Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Representative Bureaucracy and Performance pp 1–21Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Representative Bureaucracy and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 342 Accesses

Part of the book series: Executive Politics and Governance ((EXPOLGOV))

Abstract

The chapter introduces the book’s central themes: representative bureaucracy, the demographic transformation of the South African public service since 1994, and how racial and gender representation influence bureaucratic performance. Affirmative action to promote equity and proportional representation in the public sector is discussed, along with a summary of the main criticisms of affirmative action, including claims about its adverse impact on bureaucratic capacity and performance. Another view is also presented, one based on research suggesting representative bureaucracies are more effective at implementing public policies. The main research questions are then posed: can increased representation of blacks and women in the public service improve organizational performance, and if so, how or why? The methodological approach, data, and main empirical findings are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agocs, C., & Burr, C. (1996). Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity: Assessing the differences. International Journal of Manpower, 17, 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA). (1995). White paper on the transformation of the public service. Pretoria: DPSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPSA. (1998). White paper on affirmative action in the public service. Pretoria: DPSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPSA. (2016). Annual report on employment equity in the public service 2015/2016. Pretoria: DPSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, S., Malatesta, M., & Smith, C. R. (2013). Race, gender, and government contracting: Different explanations or new prospects for theory? Public Administration Review, 73, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, P. E. (2014). The crisis of the South African public service. Journal of the Helen Suzman Foundation, 74, 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gade, D. M., & Wilkins, V. M. (2013). Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, L. H. (2005). Affirmative action in Malaysia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, A. (2013). South Africa’s suspended revolution: Hopes and prospects. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay (pp. 1–33). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Battle, W. S., Keller, C. E., & Lee, R. A. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (1999). Are affirmative action hires less qualified? Evidence from employer-employee data on new hires. Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 534–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (2000). What does affirmative action do? ILR Review, 53, 240–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H., & Neumark, D. (2006). Affirmative action: What do we know? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 463–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, C. (2006). The impact of affirmative action in India: More political than socioeconomic. India Review, 5, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaunch, H. M. (1998). Affirmative action in Namibia: Redressing the imbalances of the past? Windhoek: New Namibia Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, A. (2014). BEE: Helping or hurting? Cape Town: Tafelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. W. (2010). South Africa’s brave new world: The beloved country since the end of apartheid. New York: Overlook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, L. R. (2010). Representative bureaucracy. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy (pp. 1–28). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96, 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellough, J. E. (2006). Understanding affirmative action: Politics, discrimination and the search for justice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, K. (1978). Representative bureaucracy: The Canadian perspective. Canadian Public Administration, 21, 489–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, D., Kobelt, E., & Andrey, S. (2012). Towards a representative bureaucracy: Promoting linguistic representation and diversity in the Swiss and Canadian federal public services. World Political Science Review, 8, 272–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. (2006). Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation. Public Administration Review, 66, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. E. (1952). Bureaucracy and constitutionalism. American Political Science Review, 46, 808–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luiz, J. M. (2002). South African state capacity and post-apartheid economic reconstruction. International Journal of Social Economics, 29, 594–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 3, 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69, 526–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66, 850–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, J., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question. Journal of Politics, 61, 1025–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ncholo, P. (2000). Reforming the public service in South Africa: A policy framework. Public Administration and Development, 20, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndletyana, M. (2008). Affirmative action in the public service. In A. Habib & K. Bentley (Eds.), Racial redress and citizenship in South Africa (pp. 77–98). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paswan, S., & Jaideva, P. (Eds.). (2004). Encyclopedia of dalits in India: Reservation (Vol. 5). Delhi: Kalpaz Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, L. A. (2005). The state of the state: Institutional transformation, capacity and political change in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratuva, S. (2013). Politics of preferential development: Trans-global study of affirmative action and ethnic conflict in Fiji, Malaysia and South Africa. Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 537–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (2007). Shades of difference: Mac Maharaj and the struggle for South Africa. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2017). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, No. 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Communication and Information System. https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996.

  • Schuck, P. H. (2002). Affirmative action: Past, present, and future. Yale Law and Policy Review, 20, 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. C. (2006). A solution in search of a problem? Discrimination, affirmative action, and the new public service. Public Administration Review, 66, 911–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrentny, J. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solidarity. (2013). Stop “race-firmative” action. Johannesburg: Solidarity. http://solidariteit.co.za/en/affirmative-action-campaign/.

  • South African Institute of Race Relations (SOIRR). (1989). Race relations survey 1988/89. Johannesburg: SOIRR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall, R. (2013). Liberation movements in power: Party and state in southern africa. Woodbridge, UK: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, N. A., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2008). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (2009). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tummala, K. K. (2015). Politics of preference: India, United States, and South Africa. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon, L., & Gagnon, A. G. (2013). The politics of representative bureaucracy in multilingual states: A comparison of Belgium, Canada and Switzerland. Regional and Federal Studies, 23, 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S., Groeneveld, S., & Vandenbussche, L. (2013). Representative bureaucracy in Belgium: Power sharing or diversity? In P. Von Maravic, B. G. Peters, & E. Schroter (Eds.), Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia (pp. 69–86). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gool, B., & de Zwart, F. (2013). Politics of representative bureaucracy in India. In P. Von Maravic, B. G. Peters, & E. Schroter (Eds.), Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia (pp. 188–203). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper, P. P. (1958). The history of the U.S. Civil Service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Maravic, P., Peters, B. G., & Schroter, E. (Eds.). (2013). Representative bureaucracy in action: Country profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, Stephanie M. (1996). Privilege revealed: How invisible preference undermines America. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Sergio Fernandez

Authors
  1. Sergio Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernandez, S. (2020). Representative Bureaucracy and Performance. In: Representative Bureaucracy and Performance. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32134-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation