Skip to main content

Comparative Study of Dermoscopic Hair Removal Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
VipIMAGE 2019 (VipIMAGE 2019)

Abstract

When analyzing dermoscopic images, the hairs and their shadows on the skin may occlude relevant information about the lesion at the time of diagnosis. As far as we know, there is no method that quantitatively evaluates the performance of hair removal algorithms. In this work, we present a hair removal benchmark of six state-of-the-art algorithms, each with a different approach to segment and inpaint the hair pixels. To evaluate the algorithms, 13 dermoscopic images without hair were selected from the PH2 database. Next, two different hair simulators, providing hairs with a wide range of characteristics, are applied to these images. The results obtained with the hair removal algorithms on the simulated hair samples can be contrasted with the reference hairless images. To quantitatively assess their efficacy, we use a series of performance measures that evaluate the similarity between the original hairless image and the one obtained by each of the algorithms. Also, a statistical test is used to check the superiority of a method with respect to the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Cancer Information System. https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php. Accessed 19 Nov 2018

  2. Melanoma Molecular Map Project. http://www.mmmp.org/MMMP/welcome.mmmp. Accessed 28 Feb 2019

  3. World Cancer Research Fund International. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/worldwide-cancer-data. Accessed 1 Jan 2019

  4. Abbas, Q., Celebi, M.E., García, I.F.: Hair removal methods: a comparative study for dermoscopy images. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 6(4), 395–404 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Attia, M., Hossny, M., Zhou, H., Yazdabadi, A., Asadi, H., Nahavandi, S.: Realistic hair simulator for skin lesion images using conditional generative adversarial network. Preprints (2018). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201810.0756.v1

  6. Barnston, A.G.: Correspondence among the correlation, RMSE, and Heidke forecast verification measures; refinement of the Heidke score. Weather Forecast. 7(4), 699–709 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bibiloni, P., González-Hidalgo, M., Massanet, S.: Skin hair removal in dermoscopic images using soft color morphology. In: Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, pp. 322–326. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Battisti, F., Carli, M.: New full-reference quality metrics based on HVS. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics, vol. 4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, A., Kwan, S.Y., Chang, W.Y., Liu, M.Y., Chi, M.H., Chen, G.S.: A robust hair segmentation and removal approach for clinical images of skin lesions. In: 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3315–3318. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, T., Ng, V., Gallagher, R., Coldman, A., McLean, D.: Dullrazor®: a software approach to hair removal from images. Comput. Biol. Med. 27(6), 533–543 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer, J., et al.: Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma. Med. J. Aust. 167(4), 206–210 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mendonca, T., Celebi, M., Mendonca, T., Marques, J.: PH2: a public database for the analysis of dermoscopic images. Dermoscopy Image Analysis (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mirzaalian, H.: Hair Sim Software. http://www2.cs.sfu.ca/~hamarneh/software/hairsim/Welcome.html. Accessed 7 Mar 2019

  14. Mirzaalian, H., Lee, T.K., Hamarneh, G.: Hair enhancement in dermoscopic images using dual-channel quaternion tubularness filters and MRF-based multilabel optimization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(12), 5486–5496 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenfeld, A., De La Torre, P.: Histogram concavity analysis as an AID in threshold selection. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 2, 231–235 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: Image information and visual quality. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, pp. iii–709. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Toossi, M.T.B., Pourreza, H.R., Zare, H., Sigari, M.H., Layegh, P., Azimi, A.: An effective hair removal algorithm for dermoscopy images. Skin Res. Technol. 19(3), 230–235 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9(3), 81–84 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26(1), 98–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., et al.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, vol. 2, pp. 1398–1402. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization: How common is skin cancer?. https://www.who.int/uv/faq/skincancer/en/index1.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2019

  23. Xie, F.Y., Qin, S.Y., Jiang, Z.G., Meng, R.S.: PDE-based unsupervised repair of hair-occluded information in dermoscopy images of melanoma. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 33(4), 275–282 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported by the project TIN 2016-75404-P AEI/FEDER, UE. L. Talavera-Martínez also benefited from the fellowship BES-2017-081264 conceded by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness under a program co-financed by the European Social Fund. We thank Dr. Mohamed Attia from the Institute For Innovation and Research, Deakin University, Australia, for providing the GAN-based simulated hair images.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidia Talavera-Martínez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Talavera-Martínez, L., Bibiloni, P., González-Hidalgo, M. (2019). Comparative Study of Dermoscopic Hair Removal Methods. In: Tavares, J., Natal Jorge, R. (eds) VipIMAGE 2019. VipIMAGE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32040-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics