Skip to main content

Model-Based Recommendations for Optimal Surgical Placement of Epiretinal Implants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (MICCAI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 11768))

Abstract

A major limitation of current electronic retinal implants is that in addition to stimulating the intended retinal ganglion cells, they also stimulate passing axon fibers, producing perceptual ‘streaks’ that limit the quality of the generated visual experience. Recent evidence suggests a dependence between the shape of the elicited visual percept and the retinal location of the stimulating electrode. However, this knowledge has yet to be incorporated into the surgical placement of retinal implants. Here we systematically explored the space of possible implant configurations to make recommendations for optimal intraocular positioning of the electrode array. Using a psychophysically validated computational model, we demonstrate that better implant placement has the potential to reduce the spatial extent of axonal activation in existing implant users by up to \(\sim \)55%. Importantly, the best implant location, as inferred from a population of simulated virtual patients, is both surgically feasible and is relatively stable across individuals. This study is a first step towards the use of computer simulations in patient-specific planning of retinal implant surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahuja, A.K., Behrend, M.R.: The \({Argus}^{\text{TM}}\) II retinal prosthesis: factors affecting patient selection for implantation. Prog. Retinal Eye Res. 36, 1–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beyeler, M., Boynton, G.M., Fine, I., Rokem, A.: pulse2percept: a Python-based simulation framework for bionic vision. In: Huff, K., Lippa, D., Niederhut, D., Pacer, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Science in Python Conference, pp. 81–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25080/shinma-7f4c6e7-00c

  3. Beyeler, M.: Biophysical model of axonal stimulation in epiretinal visual prostheses. In: 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER), pp. 348–351 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2019.8716969

  4. Beyeler, M., Nanduri, D., Weiland, J.D., Rokem, A., Boynton, G.M., Fine, I.: A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants. Sci. R. 9(1), 9199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45416-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fine, I., Boynton, G.M.: Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 370(1677), 20140208 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fried, S.I., Lasker, A.C.W., Desai, N.J., Eddington, D.K., Rizzo, J.F.: Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 101(4), 1972–1987 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91081.2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jansonius, N.M., et al.: A mathematical description of nerve fiber bundle trajectories and their variability in the human retina. Vis. Res. 49(17), 2157–2163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, Y.H., Zhong, J.J., Clemo, M., da Cruz, L.: Long-term repeatability and reproducibility of phosphene characteristics in chronically implanted argus(R) II retinal prosthesis subjects. A. J. Ophthalmol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rachitskaya, A.V., Yuan, A., Marino, M.J., Reese, J., Ehlers, J.P.: Intraoperative OCT imaging of the argus II retinal prosthesis system. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina 47(11), 999–1003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20161031-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Second Sight Medical Products: Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Surgeon Manual (2013). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf11/h110002c.pdf

  11. Weitz, A.C., et al.: Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration. Sci. Transl. Med. 7(318), 318ra203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aac4877

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by the Washington Research Foundation Funds for Innovation in Neuroengineering and Data-Intensive Discovery (M.B.), by an award from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Award #2013-10-29) and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Award #3835) to the University of Washington eScience Institute (A.R.), and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH K99 EY-029329 to M.B., EY-12925 to G.M.B., and EY-014645 to I.F.).Research credits for cloud computing were provided by Amazon Web Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Beyeler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beyeler, M., Boynton, G.M., Fine, I., Rokem, A. (2019). Model-Based Recommendations for Optimal Surgical Placement of Epiretinal Implants. In: Shen, D., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019. MICCAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11768. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32254-0_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32254-0_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32253-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32254-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics