Skip to main content

Fort Eben-Emael: Geographic Pivot of the Western Front, 1940

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Military Geoscience

Part of the book series: Advances in Military Geosciences ((AMG))

Abstract

On 11 May 1940, Fort Eben-Emael, touted to be the strongest fort in the world and lynchpin in the Allied defensive system, fell to a small, highly trained force of German glider troops. The world was shocked by the mysterious and unorthodox attack that caused the fort to surrender after only 28 hours, thus opening a gap in the Allied line through which German panzers advanced: 10 days later the Belgians capitulated, and French forces along the Ardennes and Meuse River collapsed, precipitating the Allied debacle at Dunkirk. Thus, Eben-Emael was perhaps the geographic pivot of the Western Front. Fort Eben-Emael was built during the interwar period and carefully sited on an 80-meter high ridge of hard limestone south of Maastricht to protect key crossing points along the Meuse River. Recognizing the critical nature of this terrain, the Belgian Army constructed the fort to be immensely strong and impregnable – except from the air, a fatal flaw that the highly trained German force exploited. The fall of Eben-Emael was decisive because it opened a lethal gap in the Allied line, and it triggered the collapse of the Western Front. This paper will examine the geography Fort Eben-Emael and the German attack on the fort to demonstrate its importance to the strategic geometry of the Western Front and its significance as a geographic pivot during this decisive campaign.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelsson, G. (1940). Berlin lists gains. New York Times, 12 May 1940, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, R. H. (1972). Military balance. History of the second world war (pp. 334–356). New York: Marshall Cavendish USA, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, J. A. (1948). Past airborne employment. Military Affairs, 12(4), 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan, S. (2005). Fort Eben-Emael: The key to Hitler’s victory in the west. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galgano, F. A. (2008). Sichelschnitt: Geographical analysis of a decisive campaign, France 1940. In P. Nathanail, B. Abrahart, & R. Bradshaw (Eds.), Military geology and geography: History and technology (pp. 185–198). Nottingham: Total Graphics, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Guderian, H. (1957). Panzer leader. New York: Random House, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, A. (1969). To lose a battle, France 1940. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, A. (1972). Breakthrough at Sedan. History of the second world war (pp. 356–372). New York: Marshall Cavendish USA, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2003). The fall of France: The Nazi invasion of 1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. E., & Jurga, R. M. (1999). Fortress Europe. Conshohocken: Combined Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, I. (2006). Fort Eben-Emael. Hersham: Ian Allan Publishing, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Military Intelligence Section (MIS). (1943). Continental Europe strategic maps and tables part I: Western Europe. Washington, D.C.: Army Map Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrazek, J. E. (1970). The fall of Fort Eben-Emael. Washington, D.C.: Robert B. Luce, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (1940). Nazis report use of secret weapon. 13 May 1940, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possony, S. (1944). May 1940: The pattern of bad generalship. Military Affairs, 8(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, T. (2005). Fort Eben-Emael. South Yorkshire: Pen and Sword Books, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Military Academy (USMA). (1995). The west point atlas of war: World War II: European theater. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Defense Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Manstein, E. (1958). Lost victories. Novato: Presidio Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, P. (2004). Glider assault on Eben-Emael as an archetype for the future. Infantry, 93(2), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzig, R. (1973). Coup from the air: The capture of Fort Eben-Emael (pp. 386–397). New York: Marshall Cavendish USA, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis A. Galgano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galgano, F.A. (2020). Fort Eben-Emael: Geographic Pivot of the Western Front, 1940. In: Guth, P. (eds) Military Geoscience. Advances in Military Geosciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32173-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics