Skip to main content

Is Load Application Necessary when Using Computed Tomography Scans to Diagnose Syndesmotic Injuries? A Cadaver Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Weight Bearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (WBCT) in the Foot and Ankle
  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

This cadaver study determines the impact of loading on the assessment of incomplete and more complete syndesmotic injuries when using weight bearing computed tomography (CT) scans. Fourteen paired male cadavers (tibial plateau to toe-tip) were included. Eight different measurements were performed to assess the integrity of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis on axial CT scans. In a cadaver model, load application had no effect on the assessment of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in incomplete and more complete syndesmotic injuries. Only more complete injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis could be identified using axial CT images.

Based on Krähenbühl N, Bailey TL, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, Hintermann B, Presson AP, Allen CM, Henninger HB, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Is load application necessary when using computed tomography scans to diagnose syndesmotic injuries? A cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg, 2019 Feb 18 [epub ahead of print]; and Krähenbühl N, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, Mills MK, Hintermann B, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiol, 2018; 47(5): 631–48

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 31 March 2020

    This book was inadvertently published with the wrong chapter author details in pdf and ePub version.

References

  1. Krähenbühl N, Bailey TL, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, Hintermann B, Presson AP, Allen CM, Henninger HB, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Is load application necessary when using computed tomography scans to diagnose syndesmotic injuries? A cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019. Feb 18, epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rammelt S, Obruba P. An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(6):601–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krähenbühl N, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, Mills MK, Hintermann B, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Skelet Radiol. 2018;47(5):631–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt KJ, Goeb Y, Behn AW, Criswell B, Chou L. Ankle joint contact loads and displacement with progressive syndesmotic injury. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(9):1095–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. LaMothe J, Baxter JR, Gilbert S, Murphy CI, Karnovsky SC, Drakos MC. Effect of complete syndesmotic disruption and deltoid injuries and different reduction methods on ankle joint contact mechanics. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(6):694–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Golano P, Vega J, de Leeuw PA, Malagelada F, Manzanares MC, Gotzens V, van Dijk CN. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(5):557–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong MS, Choi YS, Kim YJ, Kim JS, Young KW, Jung YY. Deltoid ligament in acute ankle injury: MR imaging analysis. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(5):655–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feller R, Borenstein T, Fantry AJ, Kellum RB, Machan JT, Nickisch F, Blankenhorn B. Arthroscopic quantification of syndesmotic instability in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):436–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoennagel BP, Karul M, Avanesov M, Bannas P, Gold G, Grossterlinden LG, Rupprecht M, Adam G, Yamamura J. Isolated syndesmotic injury in acute ankle trauma: comparison of plain film radiography with 3T MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(10):1856–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermans JJ, Wentink N, Beumer A, Hop WC, Heijboer MP, Moonen AF, Ginai AZ. Correlation between radiological assessment of acute ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury on MRI. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41(7):787–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krähenbühl N, Weinberg MW, Hintermann B, Haller JM, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Surgical outcome in chronic syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:216–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barg A, Bailey T, Richter M, de Cesar Netto C, Lintz F, Burssens A, Phisitkul P, Hanrahan CJ, Saltzman CL. Weightbearing computed tomography of the foot and ankle: emerging technology topical review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(3):376–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lintz F, de Cesar Netto C, Barg A, Burssens A, Richter M, Weight Bearing CTISG. Weight-bearing cone beam CT scans in the foot and ankle. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(5):278–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter M, Seidl B, Zech S, Hahn S. PedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20(3):201–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shakoor D, Osgood GM, Brehler M, Zbijewski WB, de Cesar Netto C, Shafiq B, Orapin J, Thawait GK, Shon LC, Demehri S. Cone-beam CT measurements of distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis in asymptomatic uninjured ankles: does weight-bearing matter? Skelet Radiol. 2019;48(4):583–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Malhotra K, Welck M, Cullen N, Singh D, Goldberg AJ. The effects of weight bearing on the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a study comparing weight bearing-CT with conventional CT. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018. epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barg A, Amendola RL, Henninger HB, Kapron AL, Saltzman CL, Anderson AE. Influence of ankle position and radiographic projection angle on measurement of supramalleolar alignment on the anteroposterior and hindfoot alignment views. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(11):1352–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nault ML, Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme GY, Leduc S. CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(11):638–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):433–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malhotra G, Cameron J, Toolan BC. Diagnosing chronic diastasis of the syndesmosis: a novel measurement using computed tomography. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(5):483–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeung TW, Chan CY, Chan WC, Yeung YN, Yuen MK. Can pre-operative axial CT imaging predict syndesmosis instability in patients sustaining ankle fractures? Seven years’ experience in a tertiary trauma center. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(6):823–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nault ML, Marien M, Hebert-Davies J, Laflamme GY, Pelsser V, Rouleau DM, Gosselin-Papadopoulos N, Leduc S. MRI quantification of the impact of ankle position on syndesmosis anatomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(2):215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pneumaticos SG, Noble PC, Chatziioannou SN, Trevino SG. The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(2):107–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, O’Doherty D. Malreduction of syndesmosis–are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury. 2011;42(10):1073–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cherney SM, Spraggs-Hughes AG, McAndrew CM, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ. Incisura morphology as a risk factor for syndesmotic malreduction. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(7):748–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lilyquist M, Shaw A, Latz K, Bogener J, Wentz B. Cadaveric analysis of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):882–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elgafy H, Semaan HB, Blessinger B, Wassef A, Ebraheim NA. Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Skelet Radiol. 2010;39(6):559–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Burssens A, Vermue H, Barg A, Krahenbuhl N, Victor J, Buedts K. Templating of syndesmotic ankle lesions by use of 3D analysis in weightbearing and nonweightbearing CT. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(12):1487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexej Barg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barg, A. (2020). Is Load Application Necessary when Using Computed Tomography Scans to Diagnose Syndesmotic Injuries? A Cadaver Study. In: Weight Bearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (WBCT) in the Foot and Ankle. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31949-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31949-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31948-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31949-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics