Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Predicting Fluid Intelligence of Adolescent Brain from T1-Weighted MRIs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Neurocognitive Prediction (ABCD-NP 2019)

Abstract

Fluid intelligence (Gf) has been defined as the ability to reason and solve previously unseen problems. Links to Gf have been found in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences such as functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. As part of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Neurocognitive Prediction Challenge 2019, we sought to predict Gf in children aged 9–10 from T1-weighted (T1 W) MRIs. The data included atlas–aligned volumetric T1 W images, atlas–defined segmented regions, age, and sex for 3739 subjects used for training and internal validation and 415 subjects used for external validation. We trained sex-specific convolutional neural net (CNN) and random forest models to predict Gf. For the convolutional model, skull-stripped volumetric T1 W images aligned to the SRI24 brain atlas were used for training. Volumes of segmented atlas regions along with each subject’s age were used to train the random forest regressor models. Performance was measured using the mean squared error (MSE) of the predictions. Random forest models achieved lower MSEs than CNNs. Further, the external validation data had a better MSE for females than males (60.68 vs. 80.74), with a combined MSE of 70.83. Our results suggest that predictive models of Gf from volumetric T1 W MRI features alone may perform better when trained separately on male and female data. However, the performance of our models indicates that more information is necessary beyond the available data to make accurate predictions of Gf.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Merrifield, P.R., Cattell, R.B.: Abilities: their structure, growth, and action (1975). https://doi.org/10.2307/1162752

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colom, R., et al.: Gray matter correlates of fluid, crystallized, and spatial intelligence: testing the P-FIT model (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A.: Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akshoomoff, N., et al.: VIII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (Cb): Composite Scores of Crystallized, Fluid, and Overall Cognition (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horn, J.L., Cattell, R.B.: Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence (1967). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90011-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kievit, R.A., Davis, S.W., Griffiths, J., Correia, M.M., Cam-Can, Henson, R.N.: A watershed model of individual differences in fluid intelligence. Neuropsychologia 91, 186–198 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fry, A.F., Hale, S.: Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biol. Psychol. 54, 1–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finn, E.S., et al.: Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1664–1671 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paul, E.J., et al.: Dissociable brain biomarkers of fluid intelligence. Neuroimage 137, 201–211 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole, J.H., et al.: Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, C., Rangarajan, A., Ranka, S.: Visual explanations from deep 3D convolutional neural networks for alzheimer’s disease classification. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 1571–1580 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, J., Zheng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Ying, S.: Multimodal Neuroimaging Feature Learning With Multimodal Stacked Deep Polynomial Networks for Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 22, 173–183 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shansky, R.M., Woolley, C.S.: Considering sex as a biological variable will be valuable for neuroscience research. J. Neurosci. 36, 11817–11822 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sowell, E.R., Trauner, D.A., Gamst, A., Jernigan, T.L.: Development of cortical and subcortical brain structures in childhood and adolescence: a structural MRI study. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 44, 4–16 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giedd, J.N., Rapoport, J.L.: Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: what have we learned and where are we going? Neuron 67, 728–734 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfefferbaum, A., et al.: Altered brain developmental trajectories in adolescents after initiating drinking. Am. J. Psychiatry 175, 370–380 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagler, D.J., et al.: Image processing and analysis methods for the adolescent brain cognitive development study (2018). https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/11/04/457739

  18. Rohlfing, T., Zahr, N.M., Sullivan, E.V., Pfefferbaum, A.: The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 798–819 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burgaleta, M., et al.: Subcortical regional morphology correlates with fluid and spatial intelligence. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 1957–1968 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Saladin, K.S.: Anatomy & Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function. McGraw-Hill Science, Engineering & Mathematics, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. VanElzakker, M., Fevurly, R.D., Breindel, T., Spencer, R.L.: Environmental novelty is associated with a selective increase in Fos expression in the output elements of the hippocampal formation and the perirhinal cortex. Learn. Mem. 15, 899–908 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duarte, I.C., Ferreira, C., Marques, J., Castelo-Branco, M.: Anterior/posterior competitive deactivation/activation dichotomy in the human hippocampus as revealed by a 3D navigation task. PLoS ONE 9, e86213 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maguire, E.A., et al.: Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4398–4403 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cattell, R.B.: Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH), Boston (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raven, J.C., Court, J.H.: Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales: advanced progressive matrices (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Challenge Organizers and ABCD Study Researchers for the opportunity to participate and utilize their data. We also thank Kevin Flores, Erica Rutter, and John Nardini for many helpful discussions. Further, we acknowledge the following funding sources: James S. McDonnell Foundation, U54CA210180, U54CA193489, 3U54CA193489-04S3, and U01CA220378.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Ranjbar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ranjbar, S. et al. (2019). Sex Differences in Predicting Fluid Intelligence of Adolescent Brain from T1-Weighted MRIs. In: Pohl, K., Thompson, W., Adeli, E., Linguraru, M. (eds) Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Neurocognitive Prediction. ABCD-NP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31901-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31901-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31900-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31901-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics