegian voting-age trial. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, J. (2013b). Valgdeltakelse i ulike aldersgrupper. Historisk utvikling og oppdaterte tall fra stortingsvalget 2013. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, J. (2015). Generasjon Utøya? Politisk deltakelse og engasjement blant ungdom. In B. Aardal & J. Bergh (Eds.), Valg og velgere. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. (2010). Valgdeltagelsen blandt danske unge. København: Institutt for Statskundskap: Københavns Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. (2012a). Leaving the nest and the social act of voting: Turnout among first-time voters. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22(4), 380–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, Y., & Hansen, K. (2012b). The effect of generation and age on turnout to the European Parliament: How turnout will continue to decline in the future. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 262–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, Y., Hansen, K., & Wass, H. (2012). The relationship between age and turnout: A roller-coaster ride. Electoral Studies, 31(3), 588–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N., & Nadeau, R. (2004). Where does turnout decline come from? European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T., & Clayton, M. (2006). Should the voting age be lowered to sixteen? Normative and empirical considerations. Political Studies, 54(3), 533–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1976). The dynamics of party support: Cohort-analyzing party identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, R., & Prewitt, K. (1969). Political socialization: An analytical study. Boston: Little, Brown series in comparative politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953). The political system. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. (2002). Generations, culture and society. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Electoral Commission. (2004). The age of electoral majority: Report and recommendations. London: Electoral Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (2005). You want to vote where everybody knows your name: Anonymity, expressive engagement, and turnout among young adults. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, 1 September 2005, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, A. (2009). Where else does turnout decline come from? Education, age, generation and period effects in three European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highton, B., & Wolfinger, R. (2001). The first seven years of the political life cycle. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. (1959). Political socialization: A study in the psychology of political behavior. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, J. (2017). Deltagelse i folkeavstemningene. In J. Saglie & S. Segaard (Eds.), Lokale folkeavstemninger om kommunesammenslåing. Praksis og prinsipper. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konzelmann, L., Wagner, C., & Rattinger, H. (2012). Turnout in Germany in the course of time: Life cycle and cohort effects on electoral turnout from 1953 to 2049. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: RKP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. (1965). Political participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (2010). The Internet generation: Engaged citizens or political dropouts. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ødegård, G. (2014). Små partier – store endringer. Medlemskap i ungdomspartiene i Norge 1998–2011. Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning, 14(1), 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ødegård, G., & Aars, J. (2011). Ungdom, valgdeltagelse og stemmerett. En kunnskapsoversikt. Oslo and Bergen: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ødegård, G., & Saglie, J. (2013). Stemmerett for 16-åringer: Forsøk som flernivåinnovasjon. In T. Ringholm, H. Teigen, & N. Aarsæther (Eds.), Innovative kommuner. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saglie, J., Ødegård, G., & Aars, J. (2015). Rekruttering av unge folkevalgte: nominasjoner, personstemmer og kontekst. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 56(3), 259–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, T., & Putnam, R. (2010). Still bowling alone? The post-9/11 split. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, K. (2012). A widening generational divide? The age gap in voter turnout through time and space. Journal of Election, Public Opinion and Parties, 22(4), 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, M., Brader, T., Coral, D., Curtin, R., Featherman, D., Groves, R., et al. (2002). How Americans responded: A study of public reactions to 9/11/01. Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 511–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Johann, D., & Kritzinger, S. (2012). Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 372–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, H. (2007). The effects of age, generation and period on turnout in Finland 1975–2003. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebæk, D., Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Ødegård, G. (2011). Hva gjør terroren med oss som sivilsamfunn? Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebæk, D., Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Ødegård, G. (2012a). After Utøya: How a high-trust society reacts to terror—Trust and civic engagement in the aftermath of July 22. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(1), 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebæk, D., Enjolras, B., Steen-Johnsen, K., & Ødegård, G. (2012b). Ett år etter 22. juli. Har rosetoget gått? Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn og frivillig sektor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeglovits, E., & Aichholzer, J. (2014). Are people more inclined to vote at 16 than at 18? Evidence for the first-time voting boost among 16- to 25-year-olds in Austria. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(3), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the ECPR General Conference in Glasgow, September 2014, at the conference Democracy: A Citizen Perspective, Åbo, 27–28 May 2015, and at the conference Youth Political Participation: The Diverse Roads to Democracy, Montréal, 15–17 June 2016. We would like to thank the conference participants for valuable comments, and the Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernization for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Bergh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ødegård, G., Bergh, J., Saglie, J. (2020). Why Did Young Norwegians Mobilize: External Events or Early Enfranchisement?. In: Eichhorn, J., Bergh, J. (eds) Lowering the Voting Age to 16. Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics