Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Economics of a Crowded Planet
  • 171 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces an economics of a crowded planet as the study of a materially large economy coevolving with nature and as the engine of economic policy. It discusses whether resources for the economy are limited, a source of great misunderstanding between natural scientists and economists. It argues that, on a crowded planet, the primary purpose of economics is not the study of individual choice, as the introductory textbooks claim, but to understand how to align the economy with nature, using such institutions at our disposal as the market and government regulation. This chapter outlines the rest of the book and defines terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Diamond (1991).

  2. 2.

    Scientists consider the ‘Anthropocene’ to begin following the end of the last ice age about ten thousand years ago (Kolbert 2014, pp. 107–110), even though it has only recently reached its full manifestation. At the time of writing, the term has yet to be officially adopted.

  3. 3.

    Robbins (1932, p. 15).

  4. 4.

    Samuelson (1970, p. 13), quoted in Galbraith (1973, p. 4).

  5. 5.

    Georgescu-Roegen (1971, pp. 318–319).

  6. 6.

    Costanza (2010).

  7. 7.

    Marglin (2008, p. 281).

  8. 8.

    Hill and Myatt (2010, p. 6).

  9. 9.

    Marglin (2008, p. 247).

  10. 10.

    Marglin (2008, p. 167).

  11. 11.

    An ontology is a statement about what exists.

  12. 12.

    Boulding (1966) and Daly (1991).

  13. 13.

    See, for example, in Smith (1997). The term in fact term can be found as far back as Meadows et al.’s Limits to Growth in 1972. The computer model Donella Meadows and others developed to simulate interactions among natural and social factors was used to find “a model output that represents a world system that is … sustainable without sudden and uncontrollable collapse…” (Meadows et al. 1972, p. 164). That same year, Goldsmith et al.’s Blueprint for Survival argued that “the principal defect of the industrial way of life, with its ethos of expansion, is that it is not sustainable” (Goldsmith et al. 1972, p. 3).

  14. 14.

    In fact, the ecological economists Robert Costanza and Bernard Patten did exactly this. “A sustainable system,” they wrote, “is one which survives or persists” (Costanza and Patten 1995, p. 193). Similarly, Costanza and Folke (1996, p. 19) defined ‘sustainability’ as being associated with longevity.

  15. 15.

    Worster (1995, p. 424).

  16. 16.

    Sachs (1995, p. 434).

  17. 17.

    Worster (1995, p. 425).

  18. 18.

    World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) and United Nations (1992).

  19. 19.

    Schmidheiny and Zorraquín (1996, p. 99).

  20. 20.

    Sachs (1995, pp. 434–436).

  21. 21.

    Worster (1995, p. 426).

  22. 22.

    Naess (1995, p. 464).

  23. 23.

    John Garn, pers. comm.

References

  • Boulding, K.E. 1966. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, ed. H. Jarrett, 3–14. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. 2010. Flourishing on Earth: Lessons from Ecological Economics. Lecture Given at Yale University, June 24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZkTlVPgqG4.

  • Costanza, R., and C. Folke. 1996. The Structure and Function of Ecological Systems. In Rights to Nature, ed. S.S. Hanna, C. Folke, and K.-G. Mäler, 13–34. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., and B. Patten. 1995. Defining and Predicting Sustainability. Ecological Economics 15: 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. 1991. Steady-State Economics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 1991. The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee. London: Hutchinson Radius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. 1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E., et al. 1972. Blueprint for Survival. New York: Signet, New American Library, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., and T. Myatt. 2010. The Economics Anti-Textbook: A Critical Thinker’s Guide to Microeconomics. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, E. 2014. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York: Picador, Henry Holt & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. 2008. The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D.H., et al. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. 1995. Deep Ecology for the Twenty-Second Century. In Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism, ed. G. Sessions, 463–468. Boston and London: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. 1932. The Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. 1995. Global Ecology and the Shadow of ‘Development’. In Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism, ed. G. Sessions, 428–444. Boston and London: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1970. Economics, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S., and F.J. Zorraquín. 1996. Financing Change: The Financial Community, Eco-Efficiency and Sustainable Development. With World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F.D.M. (ed.). 1997. Environmental Sustainability: Practical Global Implications. St. Lucie Press: Baton Rouge, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio De Janeiro, Annex I: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. 1995. The Shaky Ground of Sustainability. In Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism, ed. G. Sessions, 417–427. Boston and London: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murison Smith, F. (2019). Introduction. In: Economics of a Crowded Planet. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31798-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31798-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31797-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31798-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics