Abstract
Handwriting is a human activity that may be affected by the modality used as input of the information to be written, mainly copying or dictation. Many processes at different levels are involved to produce motor planning and graphomotor automation of handwriting. In order to quantify possible kinematic differences due to the influence of auditory or visual input modalities to these processes, three different tests were proposed to a sample of 101 young students and several kinematics parameters measuring handwriting characteristics were evaluated. The tests required to copy as accurate (CA) and as fast (CF) as possible an Italian sentence and to write the same sentence under dictation (DF). All parameters showed significant differences between each pair of the three tests. The best performance was obtained in the CF test followed by the DF and CA tests; in the latter the greater accuracy required to produce writing yielded lower velocity and automation as well as a longer motor planning time. On the other hand, the dictation response was more similar to that of CF than CA showing a larger planning time, probably due to a different time necessary to correctly identify the words to reproduce. The combination of the two tests could be useful to study the impairment of either visual or auditory input.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ellis, A.W., Young, A.W.: Human Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Textbook. Taylor & Francis Ltd, Milton Park (1996)
Rosemblum, S., Chevion, D., Weiss, P.L.: Using data visualization and signal processing to characterize the handwriting process. Pediatr. Rehabil. 9, 404–417 (2006)
Mavrogiorgou, P., Mergl, R., Tigges, P., El Husseini, J., Schroter, A., Juckel, G., Zaudig, M., Hengerl, U.: Kinematical analysis of handwriting movements in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 70, 605–612 (2001)
Mergl, R., Tigges, P., Schroter, A., Moller, H.J., Hergel, U.: Digitized analysis of handwriting and handwriting movements in healthy subjects: methods, results and perspectives. J. Neurosci. Methods 90, 157–169 (1999)
Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., Roux, S.: Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: different tasks, different pathways? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68(7), 1268–1294 (2015)
Cheng-Lai, A., Li-Tsang, C.W.P., Chan, A.H.L., Lo, A.G.W.: Writing to dictation and handwriting performance among Chinese children with dyslexia: relationships with orthographic knowledge and perceptual-motor skills. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34, 3372–3383 (2013)
Tan, Y., Liu, X.: Influence of grapheme and syllable learning on handwriting output of Chinese characters in children with dictation difficulties. Front. Psychol. 9, 1671 (2018)
Tucha, O., Lange, K.W.: The effect of conscious control on handwriting in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Attent. Disord. 1, 323–332 (2005)
Charvin, H., Proteau, L.: Development differences in the processing of afferent information for motor control. Dev. Neuropsychol. 12, 387–407 (1996)
Di Brina, C., Niels, R., Overvelde, A., Levi, G., Hulstijn, W.: Dynamic time warping: a new method in the study of poor handwriting. Hum. Mov. Sci. 27, 242–255 (2008)
Rosemblum, S., Livnech-Zirinski, M.: Handwriting process and product characteristics of children diagnosed with development coordinator disorder. Hum. Mov. Sci. 27, 200–214 (2008)
Accardo, P., Genna, M., Borean, M.: Development, maturation and learning influence on hand-writing kinematics. Hum. Mov. Sci. 32(5), 999–1009 (2013)
Suarez-Coalla, P., Gonzalez-Martin, N., Cuetos, F.: Word writing in Spanish-speaking children: central and peripheral processes. Acta Physiol. 19, 201–209 (2018)
Van Galen, G.P., Stelmach, G.E. (eds.): Handwriting-issue of psychomotor control and cognitive models. Acta Psychol. 82, 1–3 (1993)
Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chng, C., Liu, H., Peng, H.: Chinese children’s character recognition: visuo-orthograpic, phonological processing and morphological skills. J. Res. Read. 35, 287–307 (2010)
Rapp, B.C., Caramazza, A.: The modality-specific organization of grammatical categories: evidence from impaired spoken and written sentence production. Brain Lang. 286, 248–286 (1997)
Bisani, M., Ney, H.: Joint-sequence models for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. Speech Commun. 50(5), 434 (2008)
Acknowledgement
Work partially supported by the Master in Clinical Engineering, University of Trieste.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giulia, S., Agostino, A. (2020). Handwriting Kinematic Differences Between Copying and Dictation. In: Henriques, J., Neves, N., de Carvalho, P. (eds) XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31634-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31635-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)