Abstract
We develop a process framework to study causality between n labs that respect any general probabilistic theory. The transition from 2 to 3 labs turned out to be tricky and the concept of dynamical causal order was introduced. We focus on the quantum case and develop a number of new concepts for processes with various interesting properties regarding causality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the Chap. 6 following the relevant paper [25] we refer to these sets as non-signaling sets, because by definition the parties in this set cannot signal to each other. However, the consecutive sets are defined by asking the question ‘who is first’, whereas the nonsignaling sets are defined by the question ‘who is last’. This implies that in a given situation, the consecutive sets and the non-signaling sets will not coincide—although they will both contain sets of parties that are causally independent.
References
Oreshkov O, Giarmatzi C (2016) New J Phys 18:093020
Oreshkov O, Costa F, Brukner Č (2012) Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nat Commun 3:1092
Hardy L (2005) Probability theories with dynamic causal structure: a new framework for quantum gravity. arXiv:0509120
Hardy L (2007) Quantum gravity computers: on the theory of computation with indefinite causal structure. arXiv:quant-ph/0701019
Chiribella G, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P, Valiron, B (2013) Beyond causally ordered quantum computers. Phys Rev A 88, 022318. arXiv:0912.0195 (2009)
Colnaghi T, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P, Facchini S (2012) Quantum computation with programmable connections between gates. Phys Lett A 376:2940–2943
Chiribella G (2012) Perfect discrimination of no-signalling channels via quantum superposition of causal structures. Phys Rev A 86:040301
Baumeler Ä, Wolf S (2014) Perfect signaling among three parties violating predefined causal order. Proc Int Symp Inf Theory (ISIT) 2014:526–530
Nakago K, Hajdušek M, Nakayama S, Murao M (2015) Parallelized adiabatic gate teleportation. Phys Rev A 92:062316
Baumeler Ä, Feix A, Wolf S (2014) Maximal incompatibility of locally classical behavior and global causal order in multi-party scenarios. Phys Rev A 90:042106
Araújo M, Costa F, Brukner Č (2014) Computational advantage of quantum-controlled ordering of gates. Phys Rev Lett 113:250402
Brukner Č (2014) Quantum causality. Nat Phys 10(4):259–263
Morimae T (2014) Acausal measurement-based quantum computing. Phys Rev A 90:010101(R)
Ibnouhsein I, Grinbaum A (2015) Information-theoretic constraints on correlations with indefinite causal order. Phys Rev A 92:042124
Brukner Č (2015) Bounding quantum correlations with indefinite causal order. New J Phys 17:073020
Oreshkov O, Cerf NJ (2016) Operational quantum theory without predefined time. New J Phys 18:073037. http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/18/i=7/a=073037
Oreshkov O, Cerf NJ (2015) Operational formulation of time reversal in quantum theory. Nat Phys 11:853–858
Procopio LM et al (2015) Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates. Nat Commun 6:7913. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8913
Rubino G et al (2016) Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order. Sci Adv 2. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/3/e1602589.abstract
Lee CM, Barrett J (2015) Computation in generalised probabilistic theories. New J Phys 17:083001. http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/17/i=8/a=083001
Araújo M, Branciard C, Costa F, Feix A, Giarmatzi C, Brukner Č (2015) Witnessing causal nonseparability. New J Phys 17:102001
Baumeler Ä, Wolf S (2016) The space of logically consistent classical processes without causal order. New J Phys 18:013036. http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/18/i=1/a=013036
Branciard C, Araújo M, Feix A, Costa F, Brukner Č (2016) The simplest causal inequalities and their violation. New J Phys 18:013008
Abbott AA, Giarmatzi C, Costa F, Branciard C (2016) Multipartite causal correlations: polytopes and inequalities. Phys Rev A 94:032131
Giarmatzi C, Costa F (2018) A quantum causal discovery algorithm. npj Quantum Inf 4:17
Portmann C, Matt C, Maurer U, Renner R, Tackmann B (2017) Causal boxes: quantum information-processing systems closed under composition. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 63(5):3277–3305. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7867830&isnumber=7905784
Branciard C (2016) Witnesses of causal nonseparability: an introduction and a few case studies. Sci Rep 6:26018
Pearl J (2009) Causality: models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press
Hardy L (2009) Operational structures as a foundation for probabilistic theories, PIRSA:09060015, Talk at http://pirsa.org/09060015/
Chiribella G, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P (2010) Probabilistic theories with purification. Phys Rev A 81:062348
Chiribella G, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P (2011) Informational derivation of quantum theory. Phys Rev A 84:012311
Hardy L (2011) Reformulating and reconstructing quantum theory. arXiv:1104.2066
Jamiołkowski A (1972) Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators. Rep Math Phys 3(4):275–278
Choi M-D (1975) Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices. Lin Alg Appl 10:285–290
Barnum H, Fuchs CA, Renes JM, Wilce A (2005) Influence-free states on compound quantum systems. arXiv:quant-ph/0507108
Eddington A (1928) The nature of the physical world. Cambridge University Press
Davies E, Lewis J (1970) An operational approach to quantum probability. Comm Math Phys 17:239–260
Kraus K (1983) States, effects and operations. Springer, Berlin
Chiribella G, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P (2009) Theoretical framework for quantum networks. Phys Rev A 80:022339
Bennett CH, Brassard G, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters WK (1993) Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett 70:1895
Feix A, Araújo M, Brukner Č (2016) Causally nonseparable processes admitting a causal model. New J Phys 18: 083040. http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/18/8/083040/
Bell JS (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics 1(3):195–200
Werner RF (1989) Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys Rev A 40:4277
Knill E (1996) Conventions for quantum pseudocode, LANL report LAUR-96-2724
Valiron B, Selinger P (2005) A lambda calculus for quantum computation with classical control. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on typed lambda calculi and applications (TLCA), vol 3461. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 354–368. Springer
Chiribella G, D’Ariano GM, Perinotti P (2008) Transforming quantum operations: quantum supermaps. Europhys Lett 83:30004
Ried K, Agnew M, Vermeyden L, Janzing D, Spekkens RW, Resch KJ (2015) A quantum advantage for inferring causal structure. Nat Phys 11:414–420
Araújo M, Feix A, Navascués M, Brukner Č (2017) A purification postulate for quantum mechanics with indefinite causal order. Quantum 1:10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giarmatzi, C. (2019). Causal and Causally Separable Processes. In: Rethinking Causality in Quantum Mechanics. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31930-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31930-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31929-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31930-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)