Perceptions of Environmental Degradation



In this chapter, I explore how access to wilderness is related to perceptions of environmental impact. Multiple user groups access the refuge, all with the potential to cause environmental harm or bring about environmental degradation. I focus on the two groups primarily identified as causing environmental harm: undocumented border-crossers and Border Patrol. I argue that increasing illegal roads and vehicular damage are the most pressing environmental problems facing the refuge today. However, media accounts often focus on garbage left by undocumented border-crossers as being harmful to wilderness. I explore these varying perceptions of environmental degradation at Cabeza Prieta.


  1. American Motorcyclist Association. (2011, June 7). ATVs Allowed on Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge Roads in Arizona. Retrieved April 12, 2019, from
  2. Andreas, P. (2006). Politics on the Edge: Managing the U.S.-Mexico Border. Current History, 105(688), 64.Google Scholar
  3. Annerino, J. (1999). Dead in Their Tracks: Crossing America’s Desert Borderlands. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
  4. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). (2019). Arizona Border Trash. Retrieved April 11, 2019, from
  5. Brown, W. (2010). Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, R. (2016, December 12). Life as a Mexican American on the Border Patrol: “The System Is Not Broken.” The Guardian. Retrieved April 11, 2019, from
  7. Cart, J. (2006). In Border Battle, Land and Wildlife Are Casualties. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from
  8. Chavez, L. (2008). The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Colorado State University, Center for Environmental Management of Military Lands. (2018). Barry M. Goldwater Range Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan: Plan Update 2018. Retrieved April 12, 2019, from
  10. De León, J. (2015). The Land of the Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Fox News. (2008, May 7). Groups Struggle to Clean Up Mess Illegal Immigrants Leave Behind. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from
  13. Hartmann, B. (2004). Conserving Racism: The Greening of Hate at Home and Abroad. PopDev Different Takes Paper Series. Retrieved May 1, 2019, from
  14. Heisler, B. S. (2008). The Bracero Program and Mexican Migration to the United States. Journal of the West, 47(3), 65–72.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, S. (2006). Purity and Danger on the U.S.-Mexico Border, 1991–1994. South Atlantic Quarterly, 105(4), 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, B. (2006). Trashing the Border; Build a Wall, Save the Environment? Maybe. But as Lawmakers Decide How to Secure the Border, Illegal Crossers Are Decimating Our Treasured Lands. So Where Are the Environmentalists? USA Today. Tuesday July 11, 2006. Retrieved from
  17. Kenworthy, T. (2006). New Outlaws Plague Arizona Desert Refuges; Park Rangers Take on Extra Duties as Scenic Lands Become Illegal Gateways to USA. USA Today, August 23. Retrieved May 11, 2019, from
  18. Kosek, J. (2004). Purity and Pollution: Racial Degradation and Environmental Anxieties. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environmental Development, Social Movements (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Krausman, P., Harris, L., Blasch, C., & Koenen, K. K. G. (2010). Effects of Military Operations on Behavior and Hearing of Endangered Sonoran Pronghorn. Wildlife Monographs, 157(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
  20. McIntyre, D., & Weeks, J. (2002). Environmental Impacts of Illegal Immigration on the Cleveland National Forest in California. The Professional Geographer, 54(3), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nevins, J. (2002). Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the “Illegal Alien” and the Making of the U.S.-Mexico Boundary. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Nunez-Neto, B., & Garcia, M. J. (2007). Border Security: Barriers Along the U.S. International Border. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  23. Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Visualizing Everyday Racism: Critical Race Theory, Visual Microaggressions, and the Historical Image of Mexican Banditry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 223–238. Scholar
  24. Ponds, P. D., Burkardt, N., & Koontz, L. (2004). Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge: A Survey of Visitor Experiences: Report to Respondents. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Scholar
  25. Presumey, P. (1996). Historical Land Uses on a Wildlife Refuge: Cabeza Prieta, Arizona. Ecological Impacts and Implications on Wildlife Management. Unpublished thesis, University of Wolverhampton, England.Google Scholar
  26. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. (2008, May 22). America’s Most Imperiled Refuges. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from
  27. Ring, R. (2014, June 16). Border Out of Control: National Security Runs Roughshod Over the Arizona Wild. High Country News. Retrieved April 10, 2019, from
  28. Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  29. States News Service. (2018, September 19, Wednesday). Trash at the Border Highlights the Environmental Cost of Illegal Immigration. States News Service. Retrieved from
  30. Sullivan, E. (2007, October 1). Chertoff: Border Fence Will Improve the Environment, Not Hurt It. Associated Press. Retrieved May 1, 2019, from
  31. Sundberg, J. (2008). ‘Trash-Talk’ and the Production of Quotidian Geopolitical Boundaries in the USA–Mexico Borderlands. Social and Cultural Geography, 9, 871–890. ISSN: 1464-9365 (Print) 1470-1197 (Online) Journal homepage. Retrieved from Scholar
  32. Sundberg, J., & Kaserman, B. (2007). Cactus Carvings and Desert Defecations: Embodying Representations of Border Crossings in Protected Areas on the Mexico-U.S. Border. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), 727–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tazik, D. J., & Martin, C. O. (2002). Threatened and Endangered Species. Arid Land Research and Management, 16, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United States Congressman Rob Bishop. (2012). ICYMI: Nearly 5,000 lbs of Trash from Illegal Border Traffic Collected During Border Cleanup. Retrieved May 11, 2019, from
  35. United States Department of Agriculture. (1997, July). Introduction to Microbiotic Crusts. Washington, DC: National Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute. Retrieved April 11, 2019, from
  36. U.S. Department of the Interior. (2011). Vehicle Trails Associated with Illegal Border Activities on Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge. Ajo, AZ: Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife. (2011). Draft Environmental Assessment Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge Sonoran Pronghorn Supplemental Water and Forage Project.
  38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2010). Compatibility Determination Construction of a Communication Tower Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge.
  39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2013). Cooperative Cleanup in Desert Wilderness. By Tom Buckley and Sid Slone. Retrieved May 1, 2019, from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Service, Global Studies and Environmental StudiesBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations