Abstract
We compared clinical and weight bearing (WB) cone beam CT (CBCT) assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA) in patients with adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). Twelve men and eight women (mean age, 52.2) with flexible AAFD were included. Subjects underwent WB CBCT and clinical assessment of HA. The mean of clinically measured hindfoot valgus was 15.2°. It was significantly different from the mean values of all WB CBCT measurements. Using WB CBCT can help characterize the valgus HA in patients with AAFD. We found the different CT measurements to be reliable and repeatable and to significantly differ from the clinical evaluation.
Based on de Cesar Netto C, Shakoor D, Roberts L, Chinanuvathana A, Mousavian A, Lintz F, Schon LC, Demehri S, Weightbearing CT International Study Group. Hindfoot Alignment of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: A Comparison of Clinical Assessment and Weightbearing Cone Beam CT Examinations. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Nov 5. pii: S1268-7731(18)30301-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.10.008. [Epub ahead of print]
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsChange history
31 March 2020
This book was inadvertently published with the wrong chapter author details in pdf and ePub version.
References
de Cesar Netto C, Shakoor D, Roberts L, Chinanuvathana A, Mousavian A, Lintz F, Schon LC, Demehri S, Weight Bearing CTISG. Hindfoot alignment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A comparison of clinical assessment and weightbearing cone beam CT examinations. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. pii: S1268-7731(18)30301-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.10.008. [Epub ahead of print].
Greisberg J, Hansen ST, Sangeorzan B. Deformity and degeneration in the hindfoot and midfoot joints of the adult acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:530–4.
Giza E, Cush G, Schon LC. The flexible flatfoot in the adult. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12:251–71, vi.
Vulcano E, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Approach and treatment of the adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6:294–303.
Cody EA, Williamson ER, Burket JC, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Correlation of talar anatomy and subtalar joint alignment on weightbearing computed tomography with radiographic flatfoot parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):874–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716646629.
Ozan F, Doğar F, Gençer K, Koyuncu Ş, Vatansever F, Duygulu F, Altay T. Symptomatic flexible flatfoot in adults: subtalar arthroereisis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1597.
Buck FM, Hoffmann A, Mamisch-Saupe N, Espinosa N, Resnick D, Hodler J. Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:578–82.
Haight HJ, Dahm DL, Smith J, Krause DA. Measuring standing hindfoot alignment: reliability of goniometric and visual measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:571–5.
Coughlin MJ, Kaz A. Correlation of Harris mats, physical exam, pictures, and radiographic measurements in adult flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:604–12.
Menz H. Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature. Foot. 1995;5:57–64.
Hirschmann A, Pfirrmann CW, Klammer G, Espinosa N, Buck FM. Upright cone CT of the hindfoot: comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:553–8.
Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:572–6.
Johnson JE, Lamdan R, Granberry WF, Harris GF, Carrera GF. Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:818–25.
Reilingh ML, Beimers L, Tuijthof GJ, Stufkens SA, Maas M, van Dijk CN. Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view. Skelet Radiol. 2010;39:1103–8.
Burssens A, Peeters J, Buedts K, Victor J, Vandeputte G. Measuring hindfoot alignment in weight bearing CT: a novel clinical relevant measurement method. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22:233–8.
Seltzer SE, Weissman BN, Braunstein EM, Adams DF, Thomas WH. Computed tomography of the hindfoot. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:488–97.
Van Bergeyk AB, Younger A, Carson B. CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:37–42.
Kido M, Ikoma K, Imai K, Tokunaga D, Inoue N, Kubo T. Load response of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study. Clin Biomech. 2013;28:568–73.
Haleem AM, Pavlov H, Bogner E, Sofka C, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Comparison of deformity with respect to the talus in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction and controls using multiplanar weight-bearing imaging or conventional radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e63.
Tuominen EK, Kankare J, Koskinen SK, Mattila KT. Weight-bearing CT imaging of the lower extremity. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:146–8.
Thawait GK, Demehri S, AlMuhit A, Zbijweski W, Yorkston J, Del Grande F, Zikria B, Carrino JA, Siewerdsen JH. Extremity cone-beam CT for evaluation of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis: initial experience in imaging of the weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2564–70.
de Cesar Netto C, Schon LC, Thawait GK, da Fonseca LF, Chinanuvathana A, Zbijewski WB, Siewerdsen JH, Demehri S. Flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity: comparison between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurements using cone-beam computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(18):e98. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01366.
de Cesar Netto C, Kunas GC, Soukup D, Marinescu A, Ellis SJ. Correlation of clinical evaluation and radiographic hindfoot alignment in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(7):771–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718762113.
Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W, Thawait GK, Stayman JW, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Foos DH, Yorkston J. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology. 2013;270:816–24.
Demehri S, Muhit A, Zbijewski W, Stayman J, Yorkston J, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Foos D, Thawait G. Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1742–51.
Williamson ER, Chan JY, Burket JC, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. New radiographic parameter assessing hindfoot alignment in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:417–23.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Bluman EM, Myerson MS. Stage IV posterior tibial tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12:341–62, viii.
Johnson KA. Tibialis posterior tendon rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;177:140–7.
Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;239:196–206.
Myerson MS. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393–405.
Grumbine NA, Santoro JP. The tendo Achillis as it relates to rearfoot position. A new classification for evaluation of calcaneal stance position. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1990;7:203–16.
Keenan AM, Bach TM. Clinicians’ assessment of the hindfoot: a study of reliability. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:451–60.
Lamm BM, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Hillstrom HJ. Static rearfoot alignment: a comparison of clinical and radiographic measures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:26–33.
Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12:10–5.
Slullitel G, Álvarez V, Lopez V, Calvi JP, Calvo AB. How accurate is clinical evaluation in hindfoot coronal alignment? Foot Ankle Orthopaedics. 2017;2(4) https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417731563.
Conti MS, Ellis SJ, Chan JY, Do HT, Deland JT. Optimal position of the heel following reconstruction of the stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:919–27.
Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, John S, Child B, Lamm BM. Long leg calcaneal axial and hindfoot alignment radiographic views for frontal plane assessment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:75–8.
Arangio G, Rogman A, Reed JF 3rd. Hindfoot alignment valgus moment arm increases in adult flatfoot with Achilles tendon contracture. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:1078–82.
Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Espinosa N, Buck FM. Three-dimensional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs: comparison with standard radiographic measurements. Skelet Radiol. 2013;42:493–8.
Tuijthof GJ, Herder JL, Scholten PE, van Dijk CN, Pistecky PV. Measuring alignment of the hindfoot. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:357–62.
Willauer P, Sangeorzan BJ, Whittaker EC, Shofer JB, Ledoux WR. The sensitivity of standard radiographic foot measures to misalignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:1334–40.
Baverel L, Brilhault J, Odri G, Boissard M, Lintz F. Influence of lower limb rotation on hindfoot alignment using a conventional two-dimensional radiographic technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;23:44–9.
Saltzman CL, Brandser EA, Berbaum KS, DeGnore L, Holmes JR, Katcherian DA, Teasdall RD, Alexander IJ. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:661–5.
Barg A, Bailey T, Richter M, Netto C, Lintz F, Burssens A, Phisitkul P, Hanrahan CJ, Saltzman CL. Weightbearing computed tomography of the foot and ankle: emerging technology topical review. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;39(3):376–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717740330.
Richter M, Lintz F, Zech S, Meissner SA. Combination of PedCAT weightbearing CT with pedography assessment of the relationship between anatomy-based foot center and force/pressure-based center of gravity. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;39(3):361–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717744206.
Richter M, Seidl B, Zech S, Hahn S. PedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:201–7.
Lintz F, Welck M, Bernasconi A, Thornton J, Cullen NP, Singh D, Goldberg A. 3D biometrics for hindfoot alignment using weightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:684–9.
Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W, Thawait GK, Stayman JW, Packard N, Senn R, Yang D, Foos DH, Yorkston J, Siewerdsen JH. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology. 2014;270:816–24.
Tuominen EK, Kankare J, Koskinen SK, Mattila KT. Weight-bearing CT imaging of the lower extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:146–8.
Chan JY, Williams BR, Nair P, Young E, Sofka C, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. The contribution of medializing calcaneal osteotomy on hindfoot alignment in the reconstruction of the stage II adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:159–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Cesar Netto, C. (2020). Hindfoot Alignment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: A Comparison of Clinical Assessment and Weight Bearing Cone Beam CT Examinations. In: Weight Bearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (WBCT) in the Foot and Ankle. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31949-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31949-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31948-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31949-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)