A Disciplined Space



This chapter examines the relationships among immigration, conservation, and security efforts in Cabeza Prieta. Security and conservation programs have coevolved through connections among shared actors, physical space, and efforts to control the landscape. Each process—conservation and security—derives from a perception of threat and contributes to the belief that the threat from the south is increasing. Thus, it is important to pay attention to the ways in which racial and ethnic stereotypes affect conservation science and policy in border regions.


  1. Annerino, J. (1999). Dead in Their Tracks: Crossing America’s Desert Borderlands. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
  2. Cederlof, G., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2006). Ecological Nationalism: Nature, Livelihoods and Identities in South Asia. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chavez, L. (2008). The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coates, P., Cole, T., Dudley, M., & Pearson, C. (2011). Defending Nation, Defending Nature? Militarized Landscapes and Military Environmentalism in Britain, France and the United States. Environmental History, 16, 456–491. Scholar
  5. Conca, K., & Dabelko, G. (2002). Environmental Peacemaking. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cornelius, W. (2001). Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of U.S. Immigration Control Policy. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De León, J. (2015). The Land of the Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, T. (2009). Blockading the Border and Human Rights: The El Paso Operation That Remade Immigration Enforcement (1st ed., Inter-America Series). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M., Senellart, M., Ewald, F., & Fontana, A. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. New York, NY: Picador/Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Geiser, U. (2006). Contested Forests in Northwest Pakistan: The Bureaucracy Between the “Ecological,” the “National,” and the Realities of a Nation’s Frontier. In G. Cederlof & K. Sivaramakrishnan (Eds.), Ecological Nationalisms: Nature, Livelihoods and Identities in South Asia. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kosek, J. (2004). Purity and Pollution: Racial Degradation and Environmental Anxieties. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Kuletz, V. (1998). The Tainted Desert: Environmental and Social Ruin in the American West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Martínez, O. J. (2006). Troublesome Border. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  14. McCarthy, J. (2001). States of Nature and Environmental Enclosures in the American West. In N. Peluso & M. Watts (Eds.), Violent Environments. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mccombs, B. (2010, September 4). 55-gallon Drums for Migrants Are OK’d, but Rules Will Be Strict US Allows New Water Stations by Border. Arizona Daily Star.Google Scholar
  16. McIntyre, D., & Weeks, J. (2002). Environmental Impacts of Illegal Immigration on the Cleveland National Forest in California. The Professional Geographer, 54(3), 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neumann, R. (2005). Making Political Ecology. London: Hodder Headline Group.Google Scholar
  18. Nevins, J. (2002). Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the “Illegal Alien” and the Making of the U.S.-Mexico Boundary. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Pirages, D., & Manley DeGeest, T. (2004). Ecological Security: An Evolutionary Perspective on Globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Regan, M. (2010). The Death of Josseline: Immigration Stories from the Arizona Borderlands. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  21. St. John, R. (2011). Line in the Sand: A History of the Western U.S.-Mexico Border. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sundberg, J. (2008). ‘Trash-Talk’ and the Production of Quotidian Geopolitical Boundaries in the USA–Mexico Borderlands. Social and Cultural Geography.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2007). Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Wilderness Stewardship Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  24. United States Government Accountability Office. (2017, February). Southwest Border Security: Additional Actions Needed to Better Assess Fencing’s Contribution to Operations and Provide Guidance for Identifying Capability Gaps (GAO-17-331).
  25. Urban, J. L. (2008). Nation, Immigration and Environmental Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Urrea, L. A. (2004). The Devil’s Highway: A True Story. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Service, Global Studies and Environmental StudiesBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations