Skip to main content

Change Your Mind: Cultural Memory and Reconciliation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Representation in Steven Universe
  • 674 Accesses

Abstract

In Steven Universe, the Crystal Gems, as sole survivors of a devastating war thousands of years in the past, face a unique challenge in articulating and sustaining a coherent cultural narrative. Thomas argues that the contrast between their individual recollections of events and their carefully constructed cultural memory is brought into sharp relief whenever the Gems are tasked with explaining their history to Steven. This tension is echoed in the interactions between the vernacular culture/memory introduced by Steven and the official culture/memory imposed by the Diamond Authority. In exploring how cultures are created, learned, and altered by points of resistance, Rebecca Sugar and her team offer a possible path toward cultural and mnemonic reconciliation, using the healing of the corrupted Gems as a model for addressing the crimes that post-conflict cultures attempt to repress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chidgey, Red. 2012. “Hand-Made Memories: Remediating Cultural Memory in DIY Feminist Networks.” In Feminist Media: Participatory Spaces, Networks, and Cultural Citizenship, edited by Elke Zobl and Ricarda Drüeke, 87–97. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Jim. 1991. “Theorizing Cultural Memory: Totalizing Recall?” American Literary History 3 (4): 829–840. https://www.jstor.org/stable/489892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coman, Alin, Ida Momennejad, Rae D. Drach, and Adra Geana. 2016. “Mnemonic Convergence in Social Networks: The Emergent Properties of Cognition at a Collective Level.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (29): 8171–8176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26470882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confino, Alon. 1997. “Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method.” The American Historical Review 102 (5): 1386–1403. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2171069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Wolfgang. 2017. “‘Electrified Voices’: Non-Human Agencies of Socio-Cultural Memory.” In Memory in Motion: Archives, Technology and the Social, edited by Ina Blom, Trond Lundemo, and Eivind Røssaak, 41–59. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Anna. 2004. “Individual Remembering and ‘Collective Memory’: Theoretical Presuppositions and Contemporary Debates.” Oral History 32 (2): 35–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40179797.

  • Hirsch, Marianne, and Valerie Smith. 2002. “Feminism and Cultural Memory: An Introduction.” Signs 28 (1): 1–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/340890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Seunghyun. 2017. “Lingering Cultural Memory and Hyphenated Exile.” In Performing Exile: Foreign Bodies, edited by Judith Rudakoff, 113–124. Intellect.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kansteiner, Wulf. 2002. “Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies.” History and Theory 41 (2): 179–197. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3590762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, José. 2011. “Toward a Foucaultian Epistemology of Resistance: Counter-Memory, Epistemic Friction, and Guerrilla Pluralism.” Foucault Studies 12: 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Michael, and Qi Wang. 2010. “Why We Remember and What We Remember: Culture and Autobiographical Memory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (4): 401–409. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41613447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, Michael. 2014. “Multidirectional Memory.” Témoigner. Entre histoire et mémoire 119: 176. https://doi.org/10.4000/temoigner.1494.

  • Said, Edward. 2002. “Invention, Memory, and Place.” In Landscape and Power, edited by W. J. T. Mitchell, 242–245. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Jay. 2010. “Sites of Memory.” In Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, edited by Susannah Radstone and Bill Schwarz, 312–324. Bronx, NY: Fordham University.

    Google Scholar 

Episodes Referenced

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thomas, E. (2020). Change Your Mind: Cultural Memory and Reconciliation. In: Ziegler, J., Richards, L. (eds) Representation in Steven Universe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31881-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics