Skip to main content

Prediction of Drug Potency and Latent Relation Analysis in Precision Cancer Treatment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 349 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1061 ))

Abstract

As cancer treatments are gaining momentum, in a bid to improve drug potency, doctors are looking towards precision cancer medicine. Here the drug prescriptions are tailored to the patients gene changes. In this paper, the aim is to automate the task of drug selection, by predicting the clinical outcome of using a particular drug on a combination of the patients gene, variant and cancer disease type. While the main idea behind precision cancer treatment is to identify drugs suitable to each patients unique case, it is justifiable for to assume that there exists a predictive pattern in these prescriptions. We propose to implement this prediction using three machine learning models, the Support Vector Machine, the Random Forest Classifier and the Deep Neural Network. The models yielded promising results of over 90% accuracy and over 95% ROC-AUC score. This positive outcome affirms the assumption that there exists a predictive pattern in precision treatments, that could be extrapolated to help automate such tasks. We further analyzed the data set and identified latent relations between drug, cancer disease, target gene and gene variant. This exploration uncovered some significant patterns where it can be observed how a particular drug has had successful results in treating a particular cancer and targeting specific gene variants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019(69), 7–34 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The Personalized Medicine Report 2017: Opportunity, Challenges and the Future. Personalized Medicine Coalition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashley, E.A.: The precision medicine initiative: a new national effort. JAMA 313(21), 2119–2120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richard, W.: Inheritance and Drug Response. N Engl. J. Med. 348, 529–537 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra020021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalow, W.: Pharmacogenetics: Heredity and the Response to Drugs. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Price Evans, D.A.: Genetic Factors in Drug Therapy: Clinical and Molecular Pharmacogenetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weber, W.W.: Pharmacogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman, A.A., Letai, A., Fisher, D.E., Flaherty, K.T.: Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics. Nature Rev. Cancer 15(12), 747–756 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, M.Q., Chen, L., Cooper, G.F., Young, J.D., Lu, X.: Precision oncology beyond targeted therapy: combining omics data with machine learning matches the majority of cancer cells to effective therapeutics. Mol. Cancer Res. 16(2), 269–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daemen, A., et al.: Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer. Genome Biol. 14, R110 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stallkamp, J., Schlipsing, M., Salmen, J., Igel, C.: Man vs. computer: benchmarking machine learning algorithms for traffic sign recognition. Neural Networks 32, 323–332 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith, M., et al.: CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer. Nat. Genet. 49, 170–174 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rindflesch, T.C., et al.: EDGAR: extraction of drugs, genes and relations from the biomedical literature. Biocomputing 2000, 517–528 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman, P.B., et al.: Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. Natl. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2507–2516 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Letai, A.: Functional precision cancer medicine–moving beyond pure genomics. Nature Med. 23, 1028 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jai Kotia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kotia, J., Bharti, R., Kotwal, A. (2020). Prediction of Drug Potency and Latent Relation Analysis in Precision Cancer Treatment. In: Gruca, A., Czachórski, T., Deorowicz, S., Harężlak, K., Piotrowska, A. (eds) Man-Machine Interactions 6. ICMMI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1061 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31964-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics