Skip to main content

Evaluation of Excised Lymph Nodes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Practical Lymph Node and Bone Marrow Pathology

Part of the book series: Practical Anatomic Pathology ((PAP))

  • 1493 Accesses

Abstract

Excisional biopsy of lymph node is a routine procedure for evaluating lymphoid pathology in patients with lymphadenopathy. A standard workup to rule out lymphoma is a comprehensive study, including histologic evaluation, immunohistochemical analysis, flow cytometry, cytogenetic study (i.e., FISH for targeted cytogenetic abnormalities), and/or molecular diagnostic tests. This chapter covers some general principles for handling specimens of lymphoma workup, clinical correlation with types of lymphoma, common morphological patterns of lymphomas or mimics, and judicial application of ancillary tests, based on clinical presentations and initial morphologic evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salzman BE, Lamb K, Olszewski RF, Tully A, Studdiford J. Diagnosing cancer in the symptomatic patient. Prim Care. 2009;36(4):651–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaddey HL, Riegel AM. Unexplained lymphadenopathy: evaluation and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(11):896–903.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King D, Ramachandra J, Yeomanson D. Lymphadenopathy in children: refer or reassure? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2014;99(3):101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Locke R, Comfort R, Kubba H. When does an enlarged cervical lymph node in a child need excision? A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(3):393–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nolder AR. Paediatric cervical lymphadenopathy: when to biopsy? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;21(6):567–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esra AÖ, Ceren CG, Zeynep TÖ, Serdar Y, Nuri EG, Meryem D, et al. Evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy with excisional biopsy: six-year experience. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(11):15234–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiappini E, Camaioni A, Benazzo M, Biondi A, Bottero S, De Masi S, et al. Development of an algorithm for the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in children: consensus of the Italian Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics, jointly with the Italian Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Italian Society of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2015;13(12):1557–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karadeniz C, Oguz A, Ezer U, Oztürk G, Dursun A. The etiology of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1999;16(6):525–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steel BL, Schwartz MR, Ramzy I. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in 1,103 patients. Role, limitations and analysis of diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 1995;39(1):76–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desciak EB, Maloney ME. Artifacts in frozen section preparation: how I do it/back to basics. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:500–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rakha EA, Haider A, Patil S, et al. Evaluation of touch preparation cytology during frozen-section diagnoses of pulmonary lesions. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:675–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brunner C, Brunner-Herglotz B, Ziegler A, Frech C, Amann G, Ladenstein R, et al. Tumor touch imprints as source for whole genome analysis of neuroblastoma tumors. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161369.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loo E, Siddiqi IN. Processing the lymph node biopsy. In: Day C, editor. Histopathology: methods in molecular biology (methods and protocols). New York: Humana Press; 2014. p. 271–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelstring RJ, Allred DC, Esther RJ, et al. Differential antigen preservation during tissue autolysis. Hum Pathol. 1991;22:237–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prakash S, Banks PM. Technical factors in the preparation and evaluation of lymph node biopsies. In: Orazi A, Knowles DM, Foucar K, Weiss LM, editors. Knowles’ neoplastic hematopathology. Philadelphia: LWW; 2014. p. 286–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grizzle WE, Fredenburgh JL, Myers RB. Fixation of tissues. In: Bancroft JD, Gamble M, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2008. p. 53–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rolls G. Fixation and fixatives – popular fixative solutions. Leica Biosyst. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/pathologyleaders/fixation-and-fixatives-4-popular-fixative-solutions/#c22930/. Accessed Dec 24 2018.

  18. Qidwai K, Afkhami M, Day C. The pathologist’s guide to fixatives. In: Day C, editor. Histopathology: methods in molecular biology (methods and protocols). New York: Humana Press; 2014. p. 21–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Brynes RK. LAC+USC Medical Center, clinical hematology laboratory, procedure manual. Los Angeles; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Babic A, Loftin IR, Stainslaw S, Wang M, Miller R, Warren SM, et al. The impact of pre-analytical processing on staining quality for H&E, dual hapten, dual color in situ hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays. Methods. 2010;52:287–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wood BL, Arroz M, Barnett D, DiGiuseppe J, Greig B, Kussick SJ, Oldaker T, Shenkin M, Stone E, Wallace P. 2006 Bethesda International Consensus recommendations on the immunophenotypic analysis of hematolymphoid neoplasia by flow cytometry: optimal reagents and reporting for the flow cytometric diagnosis of hematopoietic neoplasia. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2007;72(Suppl 1):S14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Craig FE, Foon KA. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms. Blood. 2008;111(8):3941–67.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zeka F, Vanderheyden K, De Smet E, Cuvelier CA, Mestdagh P, Vandesompele J. Straightforward and sensitive RT-qPCR based gene expression analysis of FFPE samples. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21418.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Iddawela M, Rueda OM, Klarqvist M, Graf S, Earl HM, Caldas C. Reliable gene expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue (FFPE) using cDNA-mediated annealing, extension, selection, and ligation whole-genome (DASL WG) assay. BMC Med Genet. 2016;9:54.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lefrançois P, Tetzlaff MT, Moreau L, Watters AK, Netchiporouk E, Provost N, Gilbert M, Ni X, Sasseville D, Duvic M, Litvinov IV. TruSeq-based gene expression analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma samples: subgroup analysis results and elucidation of biases from FFPE sample processing on the TruSeq platform. Front Med. 2017;4:153.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim SJ, Sohn I, Do IG, Jung SH, Ko YH, Yoo HY, Paik S, Kim WS. Gene expression profiles for the prediction of progression-free survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: results of a DASL assay. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(3):437–47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jaffe ES, Arber DA, Campo E, et al. Hematopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Orazi A, Foucar K. Knowles neoplastic hematopathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. His ED. Hematopathology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al. WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Revised 4th ed. Lyon: World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  31. O’Malley DP, George TI, Orazi A, et al. Benign and reactive conditions of the lymph node and spleen. Atlas of nontumor pathology. 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: ARP PRESS; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ioachim HL, Medeiros LJ. Ioachim’s lymph node pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zenggang Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pan, Z., Aye, L., Siddiqi, I.N., Wang, E. (2020). Evaluation of Excised Lymph Nodes. In: Wang, E., Lagoo, A.S. (eds) Practical Lymph Node and Bone Marrow Pathology. Practical Anatomic Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32189-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32189-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32188-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32189-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics