Skip to main content

Poverty as a Social Relation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dimensions of Poverty

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Poverty ((PPOV,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter argues that there are theoretical benefits to understanding poverty as a kind of social relation: that is, a social position defined by the character of the interpersonal relationships a person is susceptible to losing or falling into in virtue of occupying that position. I begin with a methodological question: how, if at all, can philosophers as such make a valuable contribution to theoretical work on poverty? After sketching an answer to this question, I outline and motivate the general proposal that poverty can be understood as a social relation. In doing so, I draw an analogy to Sally Haslanger’s analysis of gender as a social position. Then I illustrate this proposal with two examples of the kinds of interpersonal relationships that figure in the content of poverty as a social relation: one positive (social networks) and one negative (invidious stereotyping). Finally, I conclude by considering an objection and sketching a few practical proposals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a canonical discussion of declining social capital in the American context, see Putnam (2000).

  2. 2.

    For an overview, see The National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (2014).

  3. 3.

    For a popular overview of this phenomenon in the American context, see Rampell (2012).

  4. 4.

    Among others, Larry Blum (2004) emphasizes these features of stereotypes.

  5. 5.

    For a first-person discussion of this phenomenon, see Ehrenreich (2001).

  6. 6.

    Even if it is too strong to say that respect for persons “consists in” giving appropriate weight to their interests (Raz 1986, p. 188), I take it that just about any plausible theory of respect holds that such a response is at least a necessary condition of respect for persons.

  7. 7.

    For a discussion of this objection, see Scheffler (2015).

  8. 8.

    A point vividly brought home in Desmond (2016).

  9. 9.

    For an overview, see McKenna (2015).

References

  • Barry, Brian. 2005. Why social justice matters. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Larry. 2004. Stereotypes and stereotyping: A moral analysis. Philosophical Papers 33: 251–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordelli, Chiara. 2015. Justice as fairness and relational resources. The Journal of Political Philosophy 23: 86–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, Matthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American City. New York: Crown Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2001. Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, and Nancy Fraser. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, Laura. 2015. The cost of an adjunct. The Atlantic Monthly, May 26. https://www.theatlantic.com/edcation/archive/2015/05/the-cost-of-an-adjunct/394091/. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, Margaret. 1986. Residential rent control. Philosophy & Public Affairs 15: 350–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampell, Catherine. 2012. Marriage is for rich people. The New York Times, February 6. https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/marriage-is-for-rich-people/. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.

  • Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Samuel. 2015. The practice of equality. In Social equality: Essays on what it means to be equals, ed. Carina Fourie, Fabien Shuppert, and Ivo Wallimann-Helmer, 21–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1983. Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers 35: 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976 [1776]. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty. 2014. No safe place: The criminalization of homelessness in U.S. cities. https://www.nlchp.org/documents/No_Safe_Place. Accessed 5 Nov 2018.

  • Warren, Mark, J. Phillip Thompson, and Susan Saegert. 2001. Social capital and poor communities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Jonathan, Edward Lamb, and Eliana Zur-Szpiro. 2015. A philosophical review of poverty. New York: Joseph Roundtree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Putnam, D. (2020). Poverty as a Social Relation. In: Beck, V., Hahn, H., Lepenies, R. (eds) Dimensions of Poverty. Philosophy and Poverty, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics