Abstract
The local governments planning is the main tool to met the citizen needs. One of the components of this tool should include the outlines to take advantage of technology. But the people responsible to plan need specific metrics to measure how they are using the technology. This paper purpose an study of the relevance of the global indicators related to Cities with the best conditions to live or visit. We compared a set of models and the data of some indicators about Latin America cities and top cities around the world.
This research have analyzed a set of models provided by academy, industry and government and using a method deductive summarize the relevant indicators for Latinoamerica. We plan evaluate global models with a set of real dataset of some cities in order to create a model of indicators relevant to Latin America cities.
Supported by Universidad Tecnoógica Israel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AENOR: Las normas para las ciudades inteligentes. Standard, Agencia Española de Normalizació, Espaa, Madrid (2015)
Afonso, R.A., dos Santos Brito, K., do Nascimento, C.H., Garcia, V.C., Álvaro, A.: Brazilian smart cities: using a maturity model to measure and compare inequality in cities. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, dg.o 2015, pp. 230–238. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2757401.2757426, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2757401.2757426
Al-Nasrawi, S., Adams, C., El-Zaart, A.: A conceptual multidimensional model for assessing smart sustainable cities. JISTEM-J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 12(3), 541–558 (2015)
Alkandari, A., Alnasheet, M., Alshekhly, I.F.T.: Smart cities: survey. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Technol. Res. 2, 79–90 (2012)
Benamrou, B., Mohamed, B., Bernoussi, A.S., Mustapha, O.: Ranking models of smart cities. In: 2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt). pp. 872–879. IEEE (2016)
Berrone, P., Ricart, J.E., Carraso, C., Ricart, R.: IESE cities in motion index 2016 (2016). Retrieved 1, 2017
Bosch, P., Jongeneel, S., Rovers, V., Neumann, H., Airaksinen, M., Huovila, A.: CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities. CITYkeys report (2017)
Bruni, E., Panza, A., Sarto, L., Khayatian, F., et al.: Evaluation of cities smartness by means of indicators for small and medium cities and communities: a methodology for northern italy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 34, 193–202 (2017)
Cohen, B.: Smart city wheel. Retrieved from Smart & Safe City (2013). http://www.smartcircle.org/smartcity/blog/boyd-cohen-the-smart-city-wheel
Commission, E.: Smart cities (1999). http://web.archive.org/web/20080207010024/, http://www.808multimedia.com/winnt/kernel.htm
Dameri, R.P.: Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. Int. J. Comput. Technol. 11(5), 2544–2551 (2013)
Dameri, R.P.: The conceptual idea of smart city: University, industry, and government vision. In: Smart City Implementation, pp. 23–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)
Giffinger, R., Gudrun, H.: Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: Architect. City Environ. 4(12), 7–26 (2010)
ISO: Sustainable development of communities – indicators for city services and quality of life. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, May 2014
Smiciklas, J., Gundula Prokop, P.S.Z.S.: Collection Methodology for key Performance Indicators for Smart Sustainable Cities. Naciones Unidas, Nueva York: (2017)
Khatoun, R., Zeadally, S.: Smart cities: concepts, architectures, research opportunities. Commun. ACM 59(8), 46–57 (2016)
Lee, J.H., Hancock, M.G., Hu, M.C.: Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from seoul and san francisco. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89, 80–99 (2014)
Nations, O.U.: World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. Naciones Unidas, Nueva York (2017)
Paolo, N., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C, Mangano, G., Scorrano, F.: Current trends in smart city initiatives: some stylised facts. Cities (2013). www.elsevier.com/locate/cities
Penã, S., Osvaldo, O.: Smart city: Diagnóstico de la ciudad de guayaquil (ecuador) (2018)
Prochazkova, D., Prochazka, J.: Safety of smart cities. Int. J. 15(8), 6979–6985 (2014)
de Santana, E.D.S., de Oliveira Nunes, É., Passos, D.C., Santos, L.B.: SMM: a maturity model of smart cities based on sustainability indicators of the ISO 37122. Retrieved from Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci., 7 (2019)
Song, H., Srinivasan, R., Sookoor, T., Jeschke, S.: Smart Cities: Foundations, Principles, and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carrión, J., Coba, P., Pérez, M. (2020). An Evaluation of the Relevance of Global Models of Indicators for Latin American Cities. In: Botto-Tobar, M., León-Acurio, J., Díaz Cadena, A., Montiel Díaz, P. (eds) Advances in Emerging Trends and Technologies. ICAETT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1066. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32022-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32022-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32021-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32022-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)