Skip to main content

Ideas About Plagiarism and Self-plagiarism with University Professors and Researchers: A Case Study with WebQDA

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Qualitative Research (WCQR 2019)

Abstract

Plagiarism is a problem that has more presence in our society, and it is increasingly. It is an attack on the rights of authors, it does not respect for research ethics. For this reason, the objective of our study, with qualitative focus, was to know what teachers and researchers of the University of Extremadura do who participated in the Workshop Introduction to Qualitative Analysis Software webQDA, think about the plagiarism and self-plagiarism of scientific documents. Four categories emerged from the analysis carried out: (a) concept of plagiarism and self-plagiarism, (b) motives for plagiarism, (c) use of self-plagiarism software and (e) frequency of plagiarism. The most significant results suggest that sometimes self-plagiarism is not considered plagiarism and from the perspective of the investigation the intentions of those who commit plagiarism determine its definition and impact. In addition, participants do not express concern about evaluating the originality of a text using specialized computer media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Girón, S.J.: Anotaciones sobre el Plagio. Universidad Sergio Arboleda, Colombia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Imran, N.: Electronic media, creativity and plagiarism. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 40(4), 28–32 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miranda, A.: Plagio y ética de la investigación científica. Rev. Chil. de Derecho 40(2), 711–726 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soto, A.: El plagio y su impacto a nivel académico y profesional. E-Cien. de la Información 2(1), 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balbuena, P.: El plagio como ilícito legal. Revista Ventana Legal. En Red. (http://www.ventanalegal.com/revista_ventanalegal/plagio_ilicito.htm)

  6. Ramírez, R., Jiménez, H.D.: Plagio y “auto-plagio”. Una reflexión. HistoReLo, Rev. de historia Reg. y Local 8(16), 271–284 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rojas, M.E.: Plagio en textos académicos. Rev. electrónica Educare 16(2), 55–66 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carvalho, J., Luengo, R., Casas, L., Cubero, J.: What is better to study: the printed book or the digital book?: An exploratory study of qualitative nature.: En: Costa, A., Reis, I., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported qualitative Research. New trends on Qualitative Research, pp. 34–45. Springer, Switzerland (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bardin, L.: El análisis de contenido. Akal, Madrid (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N.: How to Design Evaluate Research in Education. McGrawHill, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Solís, E., Porlán, R., Rivero, A.: ¿Cómo presentar el conocimiento curricular de los profesores en ciencias y su evolución? Enseñanza de las Cienc. 30(3), 9–30 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neri de Souza, F., Costa, A. P., Moreira, A.: WebQDA: Software de apoio à análise qualitativa. En: Rocha, A. (ed.) 5a Conferência Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, CISTI 2010. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, pp. 293–298 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tudela, J., Aznar, J.: ¿Publicar o morir? El fraude en la investigación y las publicaciones científicas. Persona y Bioética 17(1), 12–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Post, D., Stambach, A., Ginsburg, M., Hannum, E., Beanavot, A., Bjork, C.: Rank scholarship. Comp. Educ. Rev. 56(1), 1–17 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sureda, J., Comas, R., Morey, M.: Las causas del plagio académico entre el alumnado universitario según el profesorado. RIE 50(1), 197–220 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Melo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Melo, L., Soto-Ardila, L.M., Luengo, R., Carvalho, J.L. (2020). Ideas About Plagiarism and Self-plagiarism with University Professors and Researchers: A Case Study with WebQDA. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. WCQR 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1068. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics