Mechanized Collection and Densification of Rice Straw
- 7.8k Downloads
The introduction of combine harvesters has made rice straw collection a major challenge and has brought bottlenecks to the rice straw supply chain. Due to this and the lack of knowledge on the straw’s alternative uses, farmers burn the biomass in the field for ease of land preparation. This practice creates negative impacts on human health and the environment. However, as an alternative to burning, some Asian countries are developing increasing demands for rice straw for mushroom production, cattle feedstock, power generation, and building materials.
Mechanized straw collection has become necessary to increase capacity and to lower transportation costs. Baling machines can collect and compact rice straw in varying forms and densities. In the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam, adoption of rice straw balers have significantly improved rice straw management. A baler hauled by a 30-HP tractor has a collection capacity equal to five people, solving the labor shortage problem in rice straw collection. In addition, the volumetric weight of mechanically compacted straw bales is 50–100% higher than that of loose straw, which significantly reduces handling and transportation costs. High-density compaction (e.g., stationary compaction, briquetting, and pelletizing) can further increase the volumetric weight of baled straw from 400% to 700%, reducing transportation costs by more than 60%.
Mechanized rice straw collection and densification have contributed to improvement of the supply chain and resulted in sustainable management of rice straw. This chapter discusses the different technologies for rice straw collection, enumerating the benefits and downsides, as well as options for further densification to reduce transportation and handling costs. The benefits and costs of various alternatives for mechanized straw collection and densification are compared and further elaborated.
KeywordsMechanized straw collection Rice straw balers Densification Straw compaction Briquetting Pelletizing
The intensification of rice production and rising labor costs have led to the spread of combine harvesters in Asian rice fields at harvest time. Combine harvesters leave loose rice straw on the ground, making its collection and transportation difficult, laborious, and costly. Annually, about from 600 to 800 million tons of rice straw are produced in Asia; globally approximately 1 billion tons are produced (Sarkar and Aikat 2013; McLaughlin et al. 2016). Farmers choose the quick solution of burning rice straw to quickly remove the biomass and prepare the field for the next crop. In-field burning of rice straw contributes to the emission of greenhouse gas (GHG) and poses health and environmental hazards. In addition, the potential energy that can be derived from the biomass is lost (Tabil et al. 2011).
Loose rice straw is low in density, irregular in size and shape, and difficult to handle manually. Transportation and storage of rice straw in its original form are labor-intensive and costly. The amount of rice straw available for alternative uses would be limited if there is no better way to collect it after harvest. Collecting machines make it feasible to remove a huge amount of straw in a short time (between two cropping seasons): thus, they are more economical and efficient than manual collection.
Collection of rice straw in the field using balers is becoming common in many Asian countries such as China, India, Cambodia, Vietnam, the Philippines, and Thailand, partly due to environmental regulations against field burning due to its many harmful effects (see Chaps. 8, 9, and 10). Straw needs to be gathered from the field and compressed into bales to make it compact and easy to transport. Collecting dry rice straw (moisture content at 22–32% wet basis) during the dry season is easy with a baling machine because it is lighter and does not clog the machine during baling. On the other hand, working on a wet field is quite difficult and compressing wet straw is a big challenge for the baling mechanism and requires more energy.
High-density compaction of rice straw can produce high-end market products such as high-density square bales, briquettes, and pellets, the use of which can reduce handling and transportation costs and improve processing efficiency. (Adapa et al. 2011; Emami et al. 2014).
The densification of loose biomass, such as rice straw, provides several advantages such as (1) improved handling and conveyance efficiencies throughout the supply system and biorefinery in feed, (2) controlled particle size distribution for improved feedstock uniformity and density, (3) fractional structural components for improved compositional quality, and (4) conformance to predetermined conversion technology and supply system specifications (Tumuluru et al. 2010). The common methods used to achieve densification of loose biomass, such as rice straw, includes extrusion, compacting, briquetting, or pelletizing (Demirbas and Sahin-Demirbas 2009; Tumuluru et al. 2010).
