Abstract
Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)-based bioink enables the improved recapitulation of actual microenvironments when compared with conventional bioinks. When applied to the 3D printing technology, dECM facilitate the engineering of more realistic living constructs, including elaborate microarchitecture as well as biochemical environments of target tissues/organs. This chapter provides the fundamental knowledge of a dECM bioink such as the sources of native tissue/organ for decellularization, evaluation of decellularization process, and safety. Besides, by introducing the various applications of dECM bioinks, the superiority of dECM bioinks compared with conventional bioinks is covered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3675–83.
Hoganson DM, O’Doherty EM, Owens GE, Harilal DO, Goldman SM, Bowley CM, Neville CM, Kronengold RT, Vacanti JP. The retention of extracellular matrix proteins and angiogenic and mitogenic cytokines in a decellularized porcine dermis. Biomaterials. 2010;31(26):6730–7.
Elliott RA Jr, Hoehn JG. Use of commercial porcine skin for wound dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;52(4):401–5.
Pati F, Jang J, Ha D-H, Kim SW, Rhie J-W, Shim J-H, Kim D-H, Cho D-W. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3935.
Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, Naing MW. Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(8):787–805.
Denner J, Tönjes RR. Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(2):318–43.
Moses HL, Roberts AB, Derynck R. The discovery and early days of TGF-β: a historical perspective. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(7):a021865.
Habiro K, Sykes M, Yang YG. Induction of human T‐cell tolerance to pig xenoantigens via thymus transplantation in mice with an established human immune system. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(6):1324–9.
Komoda H, Okura H, Lee CM, Sougawa N, Iwayama T, Hashikawa T, Saga A, Yamamoto-Kakuta A, Ichinose A, Murakami S. Reduction of N-glycolylneuraminic acid xenoantigen on human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells/mesenchymal stem cells leads to safer and more useful cell sources for various stem cell therapies. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;16(4):1143–55.
Sandrin M, Mckenzie IF. Galα (1, 3) Gal, the major xenoantigen (s) recognised in pigs by human natural antibodies. Immunol Rev. 1994;141(1):169–90.
Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32(12):3233–43.
Kasimir M-T, Rieder E, Seebacher G, Silberhumer G, Wolner E, Weigel G, Simon P. Comparison of different decellularization procedures of porcine heart valves. Int J Artif Organs. 2003;26(5):421–7.
Gallagher SR. Quantitation of DNA and RNA with absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2011;56(1):A.1K.1–A.1K.14.
Noothi SK, Kombrabail M, Kundu TK, Krishnamoorthy G, Rao BJ. Enhanced DNA dynamics due to cationic reagents, topological states of dsDNA and high mobility group box 1 as probed by PicoGreen. FEBS J. 2009;276(2):541–51.
Barbosa I, Garcia S, Barbier-Chassefière V, Caruelle J-P, Martelly I, Papy-García D. Improved and simple micro assay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans quantification in biological extracts and its use in skin and muscle tissue studies. Glycobiology. 2003;13(9):647–53.
Hofman K, Hall B, Cleaver H, Marshall S. High-throughput quantification of hydroxyproline for determination of collagen. Anal Biochem. 2011;417(2):289–91.
Kim BS, Kwon YW, Kong J-S, Park GT, Gao G, Han W, Kim M-B, Lee H, Kim JH, Cho D-W. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2018;168:38–53.
Lee H, Han W, Kim H, Ha D-H, Jang J, Kim BS, Cho D-W. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(4):1229–37.
Welham NV, Chang Z, Smith LM, Frey BL. Proteomic analysis of a decellularized human vocal fold mucosa scaffold using 2D electrophoresis and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Biomaterials. 2013;34(3):669–76.
Wiles K, Fishman JM, De Coppi P, Birchall MA. The host immune response to tissue-engineered organs: current problems and future directions. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016;22(3):208–19.
Fujii K, Yamagishi T, Nagafuchi T, Tsuji M, Kuboki Y. Biochemical properties of collagen from ligaments and periarticular tendons of the human knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(4):229–33.
Fratzl P. Collagen: structure and mechanics, an introduction. Collagen. New York, NY: Springer; 2008. p. 1–13.
Samuel CS. Determination of collagen content, concentration, and sub-types in kidney tissue. Kidney research. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. p. 223–35.
Nalinanon S, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Kishimura H. Tuna pepsin: characteristics and its use for collagen extraction from the skin of threadfin bream (Nemipterus spp.). J Food Sci. 2008;73(5):C413–9.
Li H, Tan YJ, Leong KF, Li L. 3D bioprinting of highly thixotropic alginate/methylcellulose hydrogel with strong interface bonding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(23):20086–97.
Liu W, Heinrich MA, Zhou Y, Akpek A, Hu N, Liu X, Guan X, Zhong Z, Jin X, Khademhosseini A. Extrusion bioprinting of shear‐thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(12):1601451.
Hölzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, Van Vlierberghe S, Gu L, Ovsianikov A. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2016;8(3):032002.
Rathan S, Dejob L, Schipani R, Haffner B, Möbius ME, Kelly DJ. Fiber reinforced cartilage ECM Functionalized bioinks for functional cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:e1801501.
Cox TR, Erler JT. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(2):165–78.
Kim J, Shim IK, Hwang DG, Lee YN, Kim M, Kim H, Kim S-W, Lee S, Kim SC, Cho D-W. 3D cell printing of islet-laden pancreatic tissue-derived extracellular matrix bioink constructs for enhancing pancreatic functions. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(10):1773–81.
Kim H, Park M-N, Kim J, Jang J, Kim H-K, Cho D-W. Characterization of cornea-specific bioink: high transparency, improved in vivo safety. J Tiss Eng. 2019;10:2041731418823382.
Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, Kim S-W, Kwon S-M, Cho D-W. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:88–95.
Ali M, Yoo JJ, Zahran F, Atala A, Lee SJ. A photo‐crosslinkable kidney ECM‐derived bioink accelerates renal tissue formation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:e1800992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cho, DW., Kim, B.S., Jang, J., Gao, G., Han, W., Singh, N.K. (2019). Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks. In: 3D Bioprinting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32222-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32222-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32221-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32222-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)