Skip to main content

Is the Debate on Poverty Research a Global One? A Consideration of the Exclusion of Odera Oruka’s ‘Human Minimum’ as a Case of Epistemic Injustice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Poverty ((PPOV,volume 2))

Abstract

In this work, I argue that the poverty debate, particularly the one based on qualitative research, has yet to go global due to the exclusion of ideas from scholars in the Global South. For example, despite the great insight of the Kenyan philosopher Odera Oruka on poverty leading to his theory of “the human minimum”, and despite the fact that his works are available in libraries around the world, there is a noticeable exclusion of his views in the contemporary debate on global poverty. In this chapter, I will discuss the state of global poverty research. I will present Oruka’s views on poverty and show not only their implications for sub-Saharan Africa, but also for the world as a whole. I will argue that the exclusion of voices from the Global South amounts to what Miranda Fricker calls epistemic injustice. In the last section, I will conclude by proposing conversational thinking—a form of inclusive, fair, intercultural epistemic engagement for globalizable poverty research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the contributions to Journal of International Political Theory 2016, 12:2.

  2. 2.

    A good number of African philosophers have also accused their Western counterparts of intentionally legislating for all of humanity by universalizing their cultural particulars and suppressing epistemologies from the South (see Hebga 1958, Serequeberhan 1991, Janz 2009, Hallen 2010, and recently, Masaka 2017).

  3. 3.

    See https://www.sunnewsonline.com/south-african-judge-dies-of-black-mamba-snake-bite-in-zambia/. Accessed 30 June 2019.

References

  • Alcoff, Linda M., and Eva F. Kittay. 2007. The Blackwell guide to feminist philosophy. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, Sabina, and James Foster. 2007. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement, OPHI Working Paper 7. University of Oxford. http://www.ophi.org.uk/pubs/OPHI_WP7.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.

  • Alkire, Sabina, and Maria E. Santos. 2010. Multidimensional poverty index. The Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). http://www.ophi.org.uk. Accessed 27 Mar 2018.

  • Anderson, E., and H. Waddington. 2007. Aid and the millennium development goal poverty target: How much is required and how should it be allocated? Oxford Development Studies 35: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810601167561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asouzu, Innocent. 2007. Ibuanyidanda: New complementary ontology, beyond world-immanentism, ethnocentric reduction and impositions. London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B., and J. Hoddinott. 2000. Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies 36: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380008422652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political theory and international relations. Rev. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattman, Christopher, and Jeannie Annan. 2016. Can employment reduce lawlessness and rebellion? A field experiment with high-risk men in a fragile state. American Political Science Review 110: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattman, Christopher, Julian C. Jamison, and Margaret Sheridan. 2012. Experimentally testing the roots of poverty and violence: Changing preferences, behaviors, and outcomes. http://chrisblattman.com/documents/research/2012.01.13_STYL_NSF_proposal.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2018.

  • Blattman, C., J.C. Jamison, and M. Sheridan. 2017. Reducing crime and violence: Experimental evidence from cognitive behavioral therapy in Liberia: Dataset. American Economic Review 17: 1165–1206. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, J.A. 2010. Have the poor gotten poorer?: The American experience from 1987 to 2007. Journal of Poverty 14: 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875541003711813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimakonam, J.O. 2017a. African philosophy and global epistemic injustice. Journal of Global Ethics 13: 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2017.1364660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimakonam, Jonathan O. 2017b. An interrogation of capital punishment in Nigeria’s penal system: Towards a freedom theory of punishment in African philosophy. In The death penalty from an African perspective: Views from Zimbabwean and Nigerian philosophers, ed. Fainos Mangena and Jonathan O. Chimakonam, 115–136. Delaware: Vernon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Ezumezu: A system of logic for African philosophy and studies. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chimakonam, J.O., and V.C.A. Nweke. 2018. Why the ‘politics’ against African philosophy should be discontinued. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 57 (2): 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimakonam, Jonathan O., Sunny N. Agu, and Joseph N. Agbo. 2014. The nemesis of individualistic ontology in globalization and the practice of liberal democracy in post-colonial Africa. The Journal of Pan African Studies 7: 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniewicz, Laura. 2015. It’s time to redraw the world’s very unequal knowledge map. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/its-time-to-redraw-the-worlds-very-unequal-knowledge-map-44206. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.