2.2 Mechanized Collection of Rice Straw
2.3 Overview of Mechanized Straw Collection Technologies
Mechanized collection of straw scattered in the field involves three main operations: (1) picking up the straw from the field, (2) compressing it into bales, and (3) transporting the bales to the bunds. In some areas, there are also some machines that just pick up the straw in loose form and transport it to the side of the field for further densification and transport.
2.4 Commonly Used Rice Straw Balers in Asia
Small balers are better adopted and adapted in Asia as most rice fields are small at an average of about 0.05–0.4 ha (Gummert et al. 2019). Both round and square balers are adopted depending on many factors, such as soil and field conditions; preferences on bale weight; handling, transportation, storage, and multiple use purposes; and available tractors. For example, in Vietnam, farmers prefer small round balers because of their suitability for available tractors, speed in small fields, and the weight of the bales (12 kg bale−1) produced is suitable for manual handling.
Another type of self-propelled loose straw collection machine (Fig. 2.7b) was also developed based on the principle similar to the self-propelled baler except that it does not have a compacting component. This machine is used to gather scattered straw on the field and transport it loose to the side of the field.
Typical straw balers used in Asia, working characteristics, and associated costs of collection
Examples of manufacturer
Types of movement
Working conditions and straw location
Weight of the bales at 14% MC (kg bale−1)
Engine power (HP)
Fuel consumption (L t−1)
Collection cost (US$ t−1)a
Loose-straw collection machine with rubber tracks
Powered by its own engine and transmission system, typically on rubber tracks
Both dry and wet fields; equipped with a loading platform for hauling loose straw to the side of the field
Hauled to baling location
Manual feeding of straw for stationary baling; needs 3–5 operators; bale dimension is 1.5 m wide × 2.5 m long
Self-propelled baler with rubber tracks
Powered by its own engine and transmission system
Both dry and wet fields; equipped with a loading platform for hauling round straw bales to the side of the field.
CLAAS; STAR; John Deere
Hauled by a 4WD tractor
Operates with rollers to form round bales that are left in the field
13–15 (small); 500–600 (big)
2–3 (small); 3–4 (big)
CLAAS; New Holland
Hauled by a 4WD tractor
Uses piston to make bales and can move continuously without stopping for unloading bales; can bale 1.5–2 t h−1
Round balers need to stop intermittently whenever bales are being discharged from the machines. Square balers, on the other hand, can be operated continuously in the field. Square bales are easy to pile and require much less space for storage than round bales. However, energy efficiency almost works out the same for both balers because a round baler has fewer power requirements than a square baler, which needs more power for compressing and baling. Round balers can also run much faster than square balers.
Rice Straw Collection in Thailand, China, and India
In Thailand, government prohibition of rice straw burning in fields has prompted farmers and the private sector to collect straw left in the field and sell it for alternative uses such as mulching and animal feedstock. The use of square balers to optimize the collection of the straw for biomass power generation has also become popular in Thailand. The cost of collection with square balers varies from US$ 18–20 t−1 for both of small sand large square bales in Thailand (Delivand et al. 2011).
In China, the need for systems to collect, process, and transport rice straw encouraged the introduction of many types of balers. Small, round steel-roll balers are popular in the countryside, given their simple structure and low power requirements of about 13–20 kW (Wang et al. 2011).
In India, around 120,000 t of rice straw are collected annually to add 12 megawatts of electricity to the local power grid. The huge demand for rice straw requires larger balers, such as the widely used commercial CLAAS Markant 55 (Hegazy and Sandro 2016).
2.5 High-Density Straw Compacting, Briquetting, and Pelletizing
Transporting bales after collection from the field has become feasible and costs less than transporting loose straw. However, for high-end markets, such as industrial cattle farms, large amounts of rice straw (e.g., more than 20,000 t for a cattle farm in Vietnam) must be transported long distances (sometimes more than 500 km) and stored for from 3 to 6 months. Round bales should be compacted into larger and higher-density square bales to reduce transportation and storage costs.
Compacting the bales utilizes technologies that apply high pressure, such as screw or piston presses. A few compacting machines that use the piston press are found in Asia. Two common variations are the vertical and horizontal compacting systems.
188.8.131.52 Vertical Compacting
184.108.40.206 Horizontal Compacting
Briquettes are also produced through: (1) the press-chamber principle, which consists of two parts: a heated die that acts as a press and a punch that fits in tight; (2) the screw principle, based on continuous extrusion of the feedstock by a screw through a heated tape die; and (3) a piston press, where a reciprocating ram presses the straw biomass in a die. The finished products would have varying energy density depending on the technology used (Munder 2013).
As fuel briquettes have an advantage over loose rice straw in terms of higher volumetric calorific value, improved combustion characteristics, ease of use when feeding the furnace, and uniformity in size and shape. A rice straw briquette has an average length of 10 mm (Munder 2013) and a density of up to 0.97 g cm−3, which is 48 times the density of loose rice straw.
Compared with other compacting processes, such as briquetting and tumble agglomeration, pellets are generally regarded as the most durable because they are placed under the highest amount of pressure during formation (Whittaker and Shield 2017). Pelletizing can increase the bulk density of the biomass from an initial value of 40–200 kg m−3 to a final bulk density of 600–800 kg m−3. Pelletizing can overcome hurdles in cost and logistics in utilizing loose straw for energy or animal feedstock.
The product quality and calorific value of straw to be pelletized can be improved by mixing it with various additives, such as starch, molasses, ash, montan resin, paraffin, palmitin, and anthracite and lignite coal. The compressing pressure is the most significant factor affecting pellet density and the biomass type significantly affects pellet durability (Adapa et al. 2011). The physical quality of compacted loose biomass materials is partly indicated by compressive strengths, durability, stability, and smoothness (Demirbas and Sahin-Demirbas 2009). The specific energy requirements of different types of biomass for compression vary according to the compressed density of materials and the moisture content of biomass inputs. Density is identified as an important parameter in compression, i.e., the higher the density, the higher the energy/volume ratio.
Pelletized rice straw can be used as fuel, animal feedstock, or material for anaerobic digestion. The pelletizer die hole size is known to have an important effect on the moisture content of the pellet, while the temperature reached during pelletization can also influence pellet quality.
Straw densification through pelletizing can increase bulk density from 600 to 800 kg m−3 (Kaliyan and Morey 2009; Kargbo et al. 2009). The average specific mass of a straw pellet may also reach 1244 kg m−3, which is higher by 1000% compared with loose straw. Said et al. (2015) reported that the ideal value for high-quality pellets is 1200 kg m−3. Pelletized rice straw has an advantage of preventing straw materials from floating in water when using the straw for other processes such as anaerobic digestion. The use of enriched pellets as feed for cows results in minimal waste and leftovers during feeding.
The production costs of rice straw pellets are computed based on the estimated cost of equipment and assumed cost of straw and labor at the locality (including depreciation, material, and labor costs). In one case study in Vietnam (Nguyen-Van-Hieu et al. 2018), materials (straw and cattle feed additives) cost US$ 280 t−1; straw prices ranged from US$ 90 to 100 t−1; and depreciation, labor, and electricity costs were estimated based on the existing rice husk pelletizing system. Given a pelletizing cost of US$ 22.6 t−1, straw pellets cost approximately US$ 125 t−1. Pelletizing can significantly reduce transportation costs. In the same case study, a cubic bale was sold at a price of US$ 110 t−1 excluding transportation cost, which was about US$ 35.5 t−1 for a distance of 1000 km by truck. The cost of grinding straw was estimated at US$ 100 t−1. Transporting pelletized straw was found to be more economical and practical compared to bales.
2.6 Conclusions and Recommendations
Alongside the spread of combine harvesters, government regulations against open field burning of rice straw, and increasing use of straw, mechanized collection is gaining ground in Asia. Small balers with a capacity of 1–2 t h−1, which are easy to maneuver in small fields, have been found suitable in Cambodia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. The self-propelled baler—a successful innovation in Vietnam—is being adapted in Southeast Asian countries, such as Cambodia and the Philippines, because it reduces labor requirements in hauling baled straw from the field to the bund. Another advantage is the machine’s rubber chain-wheel mechanism, which makes it suitable for use in wet fields, particularly in areas where field drainage is a problem.
A case study in Vietnam showed that mechanized collection can reduce costs by about 68% compared to manual collection. As labor scarcity rises, machines become a more sustainable option for Asian rice fields where farmers have traditionally resorted burning straw after harvest, which is easier and cheaper.
As Asian countries move towards field consolidation and upgrading of contractual arrangements among farmers, mechanized collection is likely to become more efficient. Further research has to be conducted to understand field efficiency vis-à-vis field capacity so that (1) the use of baler machines is optimized, (2) the sustainability of custom servicing business models is assured; and (3) machine owners are adequately informed on the viability of their investments.
Rice straw densification—through compacting, briquetting, or pelletizing—results in better handling and storage of the byproduct, which, in turn, reduces transportation costs and makes efficient use of storage facilities. The technologies now available, such as briquette presses and pelletizers, also provide options for other uses of rice straw, such as animal feed, fuel, and feedstock for energy generation.
The processing of loose straw into pellets can further save transportation costs and improve logistical processes as experienced in Vietnam. Research is still required to improve the quality of densified straw, either for animal feed or fuel. Researchers should look into locally available binding materials that are cheap and of high quality to improve pellet and briquette properties in terms of strength, durability, density, nutrition (for animal feed), and calorific value (for fuel).
- Adapa P, Tabil L, Schoenau G (2011) A comprehensive analysis of the factors affecting densification of barley, canola, oat and wheat straw grinds. Written for presentation at the CSBE/SCGAB 2011 Annual Conference Inn at the Forks, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 10–13 July 2011Google Scholar
- Emami S, Tabil GL, Adapa P, George E, Tilay A, Dalai A, Drisdelle M, Ketabi L (2014) Effect of fuel additives on agricultural straw pellet quality. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2:92–100Google Scholar
- Gummert M, Quilty J, Hung NV, Vial L (2019) Engineering and management of rice harvesting. In: Pan Z, Khir R (eds) Advances in science and engineering of Rice. DEStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, pp 67–102Google Scholar
- Hegazy R, Sandro J (2016) Report: rice straw collection. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301770258
- Kargbo FR, Xing J, Zhang Y (2009) Pretreatment for energy use of rice straw: a review. Afr J Agric Res 4(13):1560–1565Google Scholar
- McLaughlin O, Mawhood B, Jamieson C, Slade R (2016) Rice straw for bioenergy: The effectiveness of policymaking and implementation in Asia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305882098
- Munder S (2013) Improving thermal conversion properties of rice straw by briquetting. Masters thesis, Nachwachsende Rohstoffe und Bioenergie. Unbiversitat Hohenheim, Institute Fur AgrartechnikGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen-Van-Hieu, Nguyen-Thanh-Nghi, Le-Quang-Vinh, Le-Minh-Anh, Nguyen-Van-Hung, Gummert M (2018) Developing densified products to reduce transportation costs and improve the quality of rice straw feedstocks for cattle feeding. J Vietnamese Environ 10(1):11–15Google Scholar
- Sarkar N, Aikat K (2013) Kinetic study of acid hydrolysis of rice straw. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. ISRN Biotechnology https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/170615
- Tabil L, Adapa P, Kashaninejad M (2011) Biomass feedstock preprocessing–Part 2: Densification. In Bernardes MADS (ed) Biofuel’s Engineering Process Technology, p. 439–464Google Scholar
- Tumuluru JS, Wright CT, Kenny KL, Hess JR (2010) A review on biomass densification technologies for energy application. Idaho National Laboratory, Biofuels and Renewable Energies Tehcnologies Department, Energy Systems and Technologies Division, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/305d/4fb8d8c782e40caa9 6847d555e02159b9c74.pdf
- Wang D, Buckmster DR, Jiang Y, Hua J (2011) Experimental study on baling rice straw silage. Int J Agric & Biol Eng 1. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2011.01.000-000
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.