Abstract
A majority of research by personality psychologists examining health has utilized publicly available datasets, for good reason. These resources are often the only available datasets large enough to detect expected effect sizes and may contain biological or genetic data that is difficult to obtain. However, researchers tend to examine only one large dataset at a time. Given recent meta-research on the robustness and replicability of “established” findings, all researchers should take greater care to evaluate the evidentiary value of their findings and seek methods to increase their robustness. Personality and aging psychologists who use publicly available datasets have a unique tool at their disposal in order to achieve this goal, namely, more publicly available datasets. More specifically, psychologists may use coordinated analysis (Hofer and Piccinin, Psychol Methods 14:150–164, 2009; Piccinin and Hofer, Integrative analysis of longitudinal studies on aging: Collaborative research networks, meta-analysis, and optimizing future studies. In: Hofer S, Alwin D (eds) Handbook on cognitive aging: interdisciplinary perspectives. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 446–476, 2008) to examine relationships across several large datasets and, using the tools of meta-analysis, identify generalizable effect sizes and examine heterogeneity across countries and methods. This chapter describes the motivation for coordinated analysis, the process of using this method, and details several examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atherton, O. E., Robins, R. W., Rentfrow, P. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2014). Personality correlates of risky health outcomes: Findings from a large internet study. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 56–60.
Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York, NY: Academic.
Brim, O. G., Baltes, P. B., Bumpass, L. L., Cleary, P. D., Featherman, D. L., Hazzard, W. R., & Shweder, R. (1999). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 1), 1995–1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02760.v12.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1989). NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). In The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. Vol. 2, pp. 179–198). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Crippa, A., Khudyakov, P., Wang, M., Orsini, N., & Spiegelman, D. (2016). A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 35, 3661–3675.
Elliot, A. J., Turiano, N. A., & Chapman, B. P. (2016). Socioeconomic status interacts with conscientiousness and neuroticism to predict circulating concentrations of inflammatory markers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51, 240–250.
Friedman, H. S. (2000). Long-term relations of personality and health: Dynamisms, mechanisms, tropisms. Journal of Personality, 68, 1089–1107.
Friedman, H. S. (2019). Neuroticism and health as individuals age. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 25–32.
Friedman, H. S., Kern, M. L., & Reynolds, C. A. (2010). Personality and health, subjective Well-being, and longevity. Journal of Personality, 78, 179–216.
Gale, C. R., Cukic, I., Batty, G. D., McIntosh, A. M., Weiss, A., & Deary, I. J. (2017). When is high neuroticism protective against death? Findings from UK biobank. Psychological Science, 28, 1345–1357.
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. New York, NY: Department of Statistics, Columbia University.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
Graham, E. K., Weston, S. J., Gerstorf, D., Yoneda, T. B., Booth, T., Beam, C. R., Petkus, A. J., Rutsohn, J. P., Drewelies, J., Hall, A. N. et al. (2019). Trajectories of Big Five personality traits: A coordinated analysis of 16 longitudinal studies. Manuscript under review.
Graham, E. K., Weston, S. J., Turiano, N. A., Aschwanden, D., Booth, T., Harrison, F., James, B. D., Lewis, N. A., Makkar, S. R., Mueller, S. et al. (2019). Is healthy neuroticism associated with health behaviors? A coordinated integrative data analysis. Manuscript under review.
Hagger-Johnson, G., Roberts, B., Boniface, D., Sabia, S., Batty, G. D., Elbaz, A., … Deary, I. J. (2012). Neuroticism and cardiovascular disease mortality: Socioeconomic status modifies the risk in women (UK health and lifestyle survey). Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 596–603.
Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2006). A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 763–779.
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558.
Hill, P. L., Turiano, N. A., Mroczek, D. K., & Burrow, A. L. (2016). The value of a purposeful life: Sense of purpose predicts greater income and net worth. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 38–42.
Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150–164.
Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (2010). Toward an integrative science of life-span development and aging. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 269–278.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California–Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1997). The midlife development inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.
Lalkhen, A. G., & McCluskey, A. (2008). Statistics v: Introduction to clinical trials and systematic reviews. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 8, 143–146.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., … Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0021.
Murray, A. L., & Booth, T. (2015). Personality and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 50–55.
Piccinin, A. M., & Hofer, S. M. (2008). Integrative analysis of longitudinal studies on aging: Collaborative research networks, meta-analysis, and optimizing future studies. In S. Hofer & D. Alwin (Eds.), Handbook on cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 446–476). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Piccinin, A. M., Muniz-Terrera, G., Clouston, S., Reynolds, C. A., Thorvaldsson, V., Deary, I. J., et al. (2013). Coordinated analysis of age, sex, and education effects on change in MMSE scores. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 374–390.
Shipley, B. A., Weiss, A., Der, G., Taylor, M. D., & Deary, I. J. (2007). Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK health and lifestyle survey: A 21-year prospective cohort study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 923–931.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
Stephan, Y., Sutin, A. R., Canada, B., & Terracciano, A. (2017). Personality and frailty: Evidence from four samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 46–53.
Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., et al. (2015). UK biobank: An open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Medicine, 12(3), e1001779.
Turiano, N. A., Chapman, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mroczek, D. K. (2015). Personality and the leading behavioral contributors of mortality. Health Psychology, 34(1), 51.
Turiano, N. A., Graham, E. K., Weston, S. J., Booth, T., Harrison, F., James, B. D., Lewis, N. A., Makkar, S., Mueller, S., Wisniewski, K. M. et al. (2019). Is healthy neuroticism associated with longevity? A coordinated integrative data analysis. Manuscript under review.
Turiano, N. A., Mroczek, D. K., Moynihan, J., & Chapman, B. P. (2013). Big 5 personality traits and interleukin-6: Evidence for “healthy neuroticism” in a us population sample. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 28, 83–89.
Turiano, N. A., Whiteman, S. D., Hampson, S. E., Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D. K. (2012). Personality and substance use in midlife: Conscientiousness as a moderator and the effects of trait change. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 295–305.
Vartanian, T. P. (2010). Secondary data analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2002). Who takes health risks? A probe into eight personality types. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185–1197.
Weston, S. J., Graham, E. K., Turiano, N. A., Aschwanden, D., Booth, T., Harrison, F., James, B. D., Lewis, N. A., Makkar, S., Mueller, S. et al. (2019). Is healthy neuroticism associated with chronic conditions? A coordinated integrative data analysis. Manuscript under review.
Weston, S. J., Hill, P. L., Edmonds, G. W., Mroczek, D. K., & Hampson, S. E. (2018). No evidence of “healthy neuroticism” in the Hawaii personality and health cohort. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 426–441.
Weston, S. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2015). Identification of the healthy neurotic: Personality traits predict smoking after disease onset. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 61–69.
Weston, S. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2016). How do people respond to health news? The role of personality traits. Psychology & Health, 31, 1–18.
Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of pre-existing datasets. Advanced Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214–227.
Yarkoni, T., & Westfall, J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weston, S.J., Graham, E.K., Piccinin, A.M. (2020). Coordinated Data Analysis: A New Method for the Study of Personality and Health. In: Hill, P.L., Allemand, M. (eds) Personality and Healthy Aging in Adulthood. International Perspectives on Aging, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32052-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32053-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)