  • Edward, P. 2006. The ethical poverty line: A moral quantification of absolute poverty. Third World Quarterly 27: 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500432739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbai, Uti Ojah, and Jonathan O. Chimakonam. 2019. Why conversational thinking could be an alternative method for intercultural philosophy. Journal of Intercultural Studies 40 (2): 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2019.1577811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, Rainer. 2012. A right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. Trans. J. Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1999. Michel Foucault and Zen: A stay in Zen Temple. In Religion and culture, ed. Jeremy Carrette, 110–114. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Frank J. 2001. Review of “the law of peoples”. Houston Journal of International Law 23: 659–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graness, A. 2015. Is the debate on ‘global justice’ a global one? Some considerations in view of modern philosophy in Africa. Journal of Global Ethics 11: 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1010014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, J., U. Gentilini, and A. Sumner. 2014. National or international poverty lines or both? Setting goals for income poverty after 2015. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development 15: 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2014.899565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyekye, Kwame. 1997. Tradition and modernity: Philosophical reflections on the African experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, Barry. 2010. Ethnophilosophy redefined? Thought and practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya. New Series 2: 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebga, M. 1958. Logic in Africa. Philosophy Today 2: 221–229. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday19582435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickel, J. 2016. The true extent of global poverty and hunger: Questioning the good news narrative of the Millennium Development Goals. Third World Quarterly 37: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1109439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikuenobe, Polycarp. 2006. Philosophical perspectives on communalism and morality in African traditions. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iroegbu, Pantaleon. 1995. Metaphysics: The Kpim of philosophy. Owerri: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz, Bruce. 2009. Philosophy in an African place. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, Faith. 2017. 20 million at risk of starvation in world’s largest crisis since 1945. CNN World. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/11/africa/un-famine-starvation-aid/. Accessed 13 June 2017.

  • Kharas, H., K. Hamel, and M. Hofer. 2018. The start of a new poverty narrative. Brookings Institution. June, 19, 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/06/19/the-start-of-a-new-poverty-narrative/

  • Kimmerle, H. 1994. Die dimensionen des interkulturellen. Philosophie in Afrika—Afrikanische philosophie. Amsterdam: Supplemente und Verallgemeinerungsschritte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, R.S., M. Lombe, and K. Miller. 2012. Global poverty and hunger: An assessment of millennium development goal #1. Journal of Poverty 16: 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2012.720661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukathas, Chandran. 2006. The mirage of global justice. Social Philosophy and Policy 23: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwadzo, M. 2015. Choosing concepts and measurements of poverty: A comparison of three major poverty approaches. Journal of Poverty 19: 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2015.1015067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laderchi, Caterine R., Ruth Saith, and Frances Stewart. 2003. Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty: A comparison of four approaches. Oxford Development Studies 31: 233–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Anthony J. 2010. Is global justice a mirage? European Journal of International Relations 17: 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangena, Fainos. 2016. Hunhu/Ubuntu in the traditional thought of Southern Africa. In Internet encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. James Fieser and Brad Dowden. http://www.iep.utm.edu/hunhu/. Accessed 3 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaka, D. 2017. ‘Global justice’ and the suppressed epistemologies of the indigenous people of Africa. Philosophical Papers 46: 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2017.1295624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matolino, Bernard. 2014. Personhood in African philosophy. Pietermaritzburg: Cluster Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkiti, Ifeanyi A. 1984. Person and community in African traditional thought. In African philosophy: An introduction, ed. Richard A. Wright, 3rd ed., 41–55. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Thaddeus. 2011. Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal 11: 532–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. 2013. The Western ethic of care or an afro-communitarian ethic? Specifying the right relational morality. Journal of Global Ethics 9: 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2012.756421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Thaddeus. 2015. An African egalitarianism: Bringing community to bear on equality. In The equal society: Essays on equality in theory and practice, ed. George Hall, 185–208. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Replacing development: An afro-communal approach to global justice. Philosophical Papers 46: 111–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. 2015. Political liberalism and global justice. Journal of Global Ethics 11: 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1015081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyasulu, Gerald. 2010. Revisiting the definition of poverty. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa 12: 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nzegwu, Nkiru. 1996. Philosophers’ intellectual responsibility to African females. American Philosophical Association’s (APA Newsletter) 90: 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oduyoye, Mercy A. 1995. Daughters of Anowa: African women and patriarchy. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogundipe-Leslie, Molara. 1994. Re-creating ourselves: African women and critical transformations. Trenton: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogwu, U.Joy. 1996. Perspectives of the critical impediments to women in the decision-making process. In Nigerian women in politics, ed. Clara Osinulu and Nina Mba, 35–42. Lagos: Malthouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oheneba-Sakyi, Yaw, and Kofi Awusabo-Asare. 1999. Female autonomy, family decision making, and demographic behavior in Africa. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oruka, H. Odera. 1981. John Rawls’ ideology: Justice as egalitarian fairness. Reprinted in Practical philosophy: In search of an ethical minimum, ed. H. Odera Oruka, 1997, 115–125. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985 [1976]. Punishment and terrorism in Africa: Problems in the philosophy and practice of punishment, 2nd ed. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bereau.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. The philosophy of foreign aid: A question of the right to a human minimum. Reprinted in Practical philosophy: In search of an ethical minimum, ed. H. Odera Oruka, 1997, 81–93. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oruka, H.Odera. 1997. Practical philosophy. Nairobi: East African Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Nirav. 2018. Figure of the week: Understanding poverty in Africa. Brookings Institution. November 21, 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/africa-in-focus/2018/11/21/figure-of-the-week-understanding-poverty-in-africa/

  • Pogge, Thomas W. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praeg, Leonhard. 2014. A report on Ubuntu. Pietermaritzburg: UKZN Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramose, Mogobe B. 2005. African philosophy through Ubuntu. Harare: Mond Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Rev. ed. [1999]. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, N. 2011. Millennium development goal 1: Poverty, hunger and decent work in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly 32: 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.543814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, M. 2016. What difference can it make: Why write books on global justice in the first place? Journal of International Political Theory 12: 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088215626738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura d.S. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Serequeberhan, Tsenay. 1991. African philosophy: The point in question. In African philosophy: The essential reading, ed. Tsenay Serequeberhan, 3–28. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Susan M., and Janet Lee. 2012. Women’s voices, feminist visions: Classic and contemporary readings. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleat, Matt. 2016. The value of global justice: Realism and moralism. Journal of International Political Theory 12: 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, Lynne. 1983. Intruders on the rights of men: Women’s unpublished heritage. London: Pandora Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tshabalala, Sibusiso. 2015. More than half of Africa’s top Research Universities are in South Africa. Quartz Africa. https://qz.com/449143/more-than-half-of-africas-top-research-universities-are-in-south-africa/. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.

  • U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2009. Rethinking poverty: Report on the world social situation 2010. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/docs/2010/fullreport.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2017.

  • Wolff, Jonathan, Edward Lamb, and Eliana Zur-Szpiro. 2015. A philosophical review of poverty. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan O. Chimakonam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chimakonam, J.O. (2020). Is the Debate on Poverty Research a Global One? A Consideration of the Exclusion of Odera Oruka’s ‘Human Minimum’ as a Case of Epistemic Injustice. In: Beck, V., Hahn, H., Lepenies, R. (eds) Dimensions of Poverty. Philosophy and Poverty, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics